Abstract
Background
Reduction in lip volume is a stigmata of the aging face. There are many lip augmentation techniques but very few studies analyzing how these techniques change the three-dimensional structure of the lips. Furthermore, there is no consensus about whether the lip position should be standardized to either the lips closed or parted. The aim of this study was first to obtain a three-dimensional quantitative analysis of the lips in adults and to look for sexual dimorphism and, second, to compare whether more consistent measurements of the oral region can be obtained with the mouth open compared with it closed.
Methods
Seventy young Caucasian volunteers underwent lip dimension analysis using 3D stereophotogrammetry with lips parted and closed. Parameters measured for consistency of results were linear distances (e.g., mouth width, total lip height, upper lip height), surface distances (e.g., upper vermilion), areas (e.g., vermilion upper and lower lip, total vermilion), and volumes (upper and lower lip volume, total lip volume). Analysis also compared lip dimensions between male and female subjects.
Results
Consistent and reproducible results were seen with the lips closed compared with lips apart. All lip parameters (distances, areas, and volumes) were larger in men than in women. The following measurements had significant differences between males and females: mouth width, upper lip height median, upper white lip height median, upper white lip height lateral, lower vermilion surface distance, and area of vermilion (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
We present a novel technique for aesthetic assessment of the lips that is objective and achieves consistency with the lips in the closed position. Males have greater lip dimensions compared with females.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Farkas LG, Kolar JC (1987) Anthropometrics and art in the aesthetics of women’s faces. Clin Plast Surg 14(4):599–616
Gonzalez-Ulloa M (1975) Transactions of the sixth international congress of plastic and reconstructive surgery: the aging upper lip. Masson, Paris
Aiache AE (1991) Augmentation cheiloplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 88(2):222–226
Austin HW (1986) The lip lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 77(6):990–994
Lassus C (1981) Thickening the thin lips. Plast Reconstr Surg 68(6):950–952
de Benito J, Fernandez-Sanza I (1996) Galea and subgalea graft for lip augmentation revision. Aesthetic Plast Surg 20(3):243–248
Chajchir A, Benzaquen I (1989) Fat-grafting injection for soft-tissue augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 84(6):921–934; discussion 935
Fanous N (1984) Correction of thin lips: “lip lift.” Plast Reconstr Surg 74(1):33–41
Hinderer UT (1995) Aging of the upper lip: a new treatment technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 19(6):519–526
Linder RM (1992) Permanent lip augmentation employing polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 90(6):1083–1090; discussion 1091–1092
Samiian MR (1993) Lip augmentation for correction of thin lips. Plast Reconstr Surg 91(1):162–166
Tobin HA, Karas ND (1998) Lip augmentation using an alloderm graft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56(6):722–777
Chiandussi S, Tappuni AR, Watson TF, White A, Escudier MP, Sanderson JD, Challacombe SJ (2007) Lip impressions: a new method for monitoring morphological changes in orofacial granulomatosis. Oral Dis 13(1):93–98
Sclafani AP, Romo T 3rd, Jacono AA (2002) Rejuvenation of the aging lip with an injectable acellular dermal graft (Cymetra). Arch Facial Plast Surg 4(4):252–257
Jacono AA, Quatela VC (2004) Quantitative analysis of lip appearance after V-Y lip augmentation. Arch Facial Plast Surg 6(3):172–177
Lundstrom A, Forsberg CM, Peck S, McWilliam J (1992) A proportional analysis of the soft tissue facial profile in young adults with normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 62(2):127–133; discussion 133–134
Skinazi GL, Lindauer SJ, Isaacson RJ (1994) Chin, nose, and lips. Normal ratios in young men and women. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 106(5):518–523
Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, Miani A Jr (1995) A computerized non-invasive method for the assessment of human facial volume. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 23(5):280–286
See MS, Miedzianowski-Sinclair NA, Roberts N, Nduka C (2007) Stereophotogrammetric measurement of the nasolabial fold in repose: a study of age and posture-related changes. Eur J Plast Surg 29:387–393
Farkas L (1994) Examination. In: Farkas LG (eds), Anthropometrey of the head and face, 2nd edn. Raven Press, New York, pp 23–44
Ardehali B, Nouraei SA, Van Dam H, Dex E, Wood S, Nduka C (2007) Objective assessment of keloid scars with three-dimensional imaging: quantifying response to intralesional steroid therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 119(2):556–561
Peck S, Peck L (1995) Selected aspects of the art and science of facial esthetics. Semin Orthod 1(2):105–126
Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Schmitz JH, Ciusa V, Colombo A (2000) Normal growth and development of the lips: a 3-dimensional study from 6 years to adulthood using a geometric model. J Anat 196(Pt 3):415–423
Scheiderman G, Bell WH, Legan HL et al (1980) Cephalometric analysis of dentofacial normals. Am J Orthod 78(4):404–420
Burstone C (1967) Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod 53:226–235
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sawyer, A.R., See, M. & Nduka, C. 3D Stereophotogrammetry Quantitative Lip Analysis. Aesth Plast Surg 33, 497–504 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9191-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-008-9191-1