Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

MR imaging of the contralateral breast in patients after breast-conserving therapy

  • Breast
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study was undertaken to assess the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR mammography (MRM) of the contralateral breast in patients treated by breast-conserving therapy previously. A total of 119 patients underwent 145 standardized dynamic MR studies (1 T, T1-weighted 3D FLASH, 0.2 mmol Gd-DTPA/kg body weight). We retrospectively evaluated the results of conventional methods and MRM. A total of 11 contralateral carcinomas were present (detection rate 9%). The interval between treatment of the first primary and identification of contralateral malignancy was 9–80 months (mean 33 months). The MRM allowed detection of four otherwise occult malignancies. One of 11 cancer was missed on MRM due to benign appearance of enhancement. Compared with conventional methods MRM improved sensitivity (91 vs 64%) and specificity (90 vs 84%), respectively. This study suggests that additional MRM of the contralateral breast increases the diagnostic accuracy not only by enhancing the detection of second cancers but also by reducing false-positive results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1a–f
Fig. 2a–g

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen Y, Thompson W, Semenciw R et al. (1999) Epidemiology of contralateral breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:855–861

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Roubidoux MA, Helvie MA, Lai N et al. (1995) Bilateral breast cancer: early detection with mammography. Radiology 196:427–431

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. American Society of Clinical Oncology (1997) Recommended breast cancer surveillance guidelines. J Clin Oncol 15:2149–2156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL et al. (1993) MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 197:493–501

    Google Scholar 

  5. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM et al. (1995) Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 196:115–122

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Viehweg P, Heinig A et al. (1997) Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Eur J Radiol 24:94–108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rieber A, Brahms HJ, Gabelmann A et al. (2002) Breast MRI for monitoring response of primary breast cancer to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Radiol 12:1711–1719

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fischer U, Vosshenrich R, Probst A et al. (1994) Preoperative MR mammography in patients with breast cancer: useful information or useless extravagance? Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr. 161.4:300–306

  9. Rieber A, Merkle E, Böhm W et al. (1997) MRI of histologically confirmed mammary carcinoma: clinical relevance of diagnostic procedures for detection of multifocal or contralateral secondary carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21:773–779

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liberman L, Morris EA, Kim CM et al. (2003) MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. AJR 180:333–341

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee SG, Orel SG, Woo IJ et al. (2003) MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results. Radiology 226:773–778

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Slanetz PJ, Edmister WB, Yeh ED et al. (2002) Occult contralateral breast carcinoma incidentally detected by breast magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J 8:145–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Viehweg P, Heinig A, Amaya B et al. (2002) MR-guided interventional breast procedures considering vacuum biopsy in particular. Eur J Radiol 42:32–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Boetes C, Strijk SP, Holland R et al. (1997) False-negative MR imaging of malignant breast tumors. Eur Radiol 7:1231–1234

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG et al. (1997) Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 202:833–841

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wedegärtner U, Bick U, Wörtler K et al. (2001) Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography: usefulness of morphological criteria. Eur Radiol 11:1645–1650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Viehweg P, Lampe D, Buchmann J et al. (2000) In situ and minimally invasive breast cancer: morphologic and kinetic features on contrast-enhanced MR imaging. MAGMA 11:129–137

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Perlet C, Heinig A, Prat X et al. (2002) Multicenter study for the evaluation of a dedicated biopsy device for MR-guided vacuum biopsy of the breast. Eur Radiol 12:1463–1470

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petra Viehweg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Viehweg, P., Rotter, K., Laniado, M. et al. MR imaging of the contralateral breast in patients after breast-conserving therapy. Eur Radiol 14, 402–408 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2086-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2086-2

Keywords

Navigation