Abstract
Background: Two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been reported to be safe and feasible. However, whether it offers any additional advantages remains controversial. This study reports a randomized trial that compared the clinical outcomes of two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: One hundred and twenty consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized to receive either the two-port or the four-port technique. All patients were blinded to the type of operation they underwent. Four surgical tapes were applied to standard four-port sites in both groups at the end of the operation. All dressings were kept intact until the first follow-up 1 week after surgery. Postoperative pain at the four sites was assessed on the first day after surgery using a 10-cm unscaled visual analog scale (VAS). Other outcome measures included analgesia requirements, length and difficulty of the operation, postoperative stay, and patient satisfaction score on surgery and scars. Results: Demographic data were comparable for both groups. Patients in the two-port group had shorter mean operative time (54.6 ± 24.7 min vs 66.9 ± 33.1 min for the four-post group; p = 0.03) and less pain at individual subcostal port sites [mean score using 10-cm unscaled VAS: 1.5 vs 2.8 (p = 0.01) at the midsubcostal port site and 1.3 vs 2.3 (p = 0.02) at the lateral subcostal port site]. Overall pain score, analgesia requirements, hospital stay, and patient satisfaction score on surgery and scars were similar between the two groups. Conclusion: Two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy resulted in less individual port-site pain and similar clinical outcomes but fewer surgical scars compared to four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Thus, it can be recommended as a routine procedure in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
T Bisgaard B Klarskov R Trap H Kehlet J Rosenberg (2000) ArticleTitlePain after microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy. A randomized double blind controlled study. Surg Endosc 14 340–344
WK Cheah JE Lenzi JB So CK Kum PM Goh (2001) ArticleTitleRandomized trial of needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 88 45–47 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01636.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7isFGnsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11136308
A Cuschieri S Shimi S Banting LK Nathanson A Pietrabissa (1994) ArticleTitleIntraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Routine vs selective policy. Surg Endosc 8 302–305
PL Leggett R Churchman-Winn R Miller (2000) ArticleTitleMinimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 14 32–36
KF Leung KW Lee TY Cheung LC Leung KW Lau (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy: two-port technique. Endoscopy 6 505–507
D Lomanto L De Angelis V Ceci G Dalsasso J So FM Frattaroli R Muthiah V Speranza (2001) ArticleTitleTwo-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a reproducible technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11 248–251 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mvot1CisQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11525369
CM Poon KW Chan CW Ko KC Chan DW Lee HY Cheung KW Lee (2002) ArticleTitleTwo-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial results of a modified technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12 259–262 Occurrence Handle10.1089/109264202760268032 Occurrence Handle12269493
CS Ramachandran V Arora (1998) ArticleTitleTwo-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an innovative new method for gallbladder removal. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 8 303–308 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2Fjs1Kjuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9820723
NJ Soper DL Dunnegan (1992) ArticleTitleRoutine versus selective intra-operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 16 1133–1140 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyD1cfot1E%3D Occurrence Handle1455885
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Poon, C., Chan, K., Lee, D. et al. Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy . Surg Endosc 17, 1624–1627 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8718-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8718-9