Skip to main content
Log in

Management of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures: a systematic review of the literature

  • Review
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The management of unstable traumatic thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficits remains controversial. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of operative and conservative treatment of unstable traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. PubMed was used to search for articles published from January 1992 to January 2003 using a variety of keywords. References were checked to identify additional studies. Inclusion criteria were: (1) traumatic lumbar, thoracic or thoracolumbar fractures, (2) unstable fractures without neurological deficits, (3) a comparison between operative and conservative treatment, (4) at least ten patients were included in the study. Seventeen studies were identified; four prospective and 13 retrospective studies. Sample sizes in 15 studies were relatively small (18–100 patients); two studies had larger sample sizes. Comparison among different studies was difficult due to insufficient description of interventions, different outcome measures, and different length of follow-up periods. The current literature does not provide a reliable answer to whether operative or conservative treatment is more effective for unstable traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. High quality randomised controlled trials are direly needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andreychik DA et al (1996) Burst fractures of the second through fifth lumbar vertebrae. Clinical and radiographic results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:1156–1166

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blauth M et al (1999) Inter-observer reliability in the classification of thoraco-lumbar spinal injuries. Orthopade 28:662–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dai LD (2002) Low lumbar spinal fractures: management options. Injury 33:579–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dai LY (2001) Remodeling of the spinal canal after thoracolumbar burst fractures. Clin Orthop 382:119–123

    Google Scholar 

  5. Domenicucci M et al (1996) Thoracolumbar fractures without neurosurgical involvement: surgical or conservative treatment?. J Neurosurg.Sci 40:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  6. El Awad AA, Othman W, Al Moutaery KR (2002) Treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Saudi Med J 23:689–694

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gertzbein SD (1992) Scoliosis Research Society. Multicenter spine fracture study. Spine 17:528–540

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gotzen L, Puplat D, Junge A. (1992) Indications, technique and results of monosegmental dorsal spondylodesis in wedge compression fractures (grade II) of the thoracolumbar spine. Unfallchirurg 95:445–454

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hitchon PW et al (1998) Management options in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Surg Neurol 49:619–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Korthals-de Bos I et al (2004) Economic evaluations and randomized trials in spinal disorders: principles and methods. Spine 29:442–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kraemer WJ et al (1996) Functional outcome of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit. J Orthop Trauma 10:541–544

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Oner FC et al (2002) Some complications of common treatment schemes of thoracolumbar spine fractures can be predicted with magnetic resonance imaging: prospective study of 53 patients with 71 fractures. Spine 27:629–636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramieri A et al (2000) The results of the surgical and conservative treatment of non-neurologic comminuted thoracolumbar fractures. Chir Organi Mov 85:129–135

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rechtine GR, Cahill D, Chrin AM (1999) Treatment of thoracolumbar trauma: comparison of complications of operative versus nonoperative treatment. J Spinal Disord 12:406–409

    Google Scholar 

  15. Resch H et al (2000) Surgical vs. conservative treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar transition. Unfallchirurg 103:281–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Romero J, Vilar G, Bravo P (1994) Fractures of the dorsolumbar spine with neurological lesions A comparison of different treatments. Int Orthop 18:157–163

    Google Scholar 

  17. Seybold EA et al (1999) Functional outcome of low lumbar burst fractures. A multicenter review of operative and nonoperative treatment of L3-L5. Spine 24:2154–2161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shen WJ, Liu TJ, Shen YS (2001) Nonoperative treatment versus posterior fixation for thoracolumbar junction burst fractures without neurologic deficit. Spine 26:1038–1045

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. White AA, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical biomechanics of the spine. Lippincott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yazici M et al (1996) Spinal canal remodeling in burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: a computerized tomographic comparison between operative and nonoperative treatment. J Spinal Disord 9:409–413

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole van der Roer.

Additional information

A comment to this article can be found under http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0848-4

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Roer, N., de Lange, E.S.M., Bakker, F.C. et al. Management of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 14, 527–534 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0847-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-004-0847-5

Keywords

Navigation