Skip to main content
Log in

Variability of surgical knot tying techniques: do we need to standardize?

  • Training and Education in Surgery
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Knot tying is regarded as a basic surgical skill. However, there is no consensus in the literature on the best/safest technique. The aim of this study was to survey the various techniques used by German surgeons at the different stages of their training.

Materials and methods

A knot tying technique was defined based on three criteria, i.e., both thread ends are crossed at the beginning at least two throws tied pulling at the same free end of the thread (standing part) and at least one knot tied changing the standing part. The knot tying techniques of 192 randomly chosen German surgeons practicing in 102 different hospitals were compared against this standard. Besides the status of the participating surgeons, the type of hospital in which they were currently working was recorded.

Results

Of the192 participants, 69 were consultants, 56 fellows, and 67 residents. Forty-three surgeons (22.4%) worked in primary care centers (PCC), 81 (42.2%) in secondary care centers (SCC), and 68 (35.4%) in tertiary care centers (TCC). 62.5% crossed both thread ends at the beginning, 75.5% performed at least two identical throws keeping the same standing part, and 45.3% changed the standing part. Assessed against the technique defined as standard, 19.8% of all surgeons performed similar surgical knots. Even though consultants crossed both thread ends at the beginning and changed the standing part significantly more often (p = 0.007 and p = 0.031 respectively, Fisher’s exact test), the overall rate of identical knots was independent of the status of participants and the type of hospital (p > 0.1, Fisher’s exact test).

Conclusion

This explorative study detected a high variability of knot tying techniques among German surgeons. In the absence of any evidence of the superiority of one particular technique, continuing education should focus on the quality of each single knot and perfect the details of the technique used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Abbreviations

PCC:

Primary care center

SCC:

Secondary care center

TCC:

Tertiary care center

References

  1. Barnes RW, Lang NP, Whiteside MF (1989) Halstedian technique revisited. Innovations in teaching surgical skills. Ann Surg 210:118–121

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nockemann PF (1992) Die chirurgische Naht. Georg Thiema Verlag Stuttgart, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tytherleigh MG, Bhatti TS, Watkins RM, Wilkins DC (2001) The assessment of surgical skills and a simple knot-tying exercise. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 83:69–73

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Beard JD, Jolly BC, Newble DI, Thomas WE, Donnelly J, Southgate LJ (2005) Assessing the technical skills of surgical trainees. Br J Surg 92:778–782

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Trimbos JB, Brohim R, van Rijssel EJ (1989) Factors relating to the volume of surgical knots. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 30:355–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van Rijssel EJ, Trimbos JB, Booster MH (1990) Mechanical performance of square knots and sliding knots in surgery: comparative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:93–97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shaw AD, Duthie GS (1995) A simple assessment of surgical sutures and knots. J R Coll Surg Edinb 40:388–391

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown RP (1992) Knotting technique and suture materials. Br J Surg 79:399–400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gunderson PE (1987) The half-hitch knot: a rational alternative to the square knot. Am J Surg 154:538–540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jha PK, Barabas AG, Sharma H (2007) Surgical technique. The ambidextrous surgeon’s knot: an alternate way to tie the surgeon’s knot. Can J Surg 50:470–471

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tera H, Aberg C (1976) Tensile strengths of twelve types of knot employed in surgery, using different suture materials. Acta Chir Scand 142:1–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zimmer CA, Thacker JG, Powell DM, Bellian KT, Becker DG, Rodeheaver GT, Edlich RF (1991) Influence of knot configuration and tying technique on the mechanical performance of sutures. J Emerg Med 9:107–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Richey ML, Roe SC (2005) Assessment of knot security in continuous intradermal wound closures. J Surg Res 123:284–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ivy JJ, Unger JB, Hurt J, Mukherjee D (2004) The effect of number of throws on knot security with nonidentical sliding knots. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:1618–1620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Behm T, Unger JB, Ivy JJ, Mukherjee D (2007) Flat square knots: are 3 throws enough? Am J Obstet Gynecol 197:172–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hassinger SM, Wongworawat MD, Hechanova JW (2006) Biomechanical characteristics of 10 arthroscopic knots. Arthroscopy 22:827–832

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Burkhart SS, Wirth MA, Simonich M, Salem D, Lanctot D, Athanasiou K (2000) Knot security in simple sliding knots and its relationship to rotator cuff repair: how secure must the knot be? Arthroscopy 16:202–207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Murphy DL (2001) Endoscopic suturing and knot tying: theory into practice. Ann Surg 234:607–612

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharp HT, Dorsey JH (1997) The 4-S modification of the Roeder knot: how to tie it. Obstet Gynecol 90:1004–1006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Amortegui JD, Restrepo H (2002) Knot security in laparoscopic surgery. A comparative study with conventional knots. Surg Endosc 16:1598–1602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nottage WM, Lieurance RK (1999) Arthroscopic knot typing techniques. Arthroscopy 15:515–521

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee AC, Fahmy RR, Hanna GB (2008) Objective evidence for optimum knot configuration. World J Surg 32:2736–2741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schaffer SR (1984) The surgeon’s knot tied with one hand. Surg Gynecol Obstet 159:171–172

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ullman PM (1992) A new double-turn one-hand knot. Surg Gynecol Obstet 175:178–180

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stott PM, Ripley LG, Lavelle MA (2007) The ultimate Aberdeen knot. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89:713–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Arias J, Aller MA, Arias J (2000) A new technique for tying the surgeon’s knot. Eur J Surg 166:577–578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Alzacko SM, Majid OW (2007) "Security loop" tie: a new technique to overcome loosening of surgical knots. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104:e1–e4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dinsmore RC (1995) Understanding surgical knot security: a proposal to standardize the literature. J Am Coll Surg 180:689–699

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Trimbos JB (1984) Security of various knots commonly used in surgical practice. Obstet Gynecol 64:274–280

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Aanning HL, Haas T, Jorgensen DR, Wulf CA (2007) Square not a running knot. J Am Coll Surg 204:422–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Thomas RE, Crutcher R, Lorenzetti D (2007) A systematic review of the methodological quality and outcomes of RCTs to teach medical undergraduates surgical and emergency procedures. Can J Surg 50:278–290

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rogers DA, Regehr G, Howdieshell TR, Yeh KA, Palm E (2000) The impact of external feedback on computer-assisted learning for surgical technical skill training. Am J Surg 179:341–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rogers DA, Regehr G, Yeh KA, Howdieshell TR (1998) Computer-assisted learning versus a lecture and feedback seminar for teaching a basic surgical technical skill. Am J Surg 175:508–510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Holmlund DE (1974) Knot properties of surgical suture materials. Method study. Eur Surg Res 6:65–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Snow SN, Dortzbach R, Moyer D (1991) Managing common suturing problems. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 17:502–508

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim JC, Lee YK, Lim BS, Rhee SH, Yang HC (2007) Comparison of tensile and knot security properties of surgical sutures. J Mater Sci Mater Med 18:2363–2369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Brouwers JE, Oosting H, de HD, Klopper PJ (1991) Dynamic loading of surgical knots. Surg Gynecol Obstet 173:443–448

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Batra EK, Taylor PT, Franz DA, Towler MA, Edlich RF (1993) A portable tensiometer for assessing surgeon’s knot tying technique. Gynecol Oncol 48:114–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rodeheaver GT, Green CW, Odum BC, Bussard GM, Edlich RF (1998) Technical considerations in knot construction, part III. Knot asymmetry. J Emerg Med 16:635–639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schubert DC, Unger JB, Mukherjee D, Perrone JF (2002) Mechanical performance of knots using braided and monofilament absorbable sutures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:1438–1440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Heermann JB (1971) Tensile strenght and knot security of surgical suture materials. Am J Surg 37:209–217

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lunstedt B, Debus S, Thiede A (1993) Healing of the anastomosis in various suture techniques in the gastrointestinal tract. Physiology, experimental and clinical results. Zentralbl Chir 118:1–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Knaebel HP, Koch M, Sauerland S, Diener MK, Buchler MW, Seiler CM (2005) Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures—design of a multi-centre randomised trial to evaluate abdominal closure techniques INSECT-trial [ISRCTN24023541]. BMC Surg 5:3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hurt J, Unger JB, Ivy JJ, Mukherjee D, Pizzaro A (2005) Tying a loop-to-strand suture: is it safe? Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1094–1097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ind TE, Shelton JC, Shepherd JH (2001) Influence of training on reliability of surgical knots. BJOG 108:1013–1016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Trimbos JB, van Rijssel EJ, Klopper PJ (1986) Performance of sliding knots in monofilament and multifilament suture material. Obstet Gynecol 68:425–430

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Revington P, Bowyer RC (1994) Sutures: the economics of knot tying techniques. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 76:281

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Thust W (1997) Jetzt 343556 Ärztinnen und Ärzte. Deutsches Ärzteblatt, Supplement 94:3–19

    Google Scholar 

  49. Deutsche Krankenhausgesellschaft. Krankenhausstatistik. www.dkgev.de/dkg.php/aid/3455/cat/62. 23-10-2007. Ref type: data file

  50. Bundesärztekammer (2005) Die ärztliche Versorgung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Online]

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Fischer.

Additional information

Hanns-Peter Knaebel is currently the CEO of Aesculap AG, Germany. The authors have no other involvement, financial or otherwise, that might potentially bias their work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischer, L., Bruckner, T., Müller-Stich, B.P. et al. Variability of surgical knot tying techniques: do we need to standardize?. Langenbecks Arch Surg 395, 445–450 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0575-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0575-8

Keywords

Navigation