Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of ultrasound and dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphy changes in acute pyelonephritis

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Pediatric Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

 The strategy for morphological investigations in children with acute pyelonephritis (APN) remains debatable. We studied 70 children (median age 2.0 years) admitted with a first episode of pyelonephritis using a high-resolution ultrasound technique (RUS) and compared the results with 99m technetium–dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) renal scintigraphy. The DMSA scan was abnormal in 62 children (89%). However, using a high-frequency transducer we found abnormal sonogram changes in 61 children (87%), consisting of an increased kidney volume in 42, and/or a thickening of the wall of the renal pelvis in 42, and/or a focal hyper- or hypoechogenicity in 36, and/or a diffuse hyperechogenicity in 31 children. Micturating cystourethrography was performed in all children, revealing vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in 22 (31%). Among those children with VUR, 4 had a normal DMSA scan, 2 an abnormal RUS, and 2 a normal DMSA scan and RUS. Our data suggest that B-mode RUS performed with a high-frequency transducer by a trained radiologist is nearly as sensitive as the DMSA scan in diagnosing renal involvement in children with unobstructed APN and in predicting VUR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 9 January 1998 / Revised: 11 July 1998 / Accepted: 28 July 1998

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morin, D., Veyrac, C., Kotzki, P. et al. Comparison of ultrasound and dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphy changes in acute pyelonephritis. Pediatr Nephrol 13, 219–222 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004670050596

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004670050596

Navigation