Abstract
Goal of work
To die with dignity is an important but ambiguous concept, and it is used in contradictory contexts, both for the promotion of palliative care and as an argument for euthanasia. Our goal was to explore medical students’ definition of a dignified death.
Patients and methods
A questionnaire containing open-ended questions was answered anonymously by 165 first- and fifth-year medical students. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis with no predetermined categories.
Main results
The students’ descriptions of a dignified death resulted in five categories of death: (1) without suffering, (2) with limited medical interventions, (3) with a sense of security, which implied a safe environment nursed by professional staff, (4) with autonomy, respect for the individual and empowerment to the patient and (5) with acceptance. These findings show similarity to the established concepts of a good death, as well as the view of a dignified death by terminally ill patients.
Conclusions
The data suggest that the students perceive that the medical system is over-treating patients and sometimes causing harm to dying patients. The results reveal a potential misunderstanding and contradiction relating to death without suffering and the use of necessary palliative interventions. These findings are important when planning education as regards palliative care and dignified death.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balaskas J (1989) Active birth. Unwin, London
Billings JA, Block S (1997) Palliative care in undergraduate medical education: status report and future directions. JAMA 278(9):733–738
Bradbury M (1999) Representations of death: a social psychological perspective. Routledge, London
Chochinov HM (2002) Dignity in the terminally ill: a cross-sectional, cohort study. Lancet 360:2026–2030
Chochinov HM, Hack T, McClement S et al (2002) Dignity in the terminally ill: a developing empirical model. Soc Sci Med 54:433–443
Clark D (2002) Between hope and acceptance: the medicalisation of dying. BMJ 324:905–907
Dekkers W; Sandman L, Webb D (2002) Good death or good life as a goal of palliative care In: ten Have H, Clark D (eds) The ethics of palliative care: European perspectives. Open University Press, Philadelphia, pp 106–125
DelVecchio Good M, Gadmer N, Ruopp P et al (2004) Narrative nuances on good and bad deaths: internists’ tales from high-technology work places. Soc Sci Med 58:939–953
Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL (1998) The promise of a good death. Lancet 351:21–29
Hart B, Sainsbury P, Short S (1998) Whose dying? A sociological critique of the ‘good death’. Mortality 3(1):65–77
Hickey G, Kipping C (1996) A multi-stage approach to the coding of data from open-ended questions. Nurse Res 4:81–91
Johnson P (1998) An analysis of “dignity”. Theor Med Bioeth 19:337–352
Kissane DW, Clarke D, Street A (2001) Demoralization syndrome—relevant psychiatric diagnosis for palliative care. J Palliat Care 17(1):12–21
Macklin R (2004) Reflections on the human dignity symposium: is dignity a useless concept? J Palliat Care 20(3):212–216
Mak J, Clinton M (1999) Promoting a good death: an agenda for outcomes research—a review of the literature. Nurs Ethics 6(2):97–106
Marton F, Dahlgren LO, Svensson L, Säljö R (1977) Inlärning och omvärldsuppfattning (Learning and conception of the world). AWE/Gebers, Stockholm
McDonald M (2004) Dignity at the end of our days: personal, familial, and cultural location. J Palliat Care 20(3):163–170
McNamara B (2004) Good enough death: autonomy and choice in Australian palliative care. Soc Sci Med 58:929–938
Morgan DL (1993) Qualitative content analysis: a guide to paths not taken. Qual Health Res 3:112–121
The Oregon Death with Dignity Act. Oregon Revised Statutes. Available from: http://www.ohd.hr.state.or.us/chs/pas/statute.pdf
Payne S, Hillier R, Langley-Evans A et al (1996) Impact of witnessing death on hospice patients. Soc Sci Med 43(12):1785–1894
Pullman D (2004) Death, dignity, and moral nonsense. J Palliat Care 20(3):171–178
Seale C (2004) Media constructions of dying alone: a form of ‘bad death’. Soc Sci Med 58:967–974
Statens offentliga utredningar (Official government commission) (2001) Döden angår oss alla—värdig vård vid livets slut (Death becomes us all—dignified care at the end of life). SOU 2001:6, Fritzes, Stockholm
Street A, Kissane DW (2001) Constructions of dignity in end-of-life care. J Palliat Care 17(2):93–101
Toombs KS (2004) Living and dying with dignity: reflections on lived experience. J Palliat Care 20(3):193–200
Yalom I (1980) Existential psychotherapy. Basic Books Inc., New York
Walters G (2004) Is there such a thing as a good death? Palliat Med 18:404–408
van der Maas P, van der Wal G, Haverkate I et al (1996) Euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, and other medical practices involving the end of life in the Netherlands, 1990–1995. N Engl J Med 335:1706–1711
Weber RP (1990) Basic content analysis. Sage publications, Newbury Park
Vig EK, Pearlman RA (2004) Good and bad death from the perspective of terminally ill men. Arch Intern Med 164:977–981
Acknowledgements
This study was financially supported by Stockholms Läns Landstings FoUU (Stockholm County Council). Ingela Dellby is acknowledged for the linguistic revision.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1109-9.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karlsson, M., Milberg, A. & Strang, P. Dying with dignity according to Swedish medical students. Support Care Cancer 14, 334–339 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-005-0893-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-005-0893-5