Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bleeding remains a major complication during laparoscopic surgery: analysis of the SALTS database

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of bleeding complications from various laparoscopic procedures in a nationwide prospective multicentre study in Switzerland from 1995 to 2001 following an initial learning curve.

Patients and methods

Since 1989, the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery (SALTS) has prospectively collected data from patients undergoing laparoscopic or thoracoscopic surgery at 114 surgical institutions (university, county and district hospitals, private practice). More than 130 items of data, including indication for surgery, intraoperative course, local as well as general postoperative complications, mortality and follow-up were recorded on a computerised data sheet.

Results

Some 43,028 procedures were assessed and analysed. Local morbidity (e.g. wound infections) occurred in 0.05% of the whole patient group, whereas 3.3% developed general postoperative complications. The overall mortality rate was 0.2%. In 1.7% of the cases, the intraoperative course was complicated by internal bleeding or haematoma of the abdominal wall. In the postoperative course, 1.5% of the patients presented with internal bleeding or bleeding of the abdominal wall. Major vascular injury occurred in 0.09%. This patient group with bleeding complications was analysed in the context of the operator’s experience, instrumental lesions (Veress needle or trocar) and conversion incidence. Furthermore, a trend analysis of the complication rate from 1995 to 2001 was performed.

Conclusion

Although the initial learning curve of laparoscopic procedures is probably finished, the rate of bleeding complications is still substantial. These results demonstrate that the collection of data in the form of multicentre studies is essential for quality control. It permits recognition and understanding of the current problems in laparoscopic surgery in order to improve the quality of daily surgical practice. The fact that the operator’s experience seems to play an important role shows that improvement in learning and teaching programmes is still necessary and should be coordinated on a national basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shea JA, Healey M, Berlin J, Clarke J, Malet P, Staroscik R, Schartz S, Williams S (1998) Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a metaanlaysis. Ann Surg 224:609–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hashizume H, Sugimachi K (1997) Study group on endoscopic surgery needle and trocar injury during laparoscopic surgery in Japan. Surg Endosc 11:1198–1201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Champault G, Cazacu F, Taffinder N (1996) Serious trocar accidents in laparoscopic surgery: a French survey of 103,852 operations. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6:367–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Deziel DJ, Millikan WK, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC (1993) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 165:9–14

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roviaro GC, Varoli F, Saguatti L, Vergani C, Maciocco M, Scarduelli A (2002) Major vascular injuries in laparoscopic surgery. Still of interest? Surg Endosc 16:1192–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sigman HH, Fried GM, Garzon J, Hinchey EJ, Wexler MJ, Meakins Barkun JS (1993) Risks of blind versus open approach to celiotomy for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3:296–299

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fruhwirth J, Koch G, Mischinger HJ, Werkgartner G, Tesch NP (1997) Vascular complications in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc 7:251–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Usal H, Sayad P, Hayek N, Hallak A, Huie F, Ferzli G (1998) Major vascular injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 12:960–962

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Geers J, Holden C (1996) Major vascular injury as a complication of laparoscopic surgery: a report of three cases and review of the literature. Am Surg 62:377–379

    Google Scholar 

  10. Härkki-Siren P, Kurki T (1997) A nationwide analysis of laparoscopic complications. Obstet Gynecol 89:108–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cogliandolo A, Manganaro T, Saitta FP, Micali B (1998) Blind versus open approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized study. Laparosc Endosc Surg 8:353–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mayol J, Garcia Aguilar J, Ortiz Oshiro E, De Diego Carmona JA, Fernandez Represa JA (1997) Risks of the minimal access approach for laparoscopic surgery: multivariate analysis of morbidity related to umbilical trocar insertion. World J Surg 21:529–533

    Google Scholar 

  13. Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Huegel O, Bärlehner R, Konradt K, Wittekind C, Köckerling F (2002) Laparoscopic sigmoid resection for cancer. Curative resection and preliminary medium-term results. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1641–1647

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Merlin TL, Hiller JE, Maddern GJ, Jamieson GG, Brown AR, Kolbe A (2003) Systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 90:668–679

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schäfer M, Lauper M, Krähenbühl L (2000) A nation’s experience of bleeding complications during laparoscopy. Am J Surg 180:73–77

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wherry DC, Marohn MR, Malanoski MP, Hetz SP, Rich NM (1996) An external audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the steady state performed in medical treatment facilities of the Department of Defense. Ann Surg 224:145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Loffler FD, Pent D (1975) Indication, contraindications, and complications of laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol Surg 30:407–427

    Google Scholar 

  18. McDonald PT, Rich NM, Collins GJ, Anderson CA, Kozloff L (1978) Vascular trauma secondary to diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: laparoscopy. Am J Surg 135:651–655

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chapron CM, Pierre F, Lacroix S, Querleu D, Lansac J, Dubuisson J (1997) Major vascular injuries during gynecologic laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 185:461–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Penfield AJ (1997) Trocar and needle injury. In: Philips JM (ed) Laparoscopy. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 236–241

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bonjer HJ, Hazebroek EJ, Kazemier G, Giuffrida MC, Meijer WS, Lange JF (1997) Open versus closed establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 84:599–602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Balzer KM, Witte H, Recknagel S, Kozinaka J, Waleczek H (1999) Anatomic guidelines for the prevention of abdominal wall hematoma induced by trocar placement. Surg Radiol Anat 21:87–89

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hanney RM, Carmalt HL, Merret N, Tait N (1999) Use of the Hasson cannula producing major vascular injury at laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 13:1238–1240

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hulka J, Peterson H, Phillips J, Surrey M (1995) Operative laparoscopy: American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists’ 1993 Membership Survey. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2:133–136

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sutton C (1992) Operative laparoscopy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 4:430–438

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Hôpital Cantonal, 1708, Fribourg, Switzerland

    Isabelle Opitz, Urs Giger & Lukas Krähenbühl

  2. St. Anna Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland

    Walter Gantert

  3. Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland

    Thomas Kocher

Authors
  1. Isabelle Opitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Walter Gantert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Urs Giger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thomas Kocher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lukas Krähenbühl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

for the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery (SALTS) Study Group

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lukas Krähenbühl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Opitz, I., Gantert, W., Giger, U. et al. Bleeding remains a major complication during laparoscopic surgery: analysis of the SALTS database. Langenbecks Arch Surg 390, 128–133 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-004-0538-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-004-0538-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation