Skip to main content
Log in

Information and effective number of meioses in linkage analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

In this paper we introduce two information criteria in linkage analysis. The setup is a sample of families with unusually high occurrence of a certain inheritable disease. Given phenotypes from all families, the two criteria measure the amount of information inherent in the sample for 1) testing existence of a disease locus harbouring a disease gene somewhere along a chromosome or 2) estimating the position of the disease locus.

Both criteria have natural interpretations in terms of effective number of meioses present in the sample. Thereby they generalize classical performance measures directly counting number of informative meioses.

Our approach is conditional on observed phenotypes and we assume perfect marker data. We analyze two extreme cases of complete and weak penetrance models in particular detail. Some consequences of our work for sampling of pedigrees are discussed. For instance, a large sibship family with extreme phenotypes is very informative for linkage for weak penetrance models, more informative than a number of small families of the same total size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ängquist, L., Hössjer, O.: Improving the calculation of statistical significance in genome-wide scans. Report 2003:3, Mathematical Statistics, Stockholm University, To appear in Biostatistics (2003)

  2. Commenges, D.: Robust genetic linkage analysis based on a score test of homogeneity: The weighted pairwise correlation statistic. Genet. Epidmiol. 11, 189–200 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Donnelly, P.: The probability that some related individuals share some section of the genome identical by descent. Theoret. Population Biol. 23, 34–64 (1983)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dudoit, S., Speed, T.P.: A score test for linkage analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits based on identity by descent data from sib-pairs. Biostatist. 1, 1–26 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feingold, E., O’Brown, P., Siegmund, D.: Gaussian models for genetic linkage analysis using complete high-resolution maps of identity by descent. Am. J. of Hum. Genet. 53, 234–251 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher, R.: The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh. 52, 399–433 (1918)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haines, J.L., Paricak-Vance, M.A.: Approaches to Gene Mapping in Complex Human Diseases. New York: Wiley-Liss, (1998)

  8. Hössjer, O.: Determining inheritance distributions via stochastic penetrances. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 98, 1035–1051 (2003e)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hössjer, O.: Asymptotic estimation theory of multipoint linkage analysis under perfect marker information. Ann. Statist. 31, 1075–1109 (2003a)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hössjer, O.: Assessing accuracy in linkage analysis by means of confidence regions. Genet. Epidemiol. 25, 59–72 (2003b)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hössjer, O.: Conditional likelihood score functions in linkage analysis, 2003c. Report 2003:10, Mathematical Statistics, Stockholm University. To appear in Biostatistics

  12. Hössjer, O.: Spectral decomposition of score functions in linkage analysis, 2003d. Report 2003:21, Mathematical Statistics, Stockholm University.

  13. Kempthorne, O.: Genetic Statistics. New York: Wiley, (1955)

  14. Kruglyak, L., Lander, E.S.: High-resolution gene mapping of complex traits. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 56, 1212–1223 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kruglyak, L., Daly, M.J., Reeve-Daly, M.P., Lander, E.S.: Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: A unified multipoint approach. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 58, 1347–1363 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kurbasic, A., Hössjer, O.: Computing p-values in parametric linkage analysis, 2003. Report 2003:18, Mathematical Statistics, Stockholm University. To appear in Human Heredity

  17. Lynch, M., Walsh, B.: Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates Inc., (1998)

  18. McPeek, M.S.: Optimal allele-sharing statistics for genetic mapping using affected relatives. Genet. Epid. 16, 225–249 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ott, J.: Analysis of Human Genetic Linkage, third edn., John Hopkins Univ. Press, (1999)

  20. Risch, N.: Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits I. Multilocus models. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 46, 222–228 (1990a)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Risch, N.: Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits II. The power of affected relative pairs. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 46, 229–241 (1990b)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Risch, N., Zhang, H.: Extreme discordant sib pairs for mapping quantitative trait loci in humans. Science 268, 1584–1589 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Siegmund, D.: Boundary crossing probabilities and statistical applications. Ann. Statist. 14, 361–404 (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Sham, P.: Statistics in Human Genetics. Arnold Applications of Statistics, London, (1998)

  25. Tang, H-K., Siegmund, D.: Mapping quantitative trait loci in oligogenic models. Biostatistics 2, 147–162 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Winter, R.M.: The estimation of phenotype distributions from pedigree data. Am. J. Med. Genet. 7, 537–542 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ola Hössjer.

Additional information

Research sponsored by the Swedish Research Council, under contract nr. 626-2002-6286.

Acknowledgement The author wishes to thank two referees for helpful comments on an earlier version of the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hössjer, O. Information and effective number of meioses in linkage analysis. J. Math. Biol. 50, 208–232 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-004-0289-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-004-0289-z

Keywords or phrases

Navigation