Skip to main content
Log in

Early conversion for gangrenous cholecystitis: impact on outcome

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Early conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy for patients with gangrenous cholecystitis has been advocated. This study investigated the impact of early conversion on patient outcome.

Methods

Data from all patients with gangrenous cholecystitis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy between 1992 and 2002 whose procedure had been converted to open surgery were prospectively collected and analyzed. Morbidity, length of stay, intensive care unit admission, and operative time served as outcome measures.

Results

Of the 97 patients in the study, 33 underwent conversion to open cholecystectomy. The conversion was early for 24% of the patients, after the initial dissection, for 33% and after an extended attempt at completion of the laparoscopic cholecystectomy for 37%. There was no difference in the overall morbidity among the groups, whereas the length of hospital stay appeared to be longer in the early conversion group. The operative time was significantly shorter after early conversion (p < 0.01, chi-square test).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not feasible for all patients with gangrenous cholecystitis. However, a concerted effort to perform the cholecystectomy with the minimally invasive approach does not have an adverse impact on patient outcome and is likely to benefit patients although it poses a moderate risk of conversion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. JS Bender MD Duncan PD Freeswick JW Harmon TH Magnuson (2002) ArticleTitleIncreased laparoscopic experience does not lead to improved results with acute cholecystitis Am J Surg 184 591–595 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(02)01089-9 Occurrence Handle12488180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. LM Brunt MA Quasebarth DL Dunnegan NJ Soper (2001) ArticleTitleOutcomes analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the extremely elderly Surg. Endosc 15 700–705 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640000388 Occurrence Handle11591971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. MR Cox TG Wilson AJ Luck PL Jeans RTA Padbury J Toouli (1993) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder Ann Surg 218 630–634 Occurrence Handle8239777

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. S Eldar E Sabo E Nash J Abrahamson I Matter (1997) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: prospective trial World J Surg. 21 540–545 Occurrence Handle9204745

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. S Eldar E Sabo E Nash J Abrahamson I Matter (1998) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy for the various types of gallbladder inflammation: prospective trial Surg Laparosc Endosc 8 200–207 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00019509-199806000-00008 Occurrence Handle9649044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. N Estes C McElhinney M Estes H Opie M Johnson (1996) ArticleTitleAcute cholecystitis treated urgently by nonselective laparoscopic cholecystectomy Am Surg 62 598–602 Occurrence Handle8651559

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. FA Habib RB Kolachalam R Khilnani O Preventza VK Mittal (2001) ArticleTitleRole of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of gangrenous cholecystitis Am J Surg 181 71–75 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00525-0 Occurrence Handle11248180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. DRH Hunt FCK Chu (2000) ArticleTitleGangrenous cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era Aust N Z J Surg 70 428–430 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01851.x Occurrence Handle10843398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. T Kiviluoto J Sirén P Luukkonen E Kivlaakso (1998) ArticleTitleRandomized trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis Lancet 351 321–325 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08447-X Occurrence Handle9652612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. JA Lujan P Parrilla R Robles JA Torralba J Garcia Ayllon R Liron F Sanchez-Bueno (1995) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis J Am Coll Surg 181 75–77 Occurrence Handle7599776

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. LT Merriam SA Kanaan LG Dawes P Angelos JB Prystowsky RV Rege RJ Joehl (1999) ArticleTitleGangrenous cholecystitis: analysis of risk factors and experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy Surgery 126 680–686 Occurrence Handle10.1067/msy.2099.99881 Occurrence Handle10520915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. JA Singer RV McKeen (1994) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute or gangrenous cholecystitis Am Surg 60 326–328 Occurrence Handle8161080

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stefanidis D, Bingener J, Richards ML, Schwesinger WH, Dorman JP, Sirinek KR (2005) Gangrenous cholecystitis in the decade before and after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In press JSLSl

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Bingener.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bingener, J., Stefanidis, D., Richards, M.L. et al. Early conversion for gangrenous cholecystitis: impact on outcome. Surg Endosc 19, 1139–1141 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8190-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8190-9

Keywords

Navigation