Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Corticosteroids in peri-radicular infiltration for radicular pain: a randomised double blind controlled trial. One year results and subgroup analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of corticosteroids in patients with radicular pain due to lumbar disc herniation or lumbar spinal stenosis through a prospective randomised, double blind controlled trial, and whether there was an effect on subsequent interventions such as additional root blocks or surgery. Peri-radicular infiltration of corticosteroids has previously been shown to offer no additional benefit in patients with sciatica compared to local anaesthetic alone. It is not known if the response to peri-radicular infiltration is less marked in certain subgroups of patients such as those with radicular pain due to lumbar spinal stenosis. Previous studies have suggested that peri-radicular infiltration of corticosteroids may obviate the need for subsequent interventions and we therefore further investigated this in the current study. We randomised 150 patients to receive a single injection with either bupivacaine alone or bupivacaine and methylprednisolone. Patients were assessed at 6 weeks and 3 months after the injection using standard outcome measures including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue score for leg pain and patient’s subjective assessment of outcome. At 1-year follow-up, we looked at the outcome in terms of the need for subsequent interventions such as additional root blocks or surgery. At 3-month follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in the standard outcome measures between the two injection groups. At a minimum 1-year post injection, there was no difference in the need for subsequent interventions in either group. Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis had a less marked reduction in the ODI at 3 months with a mean change of 3.3 points when compared with 15 points for patients with lumbar disc herniation. In conclusion, peri-radicular infiltration of corticosteroids for sciatica does not provide any additional benefit when compared to local anaesthetic injection alone. Corticosteroids do not obviate the need for subsequent interventions such as additional root blocks or surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Autio RA, Karpinnen J, Kurunlahti M (2004) Effect of periradicular methylprednisolone on spontaneous resorption of intervertebral disc herniations. Spine 29(15):1601–1607. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000132511.46818.67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carette S, Leclaire R, Marcoux S et al (1997) Epidural corticosteroid injections for sciatica due to herniated nucleus pulposus. N Engl J Med 336(23):1634–1640. doi:10.1056/NEJM199706053362303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cuckler JM, Bernini PA, Wiesel SW et al (1985) The use of epidural steroids in the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. A prospective, randomised, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67-A(1):63–66

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fairbank J, Couper J, Davies JB et al (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271–273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenough CG, Fraser RD (1992) Assessment of outcome in patients with low back pain. Spine 17:36–41. doi:10.1097/00007632-199201000-00006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Holt AE, Shaw NJ, Shetty A, Greenough CG (2002) The reliability of the low back outcome score for back pain. Spine 27(2):206–210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Karpinnen J, Malmivaara A, Kurunlahti M (2001) Periradicular infiltration for sciatica. A randomised controlled trial. Spine 26(9):1059–1067. doi:10.1097/00007632-200105010-00015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Luijsterburg PAJ, Verhagen AP, Ostelo RWJG et al (2007) Effectiveness of conservative treatments for the lumbosacral radicular syndrome: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 16:881–899. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0367-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lutz GE, Vad VB, Wisneski RJ (1998) Fluoroscopic transforaminal epidural steroids, an outcome study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79:1362–1366. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90228-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Muramoto T, Atsuta Y, Iwahara T (1997) The action of prostaglandin E2 and triamcinolone acetonide on the firing activity of lumbar nerve roots. Int Orthop 21(3):172–175. doi:10.1007/s002640050144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ng L, Chaudhary N, Sell P (2005) The efficacy of corticosteroids in periradicular infiltration for chronic radicular pain. A randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Spine 30(8):857–862. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000158878.93445.a0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ng L, Sell P (2004) Predictive value of the duration of sciatica for lumbar discectomy, a prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86-B(4):546–549

    Google Scholar 

  13. Olmarker K, Blomquist J, Stromberg J et al (1995) Inflammatogenic properties of nucleus pulposus. Spine 20:665–669. doi:10.1097/00007632-199503150-00006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Olmarker K, Byrod G, Cornefjord M et al (1994) Effects of methylprednisolone on nucleus pulposus-induced nerve root injury. Spine 19:1803–1808. doi:10.1097/00007632-199408150-00003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Nordborg C (1993) Autologous nucleus pulposus induces neurophysiologic and histologic changes in porcine cauda equine nerve roots. Spine 18:1425–1432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Riew DK, Yin Y, Gilula L et al (2000) The effect of nerve root injections on the need for operative treatment of lumbar radicular pain: a prospective, randomised, controlled, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A(11):1589–1593

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Roland M, Fairbank J (2000) The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 25(24):3115–3124. doi:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Slipman CW, Chow DW (2002) Therapeutic spinal corticosteroid injections for the management of radiculopathies. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 13(3):697–711

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tajima T, Fuukawa K, Kuramochi E (1980) Selective lumbosacral radiculopathy and block. Spine 5:68–77. doi:10.1097/00007632-198001000-00013

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Thomas E, Cyteval C, Abiad L et al (2003) Efficacy of transforaminal versus interspinous corticosteroid injection in discal radiuculagia—a prospective, randomised, double-blind study. Clin Rheumatol 22:299–304. doi:10.1007/s10067-003-0736-z

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vad VB, Bhat AL, Lutz GE et al (2002) Transforaminal epidural steroid injections in lumbosacral radiculopathy: a prospective randomised study. Spine 27:11–16. doi:10.1097/00007632-200201010-00005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang R, Lagakos SW, Ware JH (2007) Statistics in medicine—reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials. N Engl J Med 357(21):2189–2194. doi:10.1056/NEJMsr077003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Weber H (1994) The natural history of disc herniation and the influence of intervention. Spine 19:2234–2238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Weber H, Holme I, Amlie E (1993) The natural cause of acute sciatica with nerve root symptoms in a double-blind placebo controlled trial evaluating the effect of piroxicam. Spine 18:1433–1438. doi:10.1097/00007632-199312000-00021

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suhayl Tafazal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tafazal, S., Ng, L., Chaudhary, N. et al. Corticosteroids in peri-radicular infiltration for radicular pain: a randomised double blind controlled trial. One year results and subgroup analysis. Eur Spine J 18, 1220–1225 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1000-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1000-2

Keywords

Navigation