Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

A survey of 2,130 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Routine use of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a matter of debate.

Methods

Data from 2,130 consecutive LCs and patients’ follow-up during 9 years were collected and analyzed. During the first 4 years of the study, 800 patients underwent LC, and IOC was performed selectively (SIOC). Thereafter, 1,330 patients underwent LC, and IOC was routinely attempted (RIOC) for all.

Results

In the IOC group, 159 patients met the criteria for SIOC, which was completed successfully in 141 cases (success rate, 88.6%). Bile duct calculi were found in nine patients. All other patients with no criteria or failed SIOC were followed, and in nine patients retained stones were documented. Thus, the incidence of ductal stones was 1.1% and sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) for the detection of ductal stones were 50, 100, 98.6, and 100%, respectively. In the RIOC group, IOC was routinely attempted in 1,330 patients and was successful in 1,133 (success rate, 90.9%; p = 0.015). Bile duct stones were detected in 37 patients (including 14 asymptomatic stones). In two cases, IOC failed to reveal ductal stones (false negative). There was no false-positive IOC. Therefore, with RIOC policy, the incidence of ductal stones, sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV were 3.3, 97.4, 100, 99.8, and 100%, respectively (significantly higher for success rate, incidence, sensitivity, and NPV; p < 0.05). Abnormal IOC findings were also significantly higher in the RIOC group. Common bile duct injury occurred only in the SIOC group [two cases of all 2,130 LCs (0.09%)].

Conclusion

RIOC during LC is a safe, accurate, quick, and cost-effective method for the detection of bile duct anatomy and stones. A highly disciplined performance of RIOC can minimize potentially debilitating and hazardous complications of bile duct injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mirizzi PL (1955) Calculi of the common bile duct (520 cases under the control of surgical cholangiography). Mem Acad Chir (Paris) 81: 834–841

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Gallstones, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (1993) Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 7: 271–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S, Nathanson LK, Pietrabissa A (1994) Intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Routine vs selective policy. Surg Endosc 8: 302–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shively EH, Wieman TJ, Adams AL, Romines RB, Garrison RN (1990) Operative cholangiography. Am J Surg 159: 380–384

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vezakis A, Davides D, Ammori BJ, Martin IG, Larvin M, McMahon MJ (2000) Intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 14: 1118–1122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones DB, Dunnegan DL, Soper NJ (1995) Results of a change to routine fluorocholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery 118: 693–702

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Woods MS, Traverso LW, Kozarek RA, Donohue JH, Fletcher DR, Hunter JG, Oddsdottir M, Rossi RL, Tsao J, Windsor J (1995) Biliary tract complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy are detected more frequently with routine intraoperative cholangiography. Surg Endosc 9: 1076–1080<AQ22>

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Soper NJ, Dunnegan DL (1992) Routine versus selective intra-operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 16: 1133–1140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hauer-Jensen M, Karesen R, Nygaard K, Solheim K, Amlie EJ, Havig O, Rosseland AR (1993) Prospective randomized study of routine intraoperative cholangiography during open cholecystectomy: long-term follow-up and multivariate analysis of predictors of choledocholithiasis. Surgery 113: 318–323

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kullman E, Borch K, Lindstrom E, Svanvik J, Anderberg B (1996) Value of routine intraoperative cholangiography in detecting aberrant bile ducts and bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 83: 171–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stuart SA, Simpson TI, Alvord LA, Williams MD (1998) Routine intraoperative laparoscopic cholangiography. Am J Surg 176: 632–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Snow LL, Weinstein LS, Hannon JK, Lane DR (2001) Evaluation of operative cholangiography in 2043 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case for the selective operative cholangiogram. Surg Endosc 15: 14–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, Croce E, Lacy A, Toouli J, Faggioni A, Ribeiro VM, Jakimowicz J, Visa J, et al (1999) E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 13: 952–957

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Erickson RA, Carlson B (1995) The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Gastroenterology 109: 252–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ammori BJ, Birbas K, Davides D, Vezakis A, Larvin M, McMahon MJ (2000) Routine vs “on demand” postoperative ERCP for small bile duct calculi detected at intraoperative cholangiography. Clinical evaluation and cost analysis. Surg Endosc 14: 1123–1126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Flowers JL, Zucker KA, Graham SM, Scovill WA, Imbembo AL, Bailey RW (1992) Laparoscopic cholangiography. Results and indications. Ann Surg 215: 209–216

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rhodes M, Sussman L, Cohen L, Lewis MP (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones. Lancet 351: 159–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Robinson BL, Donohue JH, Gunes S, Thompson GB, Grant CS, Sarr MG, Farnell MB, van Heerden JA (1995) Selective operative cholangiography. Appropriate management for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 130: 625–631

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Phillips EH, Berci G, Carroll B, Daykhovsky L, Sackier J, Paz-Partlow M (1990) The importance of intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 56: 792–795

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC (1993) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 165: 9–14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stewart L, Way LW (1995) Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Factors that influence the results of treatment. Arch Surg 130: 1123–1128

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ludwig K, Bernhardt J, Steffen H, Lorenz D (2002) Contribution of intraoperative cholangiography to incidence and outcome of common bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 16: 1098–1104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Olsen D (1997) Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 11: 133–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Clair DG, Carr-Locke DL, Becker JM, Brooks DC (1993) Routine cholangiography is not warranted during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 128: 551–554

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Morgan S, Traverso LW (2000) Intraoperative cholangiography and postoperative pancreatitis. Surg Endosc 14: 264–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Phillips EH (1993) Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography. Am J Surg 165: 505–507

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Flum DR, Flowers C, Veenstra DL (2003) A cost-effectiveness analysis of intraoperative cholangiography in the prevention of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 196: 385–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General and Laparoscopic Surgery, Arad General Hospital, Somayeh Street, between Dr. Shariati and Bahar Avenue, Tehran, 15618, Iran

    A. Nickkholgh, S. Soltaniyekta & H. Kalbasi

Authors
  1. A. Nickkholgh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Soltaniyekta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. Kalbasi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Nickkholgh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nickkholgh, A., Soltaniyekta, S. & Kalbasi, H. Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 20, 868–874 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0425-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0425-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation