Abstract
Background
As innate dexterity is considered one of the important predictors of eventual operative competence, an experimental human factors study was conducted to determine innate dexterity and ambidexterity across handedness and gender.
Methods
50 medical students (right-handed males, left-handed males, and right-handed females) were recruited as participants in a study designed to assess innate dexterity and degree of ambidexterity for endoscopic manipulations in a validated virtual-reality simulator. All participants performed unilateral and bilateral tasks with both dominant and nondominant hands in random sequence. The outcome measures were execution time, extent of ambidexterity (ambidexterity index), aiming errors, and maximum tissue damage.
Results
Right-handed males exhibited a greater level of ambidexterity than left-handed males (p = 0.02 for path length, p = 0.001 for angular path) and right-handed females (p = 0.01 for path length, p = 0.02 for angular path), and more-efficient task performance as measured by execution time (p = 0.001 for males and p = 0.03 across gender). The task quality when executed by the dominant hand was best in right-handed males (p = 0.001 vs. left-dominant males and p = 0.03 across gender). No significant difference was observed in terms of precision control and fine movements (aiming errors and maximum tissue damage) between the three groups.
Conclusions
These findings indicate that training surgical curricula in laparoscopic surgery should be more flexible to accommodate the innate differences across handedness and gender.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amunts K, Schleicher A, Steinmrtz H, Dabringhaus A, Roland PE, Zilles K (1996) Asymmetry in human motor cortex and Handedness. Neuroimage 4:216–222
Bradshaw JL, Nicholls MER Rogers MA (1998) An intermanual advantage for tactual matching. Cortex 34:763–770
Schulze K, Luders E, Jancke L (2002) Intermanual transfer in a simple motor task. Cortex 38:805–815
Gilbert AN, Wysocki CJ (1992) Hand preference and age in United States. Neuropsychologia 30:601–608
Peters M, Durding BM (1978) Handedness measured by finger tapping: A continuous variable. Can J Psychol 32:257–261
Annett M (1996) Laterality and types of dyslexia. Neuroscience and Biobehav Rev 20:631–636
Annett J, Annett M, Hudson PTW, Turner A (1979) The control of movement in preferred and non preferred hands. Q J Exp Psychol 31:641–652
Volkman J, Schnitzler A, Witte OW, Freund H-J (1998) Handedness and asymmetry of hand representation in human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 79:2149–2154
Annett M. (1970) A classification of hand preference by association analysis. Br J Psychol 61:303–321
Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh handedness. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113
Bryden MP (1977) Measuring handedness with questionnaires. Neuropsychologia 15:617–624
Chapman LJ, Chapman JP (1987) The measurement of handedness. Brain Cognition 6:175–183
McKeever WF, Vandeventer AD (1977) Familial sinistrality and degree of left handedness. Br J Psychol 68:469–471
Gabbard C, Hart S, Kanipe D (1993) Hand preference consistency and motor performance in young children. Cortex, 29:749–753
Annett M, Kilshaw D (1983) Right- and Left-handed skills II: estimating the parameter of distribution of L-R differences in males and females. Br J Psychol 74:269–283
Carlier M, Dumont AM, Beau J (1993) Hand performance of French children on a finger-tapping test in relation to handedness, sex, and age. Perceptual Motor Skills 76:931–940
Tapley SM, Bryden MP (1985) A group test for the assessment of performance between the hands. Neuropsychologia 23:215–221
Todor JI, Kyprie P (1980) Hand differences in the rate and variability of rapid tapping. Journal Motor Behav 12:57–62
Schueneman Al, Pickleman J, Freeark RJ (1985) Age, gender, lateral dominance and prediction of operative skills among general surgery residents. Surgery 98:506–515
Schueneman AL, Pickelman J, Hesslein R, Freearck RJ (1984) Neuropsychological predictors of operative skills among general surgical residents. Surgery 96:288–295
Spencer FC (1976) Deductive reasoning in the lifelong continuing education of the cardiovascular surgeon. Arch Surg 111:1177–1183
Squire D, Giachino AA, Profitt AW, Heaney C (1989) Objective comparison of manual dexterity in physicians and surgeons. Can J Surg 32:467–470
Carson RG, Chua R, Goodman D, Byblow WD, Elliot D (1995) The preparation of aiming movements. Brain Cognition 28:133–154
Carson RG, Goodman D, Chua R, Elliott D (1993) Asymmetries in the regulation of visually guided aiming. J Motor Behav 25:21–32
Macmillan AI, Cuschieri A (1999) Assessment of innate ability and skills for endoscopic manipulations by the advanced Dundee endoscopic psychomotor tester: predictive and concurrent validity. Am J Surg 177:274–277
Amunts K, Schleicher A, Steinmrtz H, Dabringhaus A, Roland PE, Zilles K (1996) Asymmetry in human motor cortex and Handedness. Neuroimage 4:216–222
Kertesz A, Polk M, Black SE, Howell J (1990) Sex, handedness, and the morphometry of cerebral asymmetries on magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Res 530:40–48
Kilshaw D, Annett M (1983) Right and left hand skill 1. Effects of age, sex and hand preference showing superior skill in left-handers. Br J Psychol 74:253–268
Hanna GB, Drew T, Clinch P, Shimi S, Dunkley P, Hau C, Cuschieri A (1997) Psychomotor skills for endoscopic manipulation: Differing abilities between right and left-handed individuals. Ann Surg 225(3):333–338
Cuschieri A, Francis N, Crosby J, Hanna GB (2001) What do the master surgeons think of surgical competence and revalidation. Am J Surg 182:110–116
Cuschieri A (2003) Lest we forget the surgeon. Sem Lap Surg 10:141–148
Hyltander A, Liljegren E, Rhodin PH, Lonroth H (2002) The transfer of basic skills learned in a laparoscopic simulator to the operating room. Surg Endosc 16:1324–1328
Andreatta PB, Woodrum DT, Birkmeyer JD, Yellamchilli RK, Doherty GM, Gauger PG, Minter RM (2006) Laparoscopic skills are improved with LapMentor training: results of a randomised, double-blind study. Ann Surg 243:854–860
EAES Work Group for Evaluation, Implementation of Simulators and Skills. Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality simulators update December 2006,http://www.eaes-eur.org/site/c_index.php?control=compubl&id=26&comid=7&task=view Accessed 7/3/07
Cosman PH, Cregan PC, Marten CJ, Cartmill JA (2002) Virtual reality simulators: Current status in acquisition and assessment of surgical skills. ANZ J Surg 72:30–34
Bryden MP, Sprott DA (1981) Statistical determination of degree of laterality. Neuropsychologia 19:571–581
Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J (2003) Impact of hand dominance, gender, and experience with computer games on performance in virtual reality laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 17:1082–1085
Gabbard C, Iteya M, Rabb C (1997) A lateralized comparison of handedness and object proximity. Can J Exp Psychol 51(2):176–180
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elneel, F.H.F., Carter, F., Tang, B. et al. Extent of innate dexterity and ambidexterity across handedness and gender: Implications for training in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 22, 31–37 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9533-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9533-0