Abstract
One of the biggest problems in modeling distantly related proteins is the quality of the target-template alignment. This problem often results in low quality models that do not utilize all the information available in the template structure. The divergence of alignments at a low sequence identity level, which is a hindrance in most modeling attempts, is used here as a basis for a new technique of Multiple Model Approach (MMA). Alternative alignments prepared here using different mutation matrices and gap penalties, combined with automated model building, are used to create a set of models that explore a range of possible conformations for the target protein. Models are evaluated using different techniques to identify the best model. In the set of examples studied here, the correct target structure is known, which allows the evaluation of various alignment and evaluation strategies.
For a randomly selected group of distantly homologous protein pairs representing all structural classes and various fold types, it is shown that a threading score based on simplified statistical potentials of mean force can identify the best models and, consequently, the most reliable alignment. In cases where the difference between target and template structures is significant, the threading score shows clearly that all models are wrong, therefore disqualifying the template.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 10 July 1998 / Accepted: 18 September 1998 / Published: 1 October 1998
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jaroszewski, L., Pawlowski, K. & Godzik, A. Multiple Model Approach: Exploring the Limits of Comparative Modeling. J Mol Med 4, 294–309 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s008940050087
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s008940050087