Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Breast duct microendoscopy in nipple discharge: microbrush improves cytology

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Breast duct microendoscopy is a new technique that allows direct visualization of the mammary ductal epithelia and has the potential to provide greater accuracy in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast conditions. We have already established the feasibility of BDME on mastectomy specimens and in patients both under general and local anesthesia. It was the aim of this study to investigate the use of BDME in patients with pathological nipple discharge and to explore the feasibility of using an endoluminal microbrush to take cytology samples from specific lesions.

Materials and methods

Breast duct microendoscopy was offered to all patients undergoing surgery for nipple discharge. Surgery included microdochectomy (younger women) and total duct excision (especially in postmenopausal women). The microbrush was used to collect samples whenever an endoluminal papilloma was seen on endoscopy. The results of microbrush cytology samples were compared to ductal lavage samples.

Results

Fifty consecutive patients undergoing microdochectomy or total duct excision for nipple discharge had breast microendoscopy (28 general, and 22 under local anesthesia). Thirty-one patients had microdochectomy and nineteen had total duct excision. Visualiza- tion of discharging ducts was accomplished in 100% cases. Endoluminal abnormalities were seen in 33 (66%) patients and dilated ducts were seen in 17 patients. Among the 33 patients, 15 had single papilloma, 3 multiple papilloma and 15 inflammation (erythema, fronds, adhesions). Seven out of eight patients with an intraductal papillorna who had microbrush cytology showed papillary cells whereas only 2 out of 11 patients who had ductal lavage were positive for papillary cells. Thus the sensitivity of the brush cytology technique for the diagnosis of papilloma was 87.5% and the sensitivity of ductal lavage 18% (p = 0.0055).

Conclusion

Breast duct microendoscopy is an effective way of establishing the etiology of nipple discharge. The microbrush increases the sensitivity of cytology significantly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baitchev G, Gortchev G, Todorova A, Dikov D, Stancheva N, Daskalova I (2003) Intraductal aspiration cytology and galactography for nipple discharge. Int Surg 88: 83–86

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dietz JR, Crowe JP, Grundfest S, Arrigain S, Kim JA (2002) Directed duct excision by using mammary ductoscopy in patients with pathologic nipple discharge. Surgery 132: 582–597, discussion pp 587–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dinkel HP, Gassel AM, Muller T, Lourens S, Rominger M, Tschammler A (2001) Galactography and exfoliative cytology in women with abnormal nipple discharge. Obstet Gynecol 97: 625–629

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dunn JM, Lucarotti ME, Wood SJ, Mumford A, Webb AJ (1995) Exfoliative cytology in the diagnosis of breast disease. Br J Surg 82: 789–791

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Florio MA, Fama F, Giacobbe G, Pollicino A, Scarfo P (2003) Nipple discharge: personal experience with 2,818 cases. Chir Ital 55: 357–364

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hou M, Tsai K, Lin H, Chai C, Liu C, Huang T (2000) A simple intraductal aspiration method for cytodiagnosis in nipple discharge. Acta Cytol 44: 1029–1034

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kothari A, D’Arrigo C, Beechey-Newman N (2002) Mammary duct microendoscopy: a study into the feasibility and technique [abstract]. Eur J Cancer 38: 137

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee WY (2003) Cytology of abnormal nipple discharge: a cytohistological correlation. Cytopathology 14: 19–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Makita M, Sakamoto G, Akiyama F, Namba K, Sugano H, Kasumi F, Nishi M, Ikenaga M (1991) Duct endoscopy and endoscopic biopsy in the evaluation of nipple discharge. Breast Cancer Res Treat 18: 179–187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Okazaki A, Hirata K, Okazaki M, Svane G, Azavedo E (1999) Nipple discharge disorders: current diagnostic management and the role of fiberductoscopy. Eur Radiol 9: 583–590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Okazaki A, Okazaki M, Asaishi K, Satoh H, Watanabe Y, Mikami T, Toda K, Okazaki Y, Nabeta K, Hirata K, et al (1991) Fiberoptic ductoscopy of the breast: a new diagnostic procedure for nipple discharge. Jpn J Clin Oncol 21: 188–193

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shen KW, Wu J, Lu JS, Han QX, Shen ZZ, Nguyen M, Barsky SH, Shao ZM (2001) Fiberoptic ductoscopy for breast cancer patients with nipple discharge. Surg Endosc 15: 1340–1345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shen KW, Wu J, Lu JS, Han QX, Shen ZZ, Nguyen M, Shao ZM, Barsky SH (2000) Fiberoptic ductoscopy for patients with nipple discharge. Cancer 89: 1512–1519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Simmons R, Adamovich T, Brennan M, Christos P, Schultz M, Eisen C, Osborne M (2003) Nonsurgical evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol 10: 113–116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamamoto D, Shoji T, Kawanishi H, Nakagawa H, Haijima H, Gondo H, Tanaka K (2001) A utility of ductography and fiberoptic ductoscopy for patients with nipple discharge. Breast Cancer Res Treat 70: 103–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beechey-Newman, N., Kulkarni, D., Kothari, A. et al. Breast duct microendoscopy in nipple discharge: microbrush improves cytology. Surg Endosc 19, 1648–1651 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0124-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0124-7

Keywords

Navigation