Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Management strategies for patients with nipple discharge

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

The aim of this study was to assess management strategies for patients with nipple discharge (ND).

Patients and methods

The records of 13,443 women with breast-related complaints who were examined by the same surgeon between 1 January 1960 and 31 December 2000 were retrospectively assessed. Patients with ND were grouped according to whether they had had a spontaneous or provoked discharge. The parameters investigated in each group were age, physical findings, number of pregnancies, duration of lactation, duration of discharge, colour of discharge, and histopathological features. Chi-square and Mann–Whitney U-tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results

ND was the presenting symptom in 603 (4.5%) of the cases. Two hundred and eighty-seven (48%) of the 603 patients showed spontaneous nipple discharge (SND group) and the other 316 (52%) showed provoked nipple discharge (PND group). In the SND group, 124 (43%) tissue specimens were obtained by either biopsy or sub-areolar exploration. Histopathological examination revealed that the most frequent causes of ND in these cases were intraductal papilloma (49 patients; 40%), intraductal carcinoma (35 patients; 28%), and cystic disease (15 patients; 12%). Twenty tissue specimens were obtained from the group with PND. In these cases, the most frequently identified causes of ND were cystic disease (seven patients; 35%), intraductal papilloma (six patients; 30%), ductal ectasia (two patients; 10%), and carcinoma (one patient; 5%). The SND and PND groups differed significantly with respect to age (P=0.001) and duration of ND (P=0.008). The incidence of cancer was higher in the SND specimens than in the PND specimens (28% vs 5%, respectively; P=0.01). The number of pregnancies was significantly higher and the duration of lactation was significantly longer in the SND group (P=0.03 and P=0.02, respectively).

Conclusion

The study confirms previous reports that patients with SND have a higher incidence of carcinoma than those with PND. The results suggest that older age, higher number of pregnancies, and longer duration of lactation may predispose to cancer development in patients with SND. The possibility of breast cancer should also be kept in mind when one is assessing patients with PND. Careful physical examination and close follow-up is the optimal management strategy for patients with any type of ND.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Data obtained from the personal series of Dr Husnu A. Goksel with his permission

References

  1. Leis HP (1989) Management of nipple discharge. World J Surg 13:736–742

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gulay H, Bora S, Kilicturgay S (1994) Management of nipple discharge. J Am Coll Surg 178:471–474

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dawes LG, Bowen C, Venta LA, Morrow M (1998) Ductography for nipple discharge: no replacement for ductal excision. Surgery 124:685–691

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Piccoli CW, Feig SA, Vala MA (1998) Breast imaging of the day. Radiographics 18:783–786

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McLaughlin CW, Coe JD (1963) A study of nipple discharge in the non-lactating breast. Ann Surg 157:810–816

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shen KW, Wu J, Lu JS (2001) Fiberoptic ductoscopy for breast cancer patients with nipple discharge. Surg Endosc 15:1340–1345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Orel SG, Dougherty CS, Reynolds C (2000) MR imaging in patients with nipple discharge: initial experience. Radiology 216:248–254

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morrow M (2000) The evaluation of common breast problems. Am Fam Physician 61:2371–2378

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jardines L (1996) Management of nipple discharge. Am Surg 62:119–122

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Flario MG, Manganaro T, Pollicina A (1999) Surgical approach to nipple discharge: a ten-year experience. J Surg Oncol 71:235–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Haagensen CD, Bodian C, Haagensen DA (1981) Breast carcinoma, risk and detection. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 146–149

    Google Scholar 

  12. Devitt JE (1989) False alarms for breast cancer. Lancet 2:1257–1258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. King TA, Carter KM, Bolton JS, Fuhrman GM (2000) A simple approach to nipple discharge. Am Surg 66:960–965

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Azzopardi JG (1979) Problems in breast pathology. Saunders, London, pp 150–239

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kraus FT, Neubecker RD (1962) The differential diagnosis of papillary tumours of the breast. Cancer 15:444–455

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Haagensen CD (1986) Diseases of the breast. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 136–174

    Google Scholar 

  17. Carter D (1977) Intraductal papillary tumors of the breast: a study of 78 cases. Cancer 39:1689–1692

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Page DL, Salhany KE, Jensen RA, Dupont WD (1996) Subsequent breast carcinoma risk after biopsy with atypia in a breast papilloma. Am Cancer Soc 78:258–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng T, Holford TR, Mayne ST (2001) Lactation and breast cancer risk: a case control study in Connecticut. Br J Cancer 84:1472–1476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Purwanto H, Sadjimin T, Dwiprahatso I (2000) Lactation and the risk of breast cancer. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 27[Suppl 2]:474–481

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wohlfahrt J, Andersen PK, Mouridsen HT, Melbye M (2001) Risk of late-stage breast cancer after a childbirth. Am J Epidemiol 153:1079–1084

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Peck JD, Hulka BS, Poole C (2002) Steroid hormone levels during pregnancy and incidence of maternal breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:361–368

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Surbone A (2001) Too early to say that pregnancy has an antitumor effect on breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:3707–3708

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Surbone A, Petrek JA (1997) Childbearing issues in breast carcinoma survivors. Cancer 79:1271–1278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Surbone A, Petrek JA (1998) Pregnancy after breast cancer. The relationship of pregnancy to breast cancer development and progression. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 27:169–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fentiman IS (2001) Fixed and modifiable risk factors for breast cancer. Int J Clin Pract 55:527–530

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. State D (1991) Nipple discharge in women. Is it cause for concern? Postgrad Med 89:65–68

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cheung KL, Alagaratnam TT (1997) A review of nipple discharge in Chinese women. J R Coll Surg Edinb 42:179–181

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Haberal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goksel, H.A., Yagmurdur, M.C., Demirhan, B. et al. Management strategies for patients with nipple discharge. Langenbecks Arch Surg 390, 52–58 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-004-0515-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-004-0515-6

Keywords

Navigation