Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantitative phase microscopy: a new tool for measurement of cell culture growth and confluency in situ

  • Instruments and Techniques
  • Published:
Pflügers Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantitative phase microscopy (QPM) is a recently developed computational approach that provides quantitative phase measurements of specimen images obtained under bright-field conditions without phase- or interference-contrast optics. To perform QPM, an in-focus bright-field image is acquired, together with one positive and one negative de-focus image. An algorithm is then applied to produce a specimen phase map. In this investigation we demonstrate that manipulation of the phase map intensity histogram using novel, non-subjective thresholding and segmentation methods provides enhanced delineation of cells in culture. QPM was utilised to measure the growth behaviour of cultured airway smooth muscle cells over a 92-h period. There was a high degree of correlation between parallel QPM-derived confluency measurements and haemocytometry-derived counts of airway smooth muscle cells over this time period. Using QPM, translucent cells can be visualised with improved cell boundary definition allowing precise and reproducible measurements of cell culture confluency. Quantitative phase imaging provides a rapid, optically simple and non-destructive approach for measurement of cellular morphology. Further development of the QPM-based analysis methodology has the potential to provide even more refined measures of cellular growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1A–C
Fig. 2A–D
Fig. 3A, B
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abro E, Griffiths CD, Morgan TO, Delbridge LMD (2001) Regression of cardiac hypertrophy in the SHR by combined renin-angiotensin system blockade and dietary sodium restriction. J Renin Ang Aldo Sys 2:S148–S153

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Allman BE, McMahon PJ, Nugent KA, Paganin D, Jacobson DL, Arif M, Werner SA (2000) Imaging-phase radiography with neutrons. Nature 408:158–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Allman BE, Nassis L, von Bibra ML, Bellair CJ, Kabbara AA, Barone-Nugent E, Gaeth AP, Delbridge LMD, Nugent KA (2002) Optical phase microscopy: quantitative imaging and conventional phase analogs. Microsc Anal 52:13–15

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barone-Nugent ED, Barty A, Nugent KA (2002) Quantitative phase amplitude microscopy I. Optical microscopy. J Microsc 206:194–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barty A, Nugent KA, Roberts A, Paganin D (1998) Quantitative phase microscopy. Opt Lett 23:817–819

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bellair CJ, Curl CL, Allman BE, Harris PJ, Roberts A, Delbridge LMD, Nugent KA (2004) Quantitative phase amplitude microscopy IV. Imaging thick specimens. J Microsc (In Press)

  7. Delbridge LMD, Kabbara AA, Bellair CJ, Allman BE, Nassis L, Roberts A, Nugent KA (2002) Quantitative phase imaging—a new way to ‘see’ cells. Today’s Life Science 14:28–32

  8. Fernandes DJ, Guida E, Kalafatis V, Harris T, Wilson J, Stewart AG (1999) Glucocorticoids inhibit proliferation, cyclin D1 expression and retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation, but not mitogen-activated protein kinase activity in human cultured airway smooth muscle. Am J Resp Cell Mol Biol 21:77–88

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Halayko AJ, Solway J (2001) Molecular mechanisms of phenotypic plasticity in smooth muscle cells. J Appl Physiol 90:358–368

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harris PJ, Chatton J-Y, Tran PH, Bungay PM, Spring KR (1994) pH, morphology, and diffusion in lateral intercellular spaces of epithelial cell monolayers. Am J Physiol 266:C73–C80

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoffman R, Gross L (1975) The modulation contrast microscope. Nature 254:586–588

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lepore DA, Hurley JV, Stewart AG, Morrison WA, Anderson RL (2000) Prior heat stress improves the survival of ischemic-reperfused skeletal muscle in vivo: role of HSP 70. Muscle Nerve 23:1847–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McMahon PJ, Barone-Nugent ED, Allman BE, Nugent KA (2002) Quantitative phase amplitude microscopy II. Differential interference contrast imaging for biological TEM. J Microsc 206:204–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mitchell RW, Halayko AJ, Kahraman S, Solway J, Wylam ME (2000) Selective restoration of calcium coupling to muscarinic M3 receptors in contractile cultured airway myocytes. Am J Physiol 278:L1091–L1100

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nomarski G, Weill AR (1955) Application a la metallographie des methods interferentielles a deux ondes polarises. Rev Metall 2:121–128

    Google Scholar 

  16. Paganin D, Barty A, McMahon PJ, Nugent KA (2003) Quantitative phase amplitude microscopy III. The effects of noise. J Microsc (In Press)

  17. Ravenhall CR, Guida E, Harris T, Koutsoubos V, Vadiceloo P, Stewart AG (2000) The importance of ERK activity in the regulation of cyclin D1 levels in DNA synthesis in human cultured airway smooth muscle. Br J Pharmacol 131:17–28

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Roberts A, Ampem-Lassen E, Barty A, Nugent KA, Baxter GW, Dragomir NM, Huntington ST (2002) Refractive-index profiling of optical fibres with axial symmetry by use of quantitative phase microscopy. Opt Lett 27:2061–2063

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Satoh H, Delbridge LMD, Blatter LA, Bers DM (1996) Surface:volume relationship in cardiac myocytes studied with confocal microscopy and membrane capacitance measurements: species-dependence and developmental effects. Biophys J 70:1494–1504

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stewart AG (2001) Airway wall remodelling and hyper-responsiveness: modelling remodelling in vitro and in vivo. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 14:255–265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zernike F (1942) Phase contrast, a new method for the microscopic observation of transparent objects. Physica 9:686–693

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Professor Keith Nugent and Associate Professor Ann Roberts for valuable advice in relation to image generation and analysis throughout the investigations undertaken, and are grateful to Mr. David Stewart of Zeiss Australia for assistance with optical and software components. Funding support from the Australian Research Council (Strategic Partnerships in Industry—Research and Training Scheme), Iatia Ltd. and GlaxoSmithKline (UK) is acknowledged. The QPM system utilized for these investigations is marketed by Iatia Ltd (“QPm”), http://www.iatia.com.au.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lea M. D. Delbridge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Curl, C.L., Harris, T., Harris, P.J. et al. Quantitative phase microscopy: a new tool for measurement of cell culture growth and confluency in situ. Pflugers Arch - Eur J Physiol 448, 462–468 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-004-1248-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-004-1248-7

Keywords

Navigation