Abstract
The receptor for the insect molting hormone, ecdysone, is a heterodimer consisting of the Ecdysone Receptor and Ultraspiracle (USP) proteins. The ligand binding domain sequences of arthropod USPs divide into two distinct groups. One group consists of sequences from members of the holometabolous Lepidoptera and Diptera, while the other arthropod sequences group with vertebrate retinoid-X-receptors (RXRs). We therefore wondered whether USP/RXR structure could be used to clarify the contentious phylogenetic position of the order Strepsiptera, which has proposed affinities with either Diptera or Coleoptera. We have cloned and sequenced the USP/RXR from the strepsipteran Xenos pecki. Phylogenetic analyses are not consistent with a close affinity between Strepsiptera and Diptera.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Billas IM, Moulinier L, Rochel N, Moras D (2001) Crystal structure of the ligand-binding domain of the ultraspiracle protein USP, the ortholog of retinoid X receptors in insects. J Biol Chem 276:7465–7474
Bonneton F, Zelus D, Iwema T, Robinson-Rechavi M, Laudet V (2003) Rapid divergence of the ecdysone receptor in Diptera and Lepidoptera suggests coevolution between ECR and USP-RXR. Mol Biol Evol 20:541–553
Carmean D, Crespi BJ (1995) Do long branches attract flies?. Nature 373:666
Chalwatzis N, Baur A, Stetzer E, Kinzelbach R, Zimmermann FK (1995) Strongly expanded 18S rRNA genes correlated with a peculiar morphology in the insect order of Strepsiptera. Zoology 98:115–126
Chalwatzis N, Hauf J, van de Peer Y, Kinzelbach R, Zimmermann FK (1996) 18S ribosomal RNA genes of insects: primary structure of the genes and molecular phylogeny of the Holometabola. Ann Entomol Soc Am 89:788–903
Chomczynski P, Sacchi N (1987) Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162:156–159
Clayton GM, Peak-Chew SY, Evans RM, Schwabe JW (2001) The structure of the ultraspiracle ligand-binding domain reveals a nuclear receptor locked in an inactive conformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:1549–1554
Crowson RA (1960) The phylogeny of Coleoptera. Ann Rev Entomol 5:111–134
Crowson RA (1981) The biology of the Coleoptera. Academic Press, London, 802 pp
Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791
Hayward DC, Bastiani MJ, Trueman JWH, Truman JW, Riddiford LM, Ball EE (1999) The sequence of Locusta RXR, homologous to Drosophila Ultraspiracle, and its evolutionary implications. Dev Genes Evol 209:564–571
Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755
Hwang UW, Kim W, Tautz D, Friedrich M (1998) Molecular phylogenetics at the Felsenstein Zone: approaching the Strepsiptera problem using 5.8S and 28S rDNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 9:470–480
Kathirithamby J (1989) Review of the order Strepsiptera. Syst Entomol 14:41–92
Kristensen NP (1991) Phylogeny of extant hexapods. In: Naumann ID, Carne PB, Lawrence JF, Nielsen ES, Spradberry JP, Taylor RW, Whitten MJ, Littlejohn MJ (eds) Insects of Australia: a textbook for students and research workers, 2nd edn. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, pp 125–140
Kristensen NP (1999) Phylogeny of endopterygote insects, the most successful lineage of living organisms. Eur J Entomol 96:237–253
Kukalova-Peck J (1991) Fossil history and the evolution of hexapod structures. In: Naumann ID, Carne PB, Lawrence JF, Nielsen ES, Spradberry JP, Taylor RW, Whitten MJ, Littlejohn MJ (eds) Insects of Australia: a textbook for students and research workers, 2nd edn. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, pp 141–179
Kukalova-Peck J, Lawrence JF (1993) Evolution of the hind wing in Coleoptera. Can Entomol 125:181–258
Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818
Rokas A, Kathirithamby J, Holland PWH (1999) Intron insertion as a phylogenetic character: the engrailed homeobox of Strepsiptera does not indicate affinity with Diptera. Insect Mol Biol 8:527–530
Rossi P (1793) Observations sur un nouveau genre d’insecte voisin des Ichneumons. Bull Soc Philomathique 1:49
Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning, a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York
Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.
Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680
Whiting MF (1998) Phylogenetic position of the Strepsiptera: review of molecular and morphological evidence. Int J Insect Morphol Embryol 27:53–60
Whiting MF (2002) Phylogeny of the holometabolous insect orders: molecular evidence. Zool Scripta 31:3–15
Whiting MF, Wheeler WC (1994) Insect homeotic transformation. Nature 368:696
Whiting MF, Carpenter JA, Wheeler QD, Wheeler WC (1997) The Strepsiptera problem: phylogeny of the holometabolous insect orders inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal DNA sequences and morphology. Syst Biol 46:1–68
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Michael Whiting for supplying the Polistes and Xenos material and for his comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Edited by D. Tautz
Electronic Supplementary Material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hayward, D.C., Trueman, J.W.H., Bastiani, M.J. et al. The structure of the USP/RXR of Xenos pecki indicates that Strepsiptera are not closely related to Diptera. Dev Genes Evol 215, 213–219 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-004-0461-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-004-0461-x