Abstract
There has been no agreement among different authors on guidelines to specify the situations in which arthrodesis is justified in terms of results, risks and complications. The aim of this study was to identify preoperative predictors of outcome after decompressive lumbar surgery and instrumented posterolateral fusion. A prospective observational study design was performed on 203 consecutive patients. Potential preoperative predictors of outcome included sociodemographic factors as well as variables pertaining to the preoperative clinical situation, diagnosis, expectations and surgery. Separate multiple linear regression models were used to assess the association between selected predictors and outcome variables, defined as the improvement after 1 year on the visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain, VAS for leg pain, physical component scores (PCS) of SF-36 and Oswestry disability index (ODI). Follow-up was available for 184 patients (90.6%). Patients with higher educational level and optimistic preoperative expectations had a more favourable postoperative leg pain (VAS) and ODI. Smokers had less leg pain relief. Patients with better mental component score (emotional health) had greater ODI improvement. Less preoperative walking capacity predicted more leg pain relief. Patients with disc herniation had greater relief from back pain and more PCS and ODI improvement. More severe lumbar pain was predictive of less improvement on ODI and PCS. Age, sex, body mass index, analgesic use, surgeon, self-rated health, the number of decompressed levels and the length of fusion had no association with outcome. This study concludes that a higher educational level, optimistic expectations for improvement, the diagnosis of “disc herniation”, less walking capacity and good emotional health may significantly improve clinical outcome. Smoking and more severe lumbar pain are predictors of worse results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aalto TJ, Malmivaara A, Kovacs F et al (2006) Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review. Spine 31:E648–E663
Alonso J, Prieto L, Anto JM (1995) The Spanish version of the SF-36 health survey (the SF-36 health questionnaire): an instrument for measuring clinical results. Med Clin (Barc.) 104:771–776
Andersen T, Christensen FB, Laursen M (2001) Smoking as a predictor of negative outcome in lumbar spinal fusion. Spine 26:2623–2628
Atlas SJ, Deyo RA, Keller RB (1996) The maine lumbar spine study, part II: 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica. Spine 21:1777–1786
Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Robson D (2000) Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: four-year outcomes from the maine lumbar spine study. Spine 25:556–562
Belsley DA (1991) Conditioning diagnostics: collinearity and weak data in regression. Wiley, New York
Bombardier C (2000) Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations. Spine 25:3100–3103
Bono CM, Lee CK (2004) Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years: influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcome. Spine 29:455–463
Chen L, Tang T, Yang H (2003) Complications associated with posterior lumbar interbody fusion using Bagby and Kuslich method for treatment of spondylolisthesis. Chin Med J Engl 116:99–103
Chen Q, Baba H, Kamitani K (1994) Postoperative bone re-growth in lumbar spinal stenosis: a multivariate analysis of 48 patients. Spine 19:2144–2149
Cherkin D, Deyo RA, Loeser JD (1994) An international comparison of back surgery rates. Spine 19:1201–1206
Ciol MA, Deyo RA, Howell E (1996) An assessment of surgery for spinal stenosis: time trends, geographic variations, complications, and reoperations. J Am Geriatr Soc 44:285–290
Cobo Soriano J (2008) Estudio prospectivo de resultados clínicos y de factores pronósticos en artrodesis instrumentada lumbar. Análisis económico y de relación de coste efectividad. http://hdl.handle.net/10486/2099
Davis H (1994) Increasing rates of cervical and lumbar spine surgery in the United States, 1979–1990. Spine 19:1117–1123
Derby R, Lettice JJ, Kula TA (2005) Single-level lumbar fusion in chronic discogenic low-back pain: psychological and emotional status as a predictor of outcome measured using the 36-item short form. J Neurosurg Spine 3:255–261
Deyo RA, Andersson G, Bombardier C (1994) Outcome measures for studying patients with low back pain. Spine 19:2032S–2036S
Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Loeser JD (1992) Morbidity and mortality in association with operations on the lumbar spine: the influence of age, diagnosis, and procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:536–543
Deyo RA, Ciol MA, Cherkin DC (1993) Lumbar spinal fusion: a cohort study of complications, reoperations, and resource use in the Medicare population. Spine 18:1463–1470
Dionne C, Koepsell TD, Von KM (1995) Formal education and back-related disability: in search of an explanation. Spine 20:2721–2730
Fardon DF (2001) Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Spine 26:461–462
Feldmann PH, Wittenberg RH (2003) Surgical treatment of spinal stenosis. Orthopade 32:877–888
Flood P, Daniel D (2004) Intranasal nicotine for postoperative pain treatment. Anesthesiology 101:1417–1421
Flórez García M, García Pérez MA, García Pérez F (1995) Adaptación transcultural a la población española de la escala de incapacidad por dolor lumbar de Oswestry. Rehabilitación 29:138–145
Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P et al (2002) Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine 27:1131–1141
Gibson JNA, Grant TC, Waddell G (1999) The cochrane review of surgery for lumbar disc prolapse and degenerative lumbar spondylosis. Spine 24:1820–1832
Gibson JN, Waddell G (2005) Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis: updated cochrane review. Spine 30:2312–2320
Glassman SD, Anagnost SC, Parker A (2000) The effect of cigarette smoking and smoking cessation on spinal fusion. Spine 25:2608–2615
Hagg O, Fritzell P, Ekselius L (2003) Predictors of outcome in fusion surgery for chronic low back pain: a report from the Swedish lumbar spine study. Eur Spine J 12:22–33
Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT (1991) Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:802–808
Herron LD, Turner J, Clancy S (1986) The differential utility of the Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory: a predictor of outcome in lumbar laminectomy for disc herniation versus spinal stenosis. Spine 11:847–850
Iversen MD, Daltroy LH, Fossel AH (1998) The prognostic importance of patient pre-operative expectations of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient Educ Couns 34:169–178
Jacobsson L, Lindgarde F, Manthorpe R (1992) Effect of education, occupation and some lifestyle factors on common rheumatic complaints in a Swedish group aged 50–70 years. Ann Rheum Dis 51:835–843
Jenkins LT, Jones AL, Harms JJ (1994) Prognostic factors in lumbar spinal fusion. Contemp Orthop 29:173–180
Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Larson MG (1991) The outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:809–816
Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Lew RA (1997) Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes. Spine 22:1123–1131
Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Brick GW (1995) Clinical correlates of patient satisfaction after laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 20:1155–1160
Katz JN, Stucki G, Lipson SJ (1999) Predictors of surgical outcome in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 24:2229–2233
Kuntz KM, Snider RK, Weinstein JN (2000) Cost-effectiveness of fusion with and without instrumentation for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. Spine 25:1132–1139
Larequi-Lauber T, Vader JP, Burnand B (1997) Appropriateness of indications for surgery of lumbar disc hernia and spinal stenosis. Spine 22:203–209
Lutz GK, Butzlaff ME, Atlas SJ (1999) The relation between expectations and outcomes in surgery for sciatica. J Gen Intern Med 14:740–744
Pheasant HC, Gilbert D, Goldfarb J (1979) The MMPI as a predictor of outcome in low-back surgery. Spine 4:78–84
Pincus T, Callahan LF, Burkhauser RV (1987) Most chronic diseases are reported more frequently by individuals with fewer than 12 years of formal education in the age 18–64 United States population. J Chronic Dis 40:865–874
Postacchini F, Cinotti G (1992) Bone regrowth after surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74:862–869
Trief PM, Ploutz-Snyder R, Fredrickson BE (2006) Emotional health predicts pain and function after fusion: a prospective multicenter study. Spine 31:823–830
Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L (1992) Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine 17:1–8
Vilagut G, Ferrer M, Rajmil L (2005) The Spanish version of the short form 36 health survey: a decade of experience and new developments. Gac Sanit 19:135–150
Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Olson PR (2006) United States’ trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992–2003. Spine 31:2707–2714
Wiltse L, Kikardy-Willis W, McIvor G (1976) The treatment of spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop 115:83
Zdeblick TA (1993) A prospective, randomized study of lumbar fusion: preliminary results. Spine 18:983–991
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cobo Soriano, J., Sendino Revuelta, M., Fabregate Fuente, M. et al. Predictors of outcome after decompressive lumbar surgery and instrumented posterolateral fusion. Eur Spine J 19, 1841–1848 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1284-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1284-2