Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the impact of a standardized technique of pancreaticojejunostomy

  • Current Concepts in Clinical Surgery
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The leading cause for morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy is a pancreatic anastomotic leak and fistula. The two most commonly performed anastomoses after pancreaticoduodenectomy are pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) and pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ). The role of standardization on outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy has not been sufficiently addressed.

Aim

The goal is to study the impact of a standardized technique of pancreatic anastomosis (PJ) after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a tertiary referral cancer teaching hospital.

Materials and methods

A single-institution database was analyzed over 15 years. The entire data were subdivided into two periods, viz., period A (1992 to 2001), when PG (dunking) was predominantly used, and period B (2003–2007), when a standardized technique of PJ (duct to mucosa) was employed.

Results

There were 144 pancreaticoduodenectomies performed during period A with a pancreatic fistula rate of 16%. During period B, 123 pancreaticoduodenectomies were performed with a pancreatic fistula rate of 3.2% (p < 0.0005).

Conclusions

It appears that a standardized approach to the pancreatic anastomosis and a consistent practice of a single technique can help to reduce the incidence of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Trede M, Schwall G, Saegar H (1990) Survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 211:447–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, Lillemoe KD, Kaufman HS, Coleman J (1993) One hundred and forty five consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg 217:430–438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenberg L, MacNeil P, Turnacioglu K (1999) Economic evaluation of the use of octreotide for prevention of complications following pancreatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 3:225–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jagannath P, Shrikhande SV (2003) Current options in the diagnosis and management of Periampullary carcinoma. Ind J Surg 65:347–353

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jagannath P, Dhir V, Shrikhande SV, Shah RC, Mullerpatan P, Mohandas KM (2005) Effect of preoperative biliary stenting on immediate outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 92:356–361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Z’graggen K, Uhl W, Friess H, Buchler MW (2002) How to do a safe pancreatic anastomosis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:733–737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kotwall CA, Maxwell JG, Brinker CC, Koch GG, Covington DL (2002) National estimates of mortality rates for radical pancreaticoduodenectomy in 25,000 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 9:847–854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL (2003) Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 349:2117–2127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler MW (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shrikhande VN, Shrikhande SV, Shukla PJ (2004) Pancreatic Cancer: Recent Advances. In: RL Gupta (ed) Recent advances in surgery, vol. 9. Jaypee Publishing, New Delhi, pp 250–262

    Google Scholar 

  11. Friess H, Boenert M, Shrikhande SV, Berberat P, Wirtz M, Buechler M (2002) Management of Complications following Pancreaticoduodenectomy. In: Jagannath P (ed) HPB current concepts. Churchill Livingstone, New Delhi, pp 209–222

    Google Scholar 

  12. Balachandran P, Sikora SS, Raghavendra Rao RV, Kumar A, Saxena R, Kapoor VK (2004) Haemorrhagic complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy. ANZ J Surg 74:945–950

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, Sauter PK, Zahurak ML, Talamini MA, Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA (1995) A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 222:580–588

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, Salvia R, Butturini G, Sartori N, Mantovani W, Pederzoli P (2005) Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy. Results of a comparative study. Ann Surg 242:767–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Duffas JP, Suc B, Msika S, Fourtanier G, Muscari F, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Millat B, Radovanowic A, Fagniez PL (2005) A controlled randomized multicenter trial pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg 189:720–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Buchler MW, Friess H, Wagner M, Kulli C, Wagener V, Z’graggen K (2000) Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg 87:883–889

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kapur BM, Misra MC, Seenu V, Goel AK (1998) Pancreaticogastrostomy for reconstruction of pancreatic stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma. Am J Surg 176:274–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Asopa HS, Garg M, Singhal GG, Singh L, Asopa J (2002) Pancreaticojejunostomy with invagination of spatulated pancreatic stump into a jejunal pouch. Am J Surg 183:138–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Peng S, Mou Y, Cai X, Peng C (2002) Binding pancreaticojejunostomy is a new technique to minimize leakage. Am J Surg 183:283–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schlitt HJ, Schmidt U, Simunec D, Jager M, Aselmann H, Neipp M, Piso P (2002) Morbidity and mortality associated with pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatojejunostomy following partial pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 89:1245–1251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shrikhande SV, Qureshi SS, Rajneesh N, Shukla PJ (2005) Pancreatic anastomoses after pancreaticoduodenectomy: do we need further studies? World J Surg 29:1642–1649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McKay A, Mackenzie S, Sutherland FR, Bathe OF, Doig C, Dort J, Vollmer CM Jr, Dixon E (2006) Meta-analysis of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 93:929–936

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wente MN, Shrikhande SV, Muller MW, Diener MK, Seiler CM, Friess H, Buchler MW (2007) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg 193:171–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shailesh V. Shrikhande.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shrikhande, S.V., Barreto, G. & Shukla, P.J. Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the impact of a standardized technique of pancreaticojejunostomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393, 87–91 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-007-0221-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-007-0221-2

Keywords

Navigation