Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in elderly men and is one of the most important causes of death from cancer in men. The diagnosis of PCa is based on a combination of digital rectal examination, PSA and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). However, this combination does not reach the accuracy of detection and localization necessary for proper decisions on treatment methods. Therefore, biopsies are performed in all cases for which the suspicion of PCa is raised. Even with biopsies, staging and grading of PCa is far from optimal. More accurate imaging is necessary to improve the biopsy sampling, the goals being to replace systematic biopsies by a targeted approach and to improve staging and grading of PCa. Ultrasound imaging of the prostate remains the first choice of imaging to visualize the prostate, however, gray-scale ultrasound imaging has an accuracy of about 50–60% for the detection of PCa and TRUS used for local staging has an even lower accuracy. The development of PCa is associated with changes in the metabolism of tumor cells, and therefore with changes in the blood perfusion of the involved tissue. This paper focuses on contrast specific imaging techniques to visualize these changes in blood perfusion. Techniques such as color and power Doppler imaging, and contrast enhanced imaging techniques using color and power Doppler, harmonic imaging and intermittent imaging are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aarnink RG, Beerlage HP, de la Rosette JJ, Debruyne FM, Wijkstra H (1999) Contrast angiosonography: a technology to improve Doppler ultrasound examinations of the prostate. Eur Urol 35:9–20
American Cancer Society (2004) Cancer facts and figures. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
Basude R, Wheatley MA (2001) Generation of ultraharmonics in surfactant based ultrasound contrast agents: use and advantages. Ultrasonics 39:437–444
Bogers HA, Sedelaar JPM, Beerlage HP et al. (1999) Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional power Doppler angiography of the human prostate: correlation with biopsy outcome. Urology 54:97–104
Borre M, Offersen BV, Nerstrom B, Overgaard J (1998) Microvessel density predicts survival in prostate cancer patients subjected to watchful waiting. Br J Cancer 78:940–944
Bouakaz A, Frigstad S, Ten Cate FJ, De Jong N (2002) Super harmonic imaging: a new imaging technique for improved contrast detection. Ultrasound Med Biol 28:59–68
Bree RL (1997) The role of color Doppler and staging biopsies in prostate cancer detection. Urology 49:31–34
Bustamante E, Morris HP, Pedersen PL (1981) Energy metabolism of tumor cells. Requirement for a form of hexokinase with a propensity for mitochondrial binding. J Biol Chem 256:8699–8704
Chang JJ, Shinohara K, Bhargava V, Presti JCJr (1998) Prospective evaluation of lateral biopsies of the peripheral zone for prostate cancer detection. J Urol 160:2111–2114
Chomas JE, Dayton P, Allen J, Morgan K, Ferrara KW (2001). Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 48:232–248
Cornud F, Belin X, Piron D et al. (1997) Color Doppler-guided prostate biopsies in 591 patients with an elevated serum PSA level: impact on Gleason score for nonpalpable lesions. Urology 49:709–715
Cornud F, Hamida K, Flam T et al. (2000) Endorectal color Doppler sonography and endorectal MR imaging features of nonpalpable prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:1161–1168
Cvetkovic D, Movsas B, Dicker AP et al. (2001) Increased hypoxia correlates with increased expression of the angiogenesis marker vascular endothelial growth factor in human prostate cancer. Urology 57:821–825
Dang CV, Semenza GL (1999). Oncogenic alterations of metabolism. Trends Biochem Sci 24:68–72
Dayton PA, Morgan KE, Klibanov AL, Brandenburger GH, Ferrara KW (1999) Optical and acoustical observations of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control ; 46:220–232
Djavan B, Zlotta A, Kratzik C et al. (1999) PSA, PSA density, PSA density of transition zone, free/total PSA ratio, and PSA velocity for early detection of prostate cancer in men with serum PSA 2.5 to 4.0 L. Urology 54:517–522
Djavan B, Zlotta A, Remzi M et al. (2000) Optimal predictors of prostate cancer on repeat prostate biopsy: a prospective study of 1,051 men. J Urol 163:1144–1148; discussion 8–9
Djavan B, Mazal P, Zlotta A et al. (2001) Pathological features of prostate cancer detected on initial and repeat prostate biopsy: results of the prospective European Prostate Cancer Detection study. Prostate 47:111–117
Eckersley R, Cosgrove D, Blomley M, Hashimoto H (1998) Functional imaging of tissue response to bolus injection of ultrasound contrast agent. Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, Sendai, Japan, 1998, pp 1779–1782
Egawa S, Wheeler TM, Greene DR, Scardino PT (1992) Unusual hyperechoic appearance of prostate cancer on transrectal ultrasonography. Br J Urol 69:169–174
Engelbrecht MR, Barentsz JO, Jager GJ et al. (2000) Prostate cancer staging using imaging. BJU Int 86:123–134
Franco OE, Arima K, Yanagawa M, Kawamura J (2000) The usefulness of power Doppler ultrasonography for diagnosing prostate cancer: histological correlation of each biopsy site. BJU Int 85:1049–1052
Frauscher F, Klauser A, Volgger H et al. (2002) Comparison of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted biopsy with conventional systematic biopsy: impact on prostate cancer detection. J Urol 167:1648–1652
Goossen TEB, Sedelaar JPM, De la Rosette JJMCH, Van Leenders GJLH, Wijkstra H (2002) The value of dynamic contrast enhanced power Doppler ultrasound in the localization of prostate carcinoma. abstract 355, Eur Urol [Suppl 1]1:91
Halpern EJ, Verkh L, Forsberg F et al. (2000) Initial experience with contrast-enhanced sonography of the prostate. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1575–1580
Halpern EJ, Strup SE (2000) Using gray-scale and color and power Doppler sonography to detect prostatic cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 174:623–637
Halpern EJ, Rosenberg M, Gomella LG (2001) Prostate cancer: contrast-enhanced us for detection. Radiology 219:219–225
Hendrikx AJ, De la Rosette JJ, Van Helvoort-van Dommelen CA et al. (1990) Histological analysis of ultrasonic images of the prostate: an accurate technique. Ultrasound Med Biol 16:667–674
Hope Simpson D, Chin CT, Burns PN (1999) Pulse inversion Doppler: a new method for detecting nonlinear echoes from microbubble contrast agents. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 46:372–382
Kamiyama N, Moriyasu F, Mine Y, Goto Y (1999) Analysis of flash echo from contrast agent for designing optimal ultrasound diagnostic systems. Ultrasound Med Biol 25:411–420
Mathupala SP, Rempel A, Pedersen PL (2001) Glucose catabolism in cancer cells: identification and characterization of a marked activation response of the type II hexokinase gene to hypoxic conditions. J Biol Chem 276:43407–43412
Mitchell ID, Croal BL, Dickie A, Cohen NP, Ross I (2001) A prospective study to evaluate the role of complexed prostate specific antigen and free/total prostate specific antigen ratio for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. J Urol 165:1549–1553
Movsas B, Chapman JD, Horwitz EM et al. (1999) Hypoxic regions exist in human prostate carcinoma. Urology 53:11–18
Movsas B, Chapman JD, Greenberg RE et al. (2000) Increasing levels of hypoxia in prostate carcinoma correlate significantly with increasing clinical stage and patient age: an Eppendorf pO(2) study. Cancer 89:2018–2024
Norberg M, Egevad L, Holmberg L et al. (1997) The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. Urology 50:562–566
Okihara K, Kojima M, Nakanouchi T, Okada K, Miki T (2000) Transrectal power Doppler imaging in the detection of prostate cancer. BJU Int 85:1053–1057
Perrotti M, Pantuck A, Rabbani F, Israeli RS, Weiss RE (1999) Review of staging modalities in clinically localized prostate cancer. Urology 54:208–214
Roehrborn CG, Pickens GJ, Sanders JS (1996). Diagnostic yield of repeated transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies stratified by specific histopathologic diagnoses and prostate-specific antigen levels. Urology 47:347–352
Rubin MA, Buyyounouski M, Bagiella E et al. (1999) Microvessel density in prostate cancer: lack of correlation with tumor grade, pathologic stage, and clinical outcome. Urology 53:542–547
Sedelaar JP, Van Leenders GJ, Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa CA et al. (2001) Microvessel density: correlation between contrast ultrasonography and histology of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 40:285–293
Siegal JA, Yu E, Brawer MK (1995) Topography of neovascularity in human prostate carcinoma. Cancer 75:2545–2551
Silberman MA, Partin AW, Veltri RW, Epstein JI (1997) Tumor angiogenesis correlates with progression after radical prostatectomy but not with pathologic stage in Gleason sum 5 to 7 adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Cancer 79:772–779
Singh G, Lakkis CL, Laucirica R, Epner DE (1999) Regulation of prostate cancer cell division by glucose. J Cell Physiol ; 180:431–438
Shigeno K, Igawa M, Shiina H, Wada H, Yoneda T (2000) The role of colour Doppler ultrasonography in detecting prostate cancer. BJU Int 86:229–233
Shinohara K, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT (1989) The appearance of prostate cancer on transrectal ultrasonography: correlation of imaging and pathological examinations. J Urol 142:76–82
Tiemann K, Pohl C, Schlosser T et al. (2000) Stimulated acoustic emission: pseudo-Doppler shifts seen during the destruction of nonmoving microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol 26:1161–1167
Unal D, Sedelaar JP, Aarnink RG et al. (2000) Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasonography and conventional examination methods: the value of diagnostic predictors of prostate cancer. BJU Int 86:58–64
Wilkinson BA, Hamdy FC (2001) State-of-the-art staging in prostate cancer. BJU Int 87:423–430
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wijkstra, H., Wink, M.H. & de la Rosette, J.J.M.C.H. Contrast specific imaging in the detection and localization of prostate cancer. World J Urol 22, 346–350 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-004-0419-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-004-0419-7