Skip to main content
Log in

Structurally related Arabidopsis ANGUSTIFOLIA is functionally distinct from the transcriptional corepressor CtBP

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Development Genes and Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

ANGUSTIFOLIA (AN) controls leaf morphology in the plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Previous studies on sequence similarity demonstrated that the closest proteins to AN are members of animal C-terminal-binding proteins (CtBPs) found in nematodes, arthropods, and vertebrates. Drosophila CtBP (dCtBP) functions as a transcriptional corepressor for deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-binding repressors containing the short amino acid motif, PXDLS, to regulate tissue specification and segmentation during early embryogenesis. It has previously been shown that AN was thought to repress transcription similar to the function of CtBPs; however, AN lacks some of the structural features that are conserved in animal CtBPs. In this paper, we examined whether AN is functionally related to dCtBP. Firstly, we re-examined sequence similarity among AN and various CtBPs from several representative species in the plant and animal kingdoms. Secondly, yeast two-hybrid assays demonstrated that AN failed to interact with an authentic CtBP-interacting factor, adenovirus E1A oncoprotein bearing the PXDLS motif. Thirdly, AN tethered to DNA was unable to repress the expression of reporter genes in transgenic Drosophila embryos. Fourthly, overexpression assays suggested that dCtBP and AN function differently in Drosophila tissues. Finally, AN failed to rescue the zygotic lethality caused by dCtBP loss-of-function. These data, taken together, suggest that AN is functionally distinct from dCtBP. Likely, ancestral CtBPs acquired corepressor function (capability of both repression and binding to repressors containing the PXDLS motif) after the animal–plant divergence but before the protostome–deuterostome split. We therefore propose to categorize AN as a subfamily member within the CtBP/BARS/RIBEYE/AN superfamily.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achouri Y, Noel G, Van Schaftingen E (2007) 2-Keto-4-methylthiobutyrate, an intermediate in the methionine salvage pathway, is a good substrate for CtBP1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 352:903–906

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian P, Zhao LJ, Chinnadurai G (2003) Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide stimulates oligomerization, interaction with adenovirus E1A and an intrinsic dehydrogenase activity of CtBP. FEBS Lett 537:157–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barolo S, Stone T, Bang AG, Posakony JW (2002) Default repression and Notch signaling: Hairless acts as an adaptor to recruit the corepressors Groucho and dCtBP to suppressor of hairless. Genes Dev 16:1964–1976

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brand AH, Perrimon N (1993) Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118:401–415

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brannon M, Brown JD, Bates R, Kimelman D, Moon RT (1999) XCtBP is a XTcf-3 co-repressor with roles throughout Xenopus development. Development 126:3159–3170

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chinnadurai G (2002) CtBP, an unconventional transcriptional corepressor in development and oncogenesis. Mol Cell 9:213–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chinnadurai G (2007) Transcriptional regulation by C-terminal binding proteins. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 39:1593–1607

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cho KH, Shindo T, Kim GT, Nitasaka E, Tsukaya H (2005) Characterization of a member of the AN subfamily, IAN, from Ipomoea nil. Plant Cell Physiol 46:250–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang M, Li J, Blauwkamp T, Bhambhani C, Campbell N, Cadigan KM (2006) C-terminal-binding protein directly activates and represses Wnt transcriptional targets in Drosophila. Embo J 25:2735–2745

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Folkers U, Kirik V, Schobinger U, Falk S, Krishnakumar S, Pollock MA, Oppenheimer DG, Day I, Reddy AS, Jurgens G, Hulskamp M (2002) The cell morphogenesis gene ANGUSTIFOLIA encodes a CtBP/BARS-like protein and is involved in the control of the microtubule cytoskeleton. Embo J 21:1280–1288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallop JL, Butler PJ, McMahon HT (2005) Endophilin and CtBP/BARS are not acyl transferases in endocytosis or Golgi fission. Nature 438:675–678

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gray S, Levine M (1996) Transcriptional repression in development. Curr Opin Cell Biol 8:358–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grooteclaes M, Deveraux Q, Hildebrand J, Zhang Q, Goodman RH, Frisch SM (2003) C-terminal-binding protein corepresses epithelial and proapoptotic gene expression programs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:4568–4573

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heck MM, Pereira A, Pesavento P, Yannoni Y, Spradling AC, Goldstein LS (1993) The kinesin-like protein KLP61F is essential for mitosis in Drosophila. J Cell Biol 123:665–679

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ip YT, Hemavathy K (1997) Drosophila development. Delimiting patterns by repression. Curr Biol 7:R216–R218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kagey MH, Melhuish TA, Wotton D (2003) The polycomb protein Pc2 is a SUMO E3. Cell 113:127–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katsanis N, Fisher EM (1998) A novel C-terminal binding protein (CTBP2) is closely related to CTBP1, an adenovirus E1A-binding protein, and maps to human chromosome 21q21.3. Genomics 47:294–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keller SA, Mao Y, Struffi P, Margulies C, Yurk CE, Anderson AR, Amey RL, Moore S, Ebels JM, Foley K, Corado M, Arnosti DN (2000) dCtBP-dependent and -independent repression activities of the Drosophila Knirps protein. Mol Cell Biol 20:7247–7258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim GT, Shoda K, Tsuge T, Cho KH, Uchimiya H, Yokoyama R, Nishitani K, Tsukaya H (2002) The ANGUSTIFOLIA gene of Arabidopsis, a plant CtBP gene, regulates leaf-cell expansion, the arrangement of cortical microtubules in leaf cells and expression of a gene involved in cell-wall formation. Embo J 21:1267–1279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V, Carlson JE, Ohgi KA, Edwards TA, Rose DW, Escalante CR, Rosenfeld MG, Aggarwal AK (2002) Transcription corepressor CtBP is an NAD(+)-regulated dehydrogenase. Mol Cell 10:857–869

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HS, Simon JA, Lis JT (1988) Structure and expression of ubiquitin genes of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol Cell Biol 8:4727–4735

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liew CK, Crossley M, Mackay JP, Nicholas HR (2007) Solution structure of the THAP domain from Caenorhabditis elegans C-terminal binding protein (CtBP). J Mol Biol 366:382–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin X, Sun B, Liang M, Liang YY, Gast A, Hildebrand J, Brunicardi FC, Melchior F, Feng XH (2003) Opposed regulation of corepressor CtBP by SUMOylation and PDZ binding. Mol Cell 11:1389–1396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mani-Telang P, Arnosti DN (2007) Developmental expression and phylogenetic conservation of alternatively spliced forms of the C-terminal binding protein corepressor. Dev Genes Evol 217:127–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mannervik M, Nibu Y, Zhang H, Levine M (1999) Transcriptional coregulators in development. Science 284:606–609

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muraoka O, Ichikawa H, Shi H, Okumura S, Taira E, Higuchi H, Hirano T, Hibi M, Miki N (2000) Kheper, a novel ZFH/deltaEF1 family member, regulates the development of the neuroectoderm of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Dev Biol 228:29–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nardini M, Spano S, Cericola C, Pesce A, Massaro A, Millo E, Luini A, Corda D, Bolognesi M (2003) CtBP/BARS: a dual-function protein involved in transcription co-repression and Golgi membrane fission. Embo J 22:3122–3130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nibu Y, Levine MS (2001) CtBP-dependent activities of the short-range Giant repressor in the Drosophila embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6204–6208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nibu Y, Zhang H, Bajor E, Barolo S, Small S, Levine M (1998a) dCtBP mediates transcriptional repression by Knirps, Kruppel and Snail in the Drosophila embryo. Embo J 17:7009–7020

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nibu Y, Zhang H, Levine M (1998b) Interaction of short-range repressors with Drosophila CtBP in the embryo. Science 280:101–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nibu Y, Zhang H, Levine M (2001) Local action of long-range repressors in the Drosophila embryo. Embo J 20:2246–2253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nibu Y, Senger K, Levine M (2003) CtBP-independent repression in the Drosophila embryo. Mol Cell Biol 23:3990–3999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phippen TM, Sweigart AL, Moniwa M, Krumm A, Davie JR, Parkhurst SM (2000) Drosophila C-terminal binding protein functions as a context-dependent transcriptional co-factor and interferes with both mad and groucho transcriptional repression. J Biol Chem 275:37628–37637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga G, Watanabe M, Parkhurst SM (1998) Drosophila CtBP: a hairy-interacting protein required for embryonic segmentation and hairy-mediated transcriptional repression. Embo J 17:2067–2078

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan KG, Nardini M, Verger A, Francescato P, Yaswen P, Corda D, Bolognesi M, Crossley M (2006a) Specific recognition of ZNF217 and other zinc finger proteins at a surface groove of C-terminal binding proteins. Mol Cell Biol 26:8159–8172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan KG, Verger A, Kwok A, Lee SH, Perdomo J, Nardini M, Bolognesi M, Crossley M (2006b) Role of the C-terminal binding protein PXDLS motif binding cleft in protein interactions and transcriptional repression. Mol Cell Biol 26:8202–8213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rintala E, Pitkanen JP, Vehkomaki ML, Penttila M, Ruohonen L (2007) The ORF YNL274c (GOR1) codes for glyoxylate reductase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 24:129–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryu JR, Arnosti DN (2003) Functional similarity of Knirps CtBP-dependent and CtBP-independent transcriptional repressor activities. Nucleic Acids Res 31:4654–4662

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz F, Konigstorfer A, Sudhof TC (2000) RIBEYE, a component of synaptic ribbons: a protein’s journey through evolution provides insight into synaptic ribbon function. Neuron 28:857–872

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y, Sawada J, Sui G, Affar el B, Whetstine JR, Lan F, Ogawa H, Luke MP, Nakatani Y, Shi Y (2003) Coordinated histone modifications mediated by a CtBP co-repressor complex. Nature 422:735–738

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sutrias-Grau M, Arnosti DN (2004) CtBP contributes quantitatively to Knirps repression activity in an NAD binding-dependent manner. Mol Cell Biol 24:5953–5966

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thio SS, Bonventre JV, Hsu SI (2004) The CtBP2 co-repressor is regulated by NADH-dependent dimerization and possesses a novel N-terminal repression domain. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1836–1847

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsukaya H (2006) A new member of the CtBP/BARS family from plants: Angustifolia. Landes Bioscience, Georgetown, TX

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner J, Crossley M (1998) Cloning and characterization of mCtBP2, a co-repressor that associates with basic Kruppel-like factor and other mammalian transcriptional regulators. Embo J 17:5129–5140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verger A, Quinlan KG, Crofts LA, Spano S, Corda D, Kable EP, Braet F, Crossley M (2006) Mechanisms directing the nuclear localization of the CtBP family proteins. Mol Cell Biol 26:4882–4894

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wan L, Almers W, Chen W (2005) Two ribeye genes in teleosts: the role of Ribeye in ribbon formation and bipolar cell development. J Neurosci 25:941–949

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weigert R, Silletta MG, Spano S, Turacchio G, Cericola C, Colanzi A, Senatore S, Mancini R, Polishchuk EV, Salmona M, Facchiano F, Burger KN, Mironov A, Luini A, Corda D (1999) CtBP/BARS induces fission of Golgi membranes by acylating lysophosphatidic acid. Nature 402:429–433

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao LJ, Subramanian T, Zhou Y, Chinnadurai G (2006) Acetylation by p300 regulates nuclear localization and function of the transcriptional corepressor CtBP2. J Biol Chem 281:4183–4189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Anna Di Gregorio and Monn M. Myat for critical reading of the manuscript and Susan Lee for technical help. We also thank Eric Lai, Makoto Sato, Richard H. Goodman, Wilhelm Grussem, M. Sekine, and the Bloomington stock center for providing fly strains and plasmids. H.A. is supported by postdoctoral fellowships from the Uehara Memorial Foundation and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). This work was supported by grants from the Charles A. Frueauff Foundation and from the Speaker’s Fund for Biomedical Research awarded by the City of New York to Y.N. and by a Grant-in-Aid from JSPS and grants from the Toray Science Foundation and the Sumitomo Foundation to H.T.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yutaka Nibu.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Desplan

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Fig. S1

Amino acid alignment of Ce-CtBP-S and Ce-CtBP-L. Amino acid sequences of Ce-CtBP-L (accession number NP_508983) and Ce-CtBP-S (accession number T34290) were compared (GIF 72.6 KB)

High-resolution image file (TIFF 27.8 MB)

Fig. S2

Amino acid alignment of Sp-CtBP-S and Sp-CtBP-L. Amino acid sequences of Se-CtBP-L (accession number XP_001176951) and Sp-CtBP-S (accession number XP_780717) were compared. Sp-CtBP-S seems to be a truncation of the THAP domain, as this shorter isoform starts from a methionine residue located at position 105 aa in reference to Sp-CtBP-L (GIF 50.7 KB)

High-resolution image file (TIFF 20.4 MB)

Fig. S3

Comparison of N-terminal regions between Ce-CtBP-L and Sp-CtBP-L. The N terminus of Ce-CtBP-L contains the THAP domain (1–89 aa), which may bind to DNA. This domain is well conserved in the N terminus of Sp-CtBP-L (GIF 10.8 KB)

High-resolution image file (TIFF 6.74 MB)

Fig. S4

dCtBP binds to the PXDLS motifs. GST pull-down assays as well as mutations of the PXDLS motifs of Knirps and Snail by alanine substitution were previously described (Nibu et al. 1998a,b). A full-length wild-type Knirps protein labeled with 35S-methionine was incubated with the GST-dCtBP 383aa fusion protein or with GST alone. Bound complexes were loaded onto a polyacrylamide gel. For comparison, 10% of the total amount of 35S-labeled Knirps used in the binding reaction (lane 10% input). Knirps does not bind GST (lane GST on the left side of the panel indicated as wild-type) but interacts with GST-dCtBP (lane GST/dCtBP 383). Four alanine substitutions in the PXDLS motif (conversion from PMDLS to AAAAS) of Knirps in the full-length context diminish binding to GST-dCtBP, consistent with previous results obtained with a truncated form of Knirps (Keller et al. 2000; Nibu et al. 1998b). The 35S-labeled full-length wild-type Snail proteins interact with GST-dCtBP but not with GST (left side of the panel indicated as wild-type). A mutant form of Snail lacking both its PXDLS motifs (in which the normal motif, PQDLS and PEDLS, were converted to AQAAA and AEAAA, respectively; AQAAA AEAAA) interacts with GST-dCtBP more weakly than a form of Snail mutated mutations only in the second motif (Nibu et al. 1998b) (GIF 26.4 KB)

High-resolution image file (TIFF 5.66 MB)

Fig. S5

AN fails to interact with the retinoblastoma (Rb) tumor suppressor in yeast two-hybrid assays. A DB-Rb plasmid (the GAL4-DNA-binding domain fused to Rb in pAS2-1) and an AD-D3 plasmid (Cyclin D3 fused to the GAL4-activation-domain in pACT2) were kindly provided by Drs. W. Grussem and M. Sekine, respectively. The method described in Fig. 2 was employed. Yeast colonies carrying both AD-AN and BD-Rb plasmids did not grow in the selective medium (SD-Trp-Leu-His, containing 25 mM 3-AT), indicating that AN fails to interact with Rb (right panel). As a positive control, Rb was shown to interact with Cyclin D3 (right panel) (GIF 29.2 KB)

High-resolution image file (TIFF 5.09 MB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stern, M.D., Aihara, H., Cho, KH. et al. Structurally related Arabidopsis ANGUSTIFOLIA is functionally distinct from the transcriptional corepressor CtBP. Dev Genes Evol 217, 759–769 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-007-0186-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00427-007-0186-8

Keywords

Navigation