Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modified condylotomy versus conventional conservative treatment in painful reciprocal clicking—a preliminary prospective study in eight patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Modified condylotomy may be relevant in severe painful reciprocal clicking of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) where conservative treatment is insufficient. The effect of the modified condylotomy was analyzed and compared with conventional nonsurgical treatment in a randomized pilot study of eight patients, 19–44 years of age, with severe painful reciprocal clicking. Before and after treatment, assessments were performed by subjective reports, clinical recordings, and blinded evaluations of radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Based on the clinical evaluations before treatment, all conditions were disc displacements with reduction and arthralgia (Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders), but based on MRI, one patient had disc displacement without reduction and another had normal disc position. The treatment effect was significantly better and the disorders were significantly more reduced with condylotomy than with conventional nonsurgical treatment (P < 0.05, Mann–Whitney U test). In the surgical group, the clicking and locking had disappeared, the pain during function was significantly reduced (P < 0.05, Friedman ANOVA), and in two patients the disc position was normalized. The clicking still persisted in the nonsurgical patients and the disc position was unchanged. Our conclusion is that modified condylotomy is a promising option to reduce symptoms and signs in severe painful reciprocal clicking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bakke M, Michler L, Han K, Moller E (1989) Clinical significance of isometric bite force versus electrical activity in temporal and masseter muscles. Scand J Dent Res 97:539–551

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Banks P (1997) The case against mandibular condylotomy in the treatment of the painful, deranged temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55:70–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Choi YS, Yun KI, Kim SG (2002) Long-term results of different condylotomy designs for the management of temporomandibular joint disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 93:132–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Conti PC, dos Santos CN, Kogawa EM, de Castro Ferreira Conti AC, de Araujo C dos R (2006) The treatment of painful temporomandibular joint clicking with oral splints: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 137:1008–1014

    Google Scholar 

  5. de Bont LG, Stegenga B (1993) Pathology of the temporomandibular joint internal derangement and osteoarthrosis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 22:71–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dolwick MF (1995) Intra-articular disc displacement. Part I: its questionable role in temporomandibular joint pathology. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:1069–1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dolwick MF (1997) The role of temporomandibular joint surgery in the treatment of patients with internal derangements. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 83:150–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dworkin SF, LeResche L (1992) Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 6:301–355

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eberhard D, Bantleon HP, Steger W (2002) The efficacy of anterior repositioning splint therapy studied by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Orthod 24:343–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Elfving L, Helkimo M, Magnusson T (2002) Prevalence of different temporomandibular sounds, with emphasis on disc-displacement, in patients with temporomandibular disorders and controls. Swed Dent J 26:9–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Greene CS, Marbach JJ (1982) Epidemiologic studies of mandibular dysfunction: a critical review. J Prosthet Dent 48:184–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hall HD (1996) Modification of the modified condylotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54:548–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hall HD, Navarro EZ, Gibbs SJ (2000) One-and three-year prospective outcome study of modified condylotomy for treatment of reducing disc displacement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58:7–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hall HD, Navarro EZ, Gibbs SJ (2000) Prospective study of modified condylotomy for treatment of nonreducing disk displacement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89:147–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hall HD, Nickerson JW Jr, McKenna SJ (1993) Modified condylotomy for treatment of the painful temporomandibular joint with a reducing disc. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:133–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Langemark M, Olesen J (1987) Pericranial tenderness in tension headache. A blind controlled study. Cephalalgia 7:249–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Larheim TA, Westesson PL, Sano T (2001) Temporomandibular joint disk displacement: comparison in asymptomatic volunteers and patients. Radiology 21:428–432

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lundh H, Westesson PL (1991) Clinical signs of temporomandibular joint internal derangement in adults. An epidemiologic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 72:637–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marklund S, Wanman A (2007) Incidence and prevalence of temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction. A one-year prospective study of university students. Acta Odontol Scand 65:119–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Milam SB (1995) Articular disk displacements and degenerative temporomandibular joint disease. In: Sessle BJ, Bryant PS, Dionna RA (eds) Temporomandibular disorders and related pain conditions. Progress in pain research and management, vol. 4. IASP, Seattle, pp 89–112

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nickerson JW, Veaco NS (1989) Condylotomy in surgery of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 1:303–327

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rammelsberg P, Pospiech PR, Jäger L, Pho Duc JM, Böhm AO, Gernet W (1997) Variability of disk position in asymptomatic volunteers and patients with internal derangements of the TMJ. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 83:393–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Reston JT, Turkelson CM (2003) Meta-analysis of surgical treatments for temporomandibular articular disorders. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:3–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sato S, Goto S, Nasu F, Motegi K (2003) Natural course of disc displacement with reduction of the temporomandibular joint: changes in clinical signs and symptoms. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61:32–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stegenga B (2001) Osteoarthritis of the temporomandibular joint organ and its relationship to disc displacement. J Orofac Pain 15:193–205

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Upton LG (1997) The case for mandibular condylotomy in the treatment of the painful, deranged temporomandibular joint. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55:64–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Upton LG, Sullivan SM (1991) The treatment of temporomandibular joint internal derangements using a modified open condylotomy: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:578–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vichaichalermvong S, Nilner M, Panmekiate S, Petersson A (1993) Clinical follow-up with different disc positions. J Orofac Pain 7:61–67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ward TG (1961) Surgery of the mandibular joint. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 28:139–152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Werther JR, Hall HD, Gibbs JS (1995) Disk position before and after modified condylotomy in 80 symptomatic temporomandibular joints. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 79:668–679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yoda T, Sakamoto I, Imai H, Honma Y, Shinjo Y, Takano A et al (2003) A randomized controlled trial of therapeutic exercise for clicking due to disk anterior displacement with reduction in the temporomandibular joint. Cranio 21:10–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors appreciate the surgical assistance rendered by Professor Søren Hillerup, DDS, Ph.D., Dr. Odont, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. The study was supported by The Danish Dental Association (Calcinfonden). The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Merete Bakke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bakke, M., Eriksson, L., Thorsen, N.M. et al. Modified condylotomy versus conventional conservative treatment in painful reciprocal clicking—a preliminary prospective study in eight patients. Clin Oral Invest 12, 353–359 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0204-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0204-x

Keywords

Navigation