Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Current Concepts in Clinical Surgery
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy today is the standard operation for all gall stone disease. Nevertheless, a number of questions are still being discussed: What are the optimal steps? Or, more important, is the laparoscopic technique really superior to the open procedure according to the criteria of evidence-based medicine? How should we proceed in case of an occult choledocholithiasis? Is intraoperative cholangiography mandatory, and does the concept for the treatment of silent gall stones need to be revised in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Method

Literature review.

Results

Eleven randomised studies show the superiority of the laparoscopic technique. Only one study shows no advantage provided the length of the incision in the open procedure is less than 8 cm. According to our own experience, up to 98% of all gall bladders can be removed laparoscopically when following the described standard technique, with a conversion rate of less than 1%. In the case of an occult choledocholithiasis the concept of “therapeutic splitting” has proved successful; the risk of a residual stone is below 1%. Routine intraoperative cholangiography is not cost effective. The risk of complications for a silent gall stone in the long term is higher than for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in young patients with incidental gall stones.

Conclusion

The laparoscopic technique has given new impulses to the surgery of the gall bladder and has proven to be an effective, patient-friendly alternative to open surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Langenbuch C (1882) Ein Fall von Exstirpation der Gallenblase wegen chronischer Cholelithiasis. Heilung. Berlin, Klin Wochenschr 19:725

  2. Mühe E (1986) Die erste Cholecystektomie durch das Laparoskop. Langenbecks Arch Chir 369 (Kongressbericht 69):804

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mouret P (1991) From the first laparoscopic cholecystectomy to the frontiers of laparoscopic surgery: the future prospectives. Dig Surg 8:124

    Google Scholar 

  4. Trondsen E, Reiertsen O, Andersen OK, Kjaersgaard P (1993) Laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study. Eur J Surg 159:217–221

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berggren U, Gordh T, Grama D, Haglund U, Rastad J, Arvidsson D (1994) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: hospitalization, sick leave, analgesia and trauma responses. Br J Surg 81:1362–1365

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McMahon AJ, Russell IT, Baxter JN, Ross S, Anderson JR, Morran CG, Sunderland G, Galloway D, Ramsay G, O’Dwyer PJ (1994) Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomized trial. Lancet 343:135–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McMahon AJ, Russell IT, Ramsay G, Sunderland G, Baxter JN, Anderson JR, Galloway D, O’Dwyer PJ (1994) Laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and pulmonary function. Surgery 115:533–539

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kiviluoto T, Siren J, Luukkonen P, Kivilaakso E (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis. Lancet 351:321–325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanz-Lopez R, Martinez.-Ramos C, Nunez-Pena JR, Ruiz de Gopegui M, Pastor-Sirera L, Tamames-Escobar S (1999) Incisional hernias after laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 13:922–924

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Barkun JS, Barkun AN, Meakins JL (1993) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: the Canadian experience. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group. Am J Surg 165:455–458

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang SM, Wu CW, Lui WY, P’eng FK (1996) A prospective randomised study of laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy in aged patients with cholecystolithiasis. S Afr J Surg 34:177–179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hendolin HI, Paakonen ME, Alhava EM, Tarvainen R, Kemppinen T, Lahtinen P (2000) Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function and stress response. Eur J Surg 166:394–399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ros A, Gustafsson L, Krook H, Nordgren CE, Thorell A, Wallin G, Nilsson E (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Ann Surg 234:741–749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Squirrell DM, Majeed AW, Troy G, Peacock JE, Nicholl JP, Johnson AG (1998) A randomized, prospective, blinded comparison of postoperative pain, metabolic response and perceived health after laparoscopic and small incision cholecystectomy. Surgery 123:485–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schweins M, Edelmann M (1997) Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Chirurg 68:613–617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hollington P, Toogood GJ, Padbury RT (1999) A prospective randomized trial of day-stay only versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Aust N Z J Surg 69:841–843

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Secco GB, Cataletti M, Bonfante P, Baldi E, Davini MD, Biasotti B, Ravera G, Ferraris R (2002) Laparoscopic versus mini-cholecystectomy: analysis of hospitals costs and social costs in a prospective randomized study. Chir Ital 54:685–692

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Majeed AW, Troy G, Nicholl JP, Smythe A, Reed MWR, Stoddard CJ, Peacock J, Johnson AG (1996) Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy. Lancet 347:989–994

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fullarton GM, Darling K, Williams J, MacMillan R, Bell G (1994) Evaluation of the cost of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 81:124–126

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hüttl TP, Hrdina C, Krämling HJ, Schildberg FW, Meyer G (2001) Gallstone surgery in German university hospitals. Development, complications and changing strategies. Langenbecks Arch Surg 386:410–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ludwig K, Köckerling F, Hohenberger W, Lorenz D (2001) Die chirurgische Therapie der Cholecysto-/Choledocholithiasis. Ergebnisse einer deutschlandweiten Umfrage an 859 Kliniken und 123 090 Cholecystektomien. Chirurg 72:1171–1178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ulrich M, Nick G, Kraft K, Leibl BJ, Bittner R (2001) Akute Cholecystitis: Gibt es Grenzen für den laparoskopischen Eingriff? Chir Gastroenterol 17:147–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Truong S, Jansen M, Willis S, Neuerburg J, Schraven C, Schumpelick V (1997) Preoperative diagnosis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Is there an indication for routine intravenous cholangiography? Langenbecks Arch Chir 382:302–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sarli L, Pietra N, Franzè A, Colla G, Costi R, Gobbi S, Trivelli M (1999) Routine intravenous cholangiography, selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and endoscopic treatment of common bile duct before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 50:200–208

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sarli L, Costi R, Gobbi S, Isuca D, Sgobba G, Roncoroni L (2003) Scoring system to predict asymptomatic choledocholithiasis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A matched case–control study. Surg Endosc 17:1396–1403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Erickson RA, Carlson B (1995) The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Gastroenterology 109:252–263

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Davids PH, Ringers J, Rauws EA, DeWit LT, Huibregtse K, van der Heyde MN, Tgtgat GN (1993) Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopacreatography. Gut 34:1250–1254

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Leibl BJ, Ulrich M, Scheuritzel U, Wellhäusser U, Schmidt W, Marquardt B, Hass K, Metzger H, Bittner R (2001) Selective pre-, intra- and postoperative bile duct diagnosis—an efficient and low complication regimen within the scope of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Early and late results of a prospective study. Chirurg 72:812–817

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Charfare H, Cheslyn-Curtis S (2000) Selective cholangiography in 600 patients undergoing cholecystectomy with 5 year follow-up for residual bile duct stones. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85:167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Soper NG, Dunnegan DL (1992) Routine versus selective intra-operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 16:1133–1140

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nies C, Bauknecht F, Groth C, Clerici T, Bartsch D, Lange J, Rothmund M (1997) Intraoperative cholangiography as a routine method? A prospective, controlled, randomized study. Chirurg 68:892–897

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Williams LF, Chapman WC, Bonau RA, McGee EC Jr, Boyd RW, Jacobs JK (1993) Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with open cholecystectomy in a single center. Am J Surg 165:459–465

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Southern Surgical Club (1991) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 325:1517–1518

    Google Scholar 

  34. Davidoff AM, Pappas TM, Murray EA, Hilleron DJ, Johnson RD, Baker ME, Newman GE, Cotton PB, Meyers WC (1992) Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 215:196–202

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Manson JM (2000) Intraoperative cholangiography and bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 14:94–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Moynihan B (1908) An address on inaugural symptoms. BMJ 2:1597–1601

    Google Scholar 

  37. Max MH, Polk HC Jr (1977) Routine preoperative upper gastrointestinal series (UGIS) in patients with biliary tract disease: a plea for more selectivity. Surgery 82:334–336

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rossek D, Osswald J, Stock W (1998) Routine gastroscopy before cholecystectomy. Chirurg 59:335–337

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ure BM, Spangenberger W, Lefering R, Dietrich A, Troidl H (1992) Routine gastroscopy before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: evaluation of the technology in 376 patients. Z Gastroenterol 30:529–533

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yavorski CC, Acosta JA, Ragland JJ (1995) Precholecystectomy esophagogastroduodenoscopy: is it of value? Am Surg 61:1032–1034

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kruis W, Roehrig H, Hardt M, Pohl C, Schlosser D (1997) A prospective evaluation of the diagnostic work-up before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy 29:602–608

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fahlke J, Ridwelski K, Manger T, Grote R, Lippert H (2001) Diagnostic workup before laparoscopic cholecystectomy—which diagnostic tools should be used? Hepatogastroenterology 48:59–65

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dubois F, Berthelot G, Levard H (1989) Cholecystectomy par coelioscopie. Presse Med 18:980

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Dubois F, Icard P, Berthelot G, Levard H (1990) Coelioscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 211:60

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Dubois F, Berthelot G, Levard H (1995) Coelioscopic cholecystectomy: experience with 2006 cases. World J Surg 19:748

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gracie WA, Ransohoff DR (1983) The silent stone requiescat in pace. In: Delaney JP, Varco RL (eds) Controversies in surgery II. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 361–370

  47. Mayo WJ (1911) “Innocent” gallstones a myth. J Am Med Assoc 56:1021–1024

    Google Scholar 

  48. Glenn F (1983) Silent or asymptomatic gallstones. In: Delaney JP, Varco RL (eds) Controversies in surgery II. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 356–361

  49. Ransohoff DF, Gracie WA, Wolfenson LB, Neuhauser D (1983) Prophylactic cholecystectomy or expectant management for silent gallstones. Ann Intern Med 99:199–204

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Attili AF, DeSantis A, Capri R, Repice AM, Maselli S, The GREPCO Group (1995) The natural history of gallstones: the GREPCO experience. Hepatology 21:656–660

    Google Scholar 

  51. Friedmann GD, Raviola CA, Fireman B (1989) Prognosis of gallstones with mild or no symptoms: 25 years of follow-up in a health maintenance organization. J Clin Epidemiol 42:127–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Patiño JF, Quintero GA (1998) Asymptomatic cholelithiasis revisited. World J Surg 22:1119–1124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Marienhospital, Boeheimstrasse 37, 70199, Stuttgart, Germany

    R. Bittner

Authors
  1. R. Bittner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Bittner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bittner, R. The standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389, 157–163 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-004-0471-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-004-0471-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation