Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Perceived barriers to paracetamol (acetaminophen) prescribing, especially following rofecoxib withdrawal from the market

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor (COX-2) inhibitors were publicly subsidized in Australia for osteoarthritis. However, guidelines still recommended paracetamol as first choice therapy. When rofecoxib was withdrawn in 2004, paracetamol should have been offered as replacement. However, dispensing data indicate no increase in paracetamol use. The objective of this study was to gain understanding about barriers to paracetamol use and to identify what choices consumers were offered after rofecoxib withdrawal. We conducted two focus groups (consumers and pharmacists) and 15 semi-structured interviews (seven with patients taking rofecoxib at the time it was withdrawn in Australia, four with pharmacists, and four with general practitioners). Familiarity with and use of paracetamol, perceived strengths and weaknesses of paracetamol for chronic pain, and choices given about therapy changes were investigated. All interviews and focus groups were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed. Consumers reported that transfer of information on their medicines was limited or absent. They perceived that their knowledge about COX-2 inhibitor safety and/or appropriate use of paracetamol was lacking. Pharmacists agreed that several factors were relevant concerning paracetamol and COX-2 inhibitor use, including lack of counseling and information for consumers. Not personalizing prescribing to elderly patients was identified as a weakness. Consumers who had received rofecoxib were divided about their perceptions of the efficacy of paracetamol. It appears that when rofecoxib was withdrawn, they were not offered an opportunity to try paracetamol. Consumers in this study appeared to have poor knowledge about the opportunity to effectively use paracetamol. Consumers did not remember being given the choice to use paracetamol as regular treatment for chronic pain. Pharmacists and doctors did not appear to be discussing options for pain control well with consumers and had mismatched perceptions with consumers about paracetamol. An educational intervention to encourage more rational use of paracetamol is now being planned to provide consumers with more knowledge about paracetamol effective use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Woolf AD, Pfleger B (2003) Burde of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull WHO 81(9):646–656

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2006) Australia’s health. AIHW, Canberra (cat no. 73)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Therapeutic Guidelines: Rheumatology Writing Group (2006) Therapeutic guidelines: rheumatology. Therapeutic Guidelines, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  4. Therapeutic Guidelines: Analgesic Writing Group (2002) Therapeutic guidelines: analgesic, 4th edn. Therapeutic Guidelines, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  5. Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (2005) Acute pain management: scientific evidence, 2nd edn. Faculty of Pain Medicine

  6. Altman R, Hochberg M, Moskowitz R, Schnitzer T (2000) Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Arthritis Rheum 43:1905–1915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. European League Against Rheumatism (2003) EULAR Recommendations 2003: an evidence based approach to the management of knee osteoarthritis: Report of a Task Force of the Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 62:1145–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gastroenterological Society of Australia (GESA) (2004) NSAID therapy—maximizing the benefit, minimizing the risk. www.gesa.org.au/members_booklets/nsaid/NSAIDTherapy.pdf. Cited 12 May 2007

  9. Courtney P, Doherty M (2002) Key questions concerning paracetamol and NSAIDs for osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 61:767–773

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Barozzi N, Tett S (2006) How rofecoxib withdrawal influence overall non selective non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and paracetamol prescription in Australia? National Medicine Symposium, Canberra

  11. Barozzi N, Tett S (2007) What happened to the prescribing of other COX-2 inhibitors, paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs when rofecoxib was withdrawn in Australia? Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 16(11):1184–1191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lanas A (2005) Review article: recommendations for the clinical management of patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs—a gastroenterologist’s prospective. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1:16–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. National Prescribing Service (2007) Prexige (Lumiracoxib) withdrawn: releases. http://www.nps.org.au/site.php?page=2&content=/resources/content/prexige_withdrawn_rel.html. Cited 15 Sept 2007

  14. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2004). FDA Public Health Advisory: Safety of Vioxx. www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/vioxx/PHA_vioxx.htm. Cited 12 May 2007

  15. National Prescribing Service (NPS) (2004). Switching patients from Vioxx. http://www.nps.org.au/resources/content/nps_factsheet_vioxx_20041001.pdf. Cited 5 May 2007

  16. National Prescribing Service (2005) Principles of evaluating new drugs. NPS News 43

  17. National Prescribing Service (2007) NPS issues prescribing advice following Lumiracoxib withdrawal. http://www.nps.org.au/resources/content/Prexige_Media_Release_HP.pdf. Cited 17 Sept 2007

  18. Kelman CW, Pearson SA, Day R, Holman C, Kliewer EV, Henry DA (2007) Evaluating medicines: let’s use all the evidence. Med J Aust 186(5):249–252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fung M, Thornton A, Mybeck K, Hsiao-Hui J, Hornbuckle K, Muniz E (2001) Evaluation of the characteristics of safety withdrawal of prescription drugs from worldwide pharmaceutical markets—1960 to 1999*. Drug Inf J 35:293–317

    Google Scholar 

  20. Avorn J (2004) Powerful medicines. The benefits, risks, and costs of prescription drugs. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Langton P, Hankey G, Eikelboom J (2004) Cardiovascular safety of rofecoxib (Vioxx): lessons learned and unanswered questions. Med J Aust 181(10):525–526

    Google Scholar 

  22. Psaty B, Furberg C (2005) COX-2 inhibitors—lessons in drug safety. N Engl J Med 352(11):1133–1135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Miller E, MacKeigan L, Rosser W, Marshman J (1999) Effects of perceived patient demand on prescribing anti-infective drugs. Can Med Ass J 161:139–142

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Spence M, Teleki S, Cheetham C (2002) Direct-to-consumer promotion of prescription drugs: the case of COX-2 inhibitors. Acad Health Serv Res Health Policy Meet 19(41)

  25. Coenen S, Michiels B, Renard D, Denekens J (2006) Antibiotic prescribing for acute cough: the effect of perceived patient demand. Br J Gen Pract 56(524):183–190

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Triggle D (2005) Vaccines, viagra, and vioxx: medicines, markets, and money—when life-saving meets life-style. Drug Dev Res 64:90–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cabana M, Rand C, Powe N, Wu A, Wilson M, Abboud P et al (1999) Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 282(15):1458–1465

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. McNamara C (2006) Basics of conducting focus groups. http://www.managementhelp.org/evaluatn/focusgrp.htm. Cited 15 Mar 2007

  29. Romney A, Batchelder W, Weller S (1986) Culture as consensus: a theory of culture and informant accuracy. Am Anthropol 88:313–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Carlsson F, Merlo J, Lindstrom M, Ostergren PO, Lithman T (2006) Representativity of a postal public health questionnaire survey in Sweden, with special reference to ethnic differences in participation. Scand J Public Health 34(2):132–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Green C, Pope C (1999) Gender, psychosocial factors and the use of medical services: a longitudinal analysis. Soc Sci Med 48:1363–1372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bertakis K, Azari R, Helms L, Callahan E, Robbins J (2000) Gender differences in the utilization of health care services. J Fam Pract 49(2):147–152

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Robinson A, Thomson R (2001) Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools. Qual Health Care 10:i34–i38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Callahan CA, Hojat M, Gonnella JS (2007) Volunteer bias in medical education research: an empirical study of over three decades of longitudinal data. Med Educ 41(8):746–753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Greenbaum T (1998) The handbook for focus group research, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadia Barozzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barozzi, N., Tett, S.E. Perceived barriers to paracetamol (acetaminophen) prescribing, especially following rofecoxib withdrawal from the market. Clin Rheumatol 28, 509–519 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-008-1077-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-008-1077-8

Keywords

Navigation