Abstract
Extensive anatomical differences suggest that cervical and lumbar discs may have functional differences also. We investigated human cervical discs using “stress profilometry”. Forty-six cadaveric cervical motion segments aged 48-90 years were subjected to a compressive load of 200 N for 20 s, while compressive ‘stress’ was recorded along the posterior-anterior midline of the disc using a pressure transducer, side-mounted in a 0.9 mm diameter needle. Stress profiles were repeated with the transducer orientated horizontally and vertically, and with the specimen in neutral, flexed and extended postures. Profiles were repeated again following creep loading (150 N, 2 h) which simulated diurnal water loss in vivo. Stress profiles were reproducible, and measured “stress” at each location was proportional to applied load. Stress profiles usually showed a hydrostatic nucleus with regions of higher compressive stress concentrated anteriorly in flexion, and posteriorly in extension. Stress concentrations increased in degenerated discs and following creep. Some features were unique to cervical discs: many showed a stress gradient across their central regions, even though vertical and horizontal stresses were equal to each other, and stress concentrations in the posterior annulus were generally small. Central regions of many cervical discs show the characteristics of a “tethered fluid” which can equalise stress over small distances, but not large. This may be attributable to their fibrous texture. The small radial diameter of the cervical posterior annulus may facilitate buckling and thereby prevent it from sustaining high compressive stresses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams MA (1995) Mechanical testing of the spine. An appraisal of methodology, results, and conclusions. Spine 20:2151–2156
Adams MA, Bogduk N, Burton K, Dolan P (2006) The biomechanics of back pain. 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
Adams MA, Dolan P Hutton WC (1986) The stages of disc degeneration as revealed by discograms, J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 68:36–41
Adams MA, Freeman BJ, Morrison HP et al (2000) Mechanical initiation of intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 25:1625–1636
Adams MA, Kerin AJ, Bhatia LS et al (1999) Experimental determination of stress distributions in articular cartilage before and after sustained loading. Clin Biomech 14:88–96
Adams MA, May S, Freeman BJ et al (2000) Effects of backward bending on lumbar intervertebral discs. Relevance to physical therapy treatments for low back pain. Spine 25:431–437 discussion 438
Adams MA, McMillan DW, Green TP et al (1996) Sustained loading generates stress concentrations in lumbar intervertebral discs. Spine 21:434–438
Adams MA, McNally DS, Chinn H et al (1994) Posture and the compressive strength of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech 9(5):5–14
Adams MA, McNally DS, Dolan P (1996) ‘Stress’ distributions inside intervertebral discs. The effects of age and degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:965–972
Adams MA, Roughley PJ (2006) What is intervertebral disc degeneration, and what causes it? Spine 31:2151–2161
Botsford DJ, Esses SI, Ogilvie-Harris DJ (1994) In vivo diurnal variation in intervertebral disc volume and morphology. Spine 19:935–940
Chu JYY, Skrzypiec D, Pollintine P et al (2007) Can compressive stress be measured experimentallywithin the annulus fibrosus of degenerated intervertebral discs? Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] (in press)
Cripton PA, Dumas GA, Nolte L (2001) A minimally disruptive technique for measuring intervertebral disc pressure in vitro: application to the cervical spine. J Biomech 34:545–549
Dolan P, Adams MA (2001) Recent advances in lumbar spinal mechanics and their significance for modelling. Clin Biomech 16:S8–S16
Dolan P, Earley M, Adams MA (1994) Bending and compressive stresses acting on the lumbar spine during lifting activities. J Biomech 27:1237–1248
Dunlop RB, Adams MA, Hutton WC (1984) Disc space narrowing and the lumbar facet joints. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 66:706–710
Edwards WT, Ordway NR, Zheng Y et al (2001) Peak stresses observed in the posterior lateral anulus. Spine 26:1753–1759
Kettler A, Rohlmann F, Neidlinger-Wilke C et al (2006) Validity and interobserver agreement of a new radiographic grading system for intervertebral disc degeneration: part II. Cervical spine. Eur Spine J 15:732–41
McMillan DW, Garbutt G, Adams MA (1996) Effect of sustained loading on the water content of intervertebral discs: implications for disc metabolism. Ann Rheum Dis 55:880–887
McMillan DW, McNally DS, Garbutt G et al (1996) Stress distributions inside intervertebral discs: the validity of experimental ‘stress profilometry’. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 210:81–87
McNally DS, Adams MA (1992) Internal intervertebral disc mechanics as revealed by stress profilometry. Spine 17:66–73
McNally DS, Adams MA, Goodship AE (1993) Can intervertebral disc prolapse be predicted by disc mechanics? Spine 18:1525–1530
McNally DS, Shackleford IM, Goodship AE et al (1996) In vivo stress measurement can predict pain on discography. Spine 21:2580–2587
Mercer S, Bogduk N (1999) The ligaments and anulus fibrosus of human adult cervical intervertebral discs. Spine 24:619–626 discussion 627–628
Mercer SR, Jull GA (1996) Review: morphology of the cervical intervertebral disc: implications for McKenzie’s model of the disc derangement syndrome. Manual Therapy 2:76–81
Nachemson A (1965) In vivo discometry in lumbar discs with irregular nucleograms. Some differences in stress distribution between normal and moderately degenerated discs. Acta Orthop Scand 36:418–434
Olmarker K, Nutu M, Storkson R (2003) Changes in spontaneous behavior in rats exposed to experimental disc herniation are blocked by selective TNF-alpha inhibition. Spine 28:1635–1641 discussion 1642
Pearcy MJ, Tibrewal SB (1984) Lumbar intervertebral disc and ligament deformations measured in vivo. Clin Orthop 191:281–286
Polga DJ, Beaubien BP, Kallemeier PM et al (2004) Measurement of in vivo intradiscal pressure in healthy thoracic intervertebral discs. Spine 29:1320–1324
Pollintine P, Przybyla AS, Dolan P et al (2004) Neural arch load-bearing in old and degenerated spines. J Biomech 37:197–204
Pospiech J, Stolke D, Wilke HJ et al (1999) Intradiscal pressure recordings in the cervical spine. Neurosurgery 44:379–384 discussion 384–385
Przybyla A, Pollintine P, Bedzinski R et al (2006) Outer annulus tears have less effect than endplate fracture on stress distributions inside intervertebral discs: relevance to disc degeneration. Clin Biomech 21:1013–1019
Przybyla A, Skrzypiec D, Pollintine P et al (2007) Strength of the cervical spine in compression and bending. Spine (in press)
Ranu HS (1990) Measurement of pressures in the nucleus and within the annulus of the human spinal disc: due to extreme loading [published erratum appears in Proc Inst Mech Eng 1991;205(1):following 53], Proc Inst Mech Eng [H], 204:141–6
Wigfield CC, Skrzypiec D, Jackowski A et al (2003) Internal stress distribution in cervical intervertebral discs: the influence of an artificial cervical joint and simulated anterior interbody fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:441–449
Zhao F, Pollintine P, Hole BD (2005) Discogenic origins of spinal instability. Spine 30:2621–2630
Acknowledgments
This study was funded in the UK by the BBSRC. Patricia Dolan was a Research Fellow of the Arthritis Research Campaign. Conflict of interest statement: all authors have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Skrzypiec, D.M., Pollintine, P., Przybyla, A. et al. The internal mechanical properties of cervical intervertebral discs as revealed by stress profilometry. Eur Spine J 16, 1701–1709 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0458-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0458-z