Skip to main content
Log in

Applying qualitative content analysis to study online support communities

  • Long Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the increasing popularity of online support communities for people with disabilities and older people, the research domain of online communities is gaining more and more research potential in the area of inclusive design. There are many studies that investigate social interactions within online communities. However, researchers seem to apply a variety of different methods in very different ways. This makes it often difficult to decide on the appropriate method. In order to provide guidance to researchers in the area of inclusive design, this paper reviews past research in this area and presents a self-contained methodology that is based on qualitative content analysis for studying social interactions in online support communities for people with special needs. A case study from an online community for older people is presented in order to set the theory into context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Apgar, M.: Ethnography and cognition. In: Emerson, R.M. (ed.) Contemporary Field Research: A Collection of Readings, pp. 68–77. Waveland, Prospect Heights, IL (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baym, N.K.: Tune in, log on: Soaps, fandom, and online community. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks: CA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cavazos, E.A., Morin, G.: Cyberspace and the Law: Your Rights and Duties in the On-Line World. MIT Press, Palatino (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cavanaugh, A.: Behaviour in Public?: Ethics in online ethnography. Cybersociology, 6. http://www.cybersociology.com/files/6_2_ethicsinonlineethnog.html (1999). Accessed 20 March 2007

  5. Cohen, J.: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educat. Psychol. Measure. 20, 37–46 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Coulson, N.S.: Receiving social support online: an analysis of a computer-mediated support group for individuals living with irritable bowel syndrome. CyberPsychol. Behav. 8(6), 580–584 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Culnan, M.J., Markus, M.L.: Information technologies. In: Jablin, F., Putnam, L.L., Roberts, K., Porter, L. (eds.) Handbook of Organizational Communication, pp. 420–443. Sage, Newbury Park, CA (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  8. De Souza, C.S., Preece, J.: A framework for analyzing and understanding online communities. Interacting with Computers. Interdiscip. J. Human–Comput. Interact 16 (3), 579–610 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dennis, A.R., Kinney, S.T., Hung, Y.C.: Gender differences in the effects of media richness. Small Group Res. 30(4), 405–437 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Emerson, R.M.: Observational field work. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 7, 351–378 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ess, C.: Ethical decision-making and internet research: recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee. Association of Internet Reseacher (AoIR). http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf (2002). Accessed 20 March 2007

  12. Fayard, A-L., DeSanctis, G.: Evolution of an online forum for knowledge management professionals: a language game analysis. J. Comput-Mediat. Commun. 10(4), article 2. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/fayard.html (2005). Accessed 23 Oct 2007

  13. Feldman, M.D.: Munchausen by Internet. South. Med. J 93(7), 669–672 (2000)

  14. Fernback, J.: There is a there there. Notes toward a definition of cybercommunity. In: Jones, S. (ed.) Doing Internet Research. Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net, pp. 203–220. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Frankel, M.S., Siang, S.: Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects research on the internet. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC. http://www.aaas.org/spp/sfrl/projects/intres/report.pdf (1999). 20 March 2007

  16. Gross, E.F., Juvonen, J., Gable, S.L.: Internet use and well-being in adolescence. J. Soc. Issues 58(1), 75–90 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Henri, F.: Computer conferencing and content analysis. In: Kaye, A. (ed.) Collaborative Learning Through Computer Conferencing: The Najaden Papers, pp. 117–136. Springer-Verlag, London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Herring, S.: Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Herring, S.C.: Linguistic and critical analysis of computer-mediated communication: some ethical and scholarly considerations. Inform. Soc. 12(2), 153–168 (1996)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Herring, S.: Computer- mediated discourse analysis: an approach to researching online behavior. In: Barab, S.A., Kling, R., Gray, J.H. (eds.) Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, pp. 338–376. Cambridge University Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hillman, D.: A new method for analyzing patterns of interaction. Am. J. Distance Educat. 13(2), 37–47 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hsieh, H.-F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15(9), 1277–1285 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ito, M., O’Day, V., Adler, A., Linde, C., Mynatt, E.: Making a place for seniors on the net: seniornet, senior identity and the digital divide. Comput. Soc. 13(3), 15–21 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jacobson, D.: Doing research in cyberspace. Field Methods 11(2), 127–145 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kassarjian, H.: Content analysis in consumer research. J. Consum. Res. 4(1), 8–18 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. King, S.A.: Researching Internet communities: proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of results. Inform. Soc. 12(2), 119–127 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Klemm, P., Reppert, K., Visich, L.: A non-traditional cancer support group. The Internet. Comput. Nurs. 16(1), 31–36 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Klemm, P., Wheeler, E.: Cancer caregivers online: hope, emotional roller coaster, and physical/emotional/psychological responses. Comput. Informat. Nurs. CIN 23(1), 38–45 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kolbe, H., Burnett, M.S.: Content-analysis researchl an examination of applications with directives for improving research reliability and objectivity. J. Consum. Res. 18(2), 243–250 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kollock, P., Smith, M.: Chapter 1. Communities in cyberspace. In: Smith, M.A., Kollock, P. (eds.) Communities in Cyberspace, pp. 3–25. Routledge, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kruger, J., Epley, N., Parker, J., Ng, Z.W.: Egocentrism over e-mail: can we communicate as well as we think? J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 89(6), 925–936 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Leimeister, J. M., Krcmar, H.: Evaluation of a systematic design for a virtual patient community. J. Comput-Med. Commun 10(4), article 6. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/leimeister.html (2005). Accessed 23 Oct 2007

  34. McKenna, K.Y.A., Bargh, J.: Plan 9 from cyberspace: the implications of the internet for personality and social psychology. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 4(1), 57–75 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. McKenna, K.Y.A., Green, A.S., Gleason, M.E.J.: Relationship formation on the Internet: what’s the big attraction? J. Soc. Issues 58(1), 9–31 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Maloney-Krichmar, D., Preece, J.: A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability and community dynamics in an online health community. Trans. Human–Comput. Interact. (special issue on Social Issues and HCI) 12(2), 201–232 (2005)

  37. Mayring, P.: Qualitative content analysis. forum: qualitative social research 1(2). http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-00/2-00mayring-e.htm (2000). Accessed 20 March 2007

  38. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.: Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks: CA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mitra, A., Cohen, E.: Analyzing the web: directions and challenges. In: Jones, S. (ed.) Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net, pp. 179–202. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Paccagnella, L.: Getting the seats of your pants dirty: strategies for ethnographic research on virtual communities. J. Comput. Med. Commun 3(1). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue1/paccagnella.html (1997). Accessed 20 March 2007

  41. Peter, J., Valkenburg, P.M., Schouten, A.P.: Developing a model of adolescent friendship formation on the internet. CyperPsychol. Behav. 8(5), 423–430 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pfeil, U., Zaphiris, P.: Patterns of empathy in online communication. In: Proceedings of CHI 2007—the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Full paper (in press)

  43. Preece, J.: Empathic communities: reaching out across the Web. Interactions 2(2), 32–43 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Preece, J.: Empathic communities: balancing emotional and factual communication. Interact. Comput. 12(1), 63–77 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Preece, J.: Online Communities: Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Preece, J., Ghozati, K.: Empathic communities: offering support and sharing information in a bulletin board community. http://www.ifsm.umbc.edu/communities/UKFinal.html (1998). Accessed 20 March 2007

  47. Preece, J., Maloney-Krichmar, D.: Online communities: focusing on sociability and usability. In: Jacko, J., Sears, A. (eds.) The Human–Computer Interaction Handbook, Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, pp. 596–620. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, London, UK (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Preece, J., Maloney-Krichmar, D.:Online communities: design, theory, and practice. J. Comput-Med. Commun 10(4), article 1. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/preece.html (2005). Accessed 20 March 2007

  49. Preece, J., Maloney-Krichmar, D., Abras, C.: History of emergence of online communities. http://www.ifsm.umbc.edu/~preece/paper/6%20Final%20Enc%20preece%20et%20al.pdf (2003). Accessed 20 March 2007

  50. Reid, E.: Hierarchy & power: social control in cyberspace. In: Smith, M.A., Kollock, P. (eds.) Communities in Cyberspace, pp. 108–133. Routledge, London (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Rheingold, H.: The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier. MIT Press, Reading, MA (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Rice, R.E.: Media appropriateness: using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Commun. Res. 19(4), 451–484 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  53. Rodgers, S., Chen, Q.: Internet community group participation: psychosocial benefits for women with breast cancer. J. Comput-Mediat. Commun 10(4), article 5. http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/rodgers.html (2005). Accessed 23 Oct 2007

  54. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D.R., Archer, W.: Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. Int. J. Artif Intellig. Educat. 12(1), 8–22 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rutter, J., & Smith, G. (2002). Ethnographic Presence in Nebulous Settings: A Case Study. University of Manchester and University of Salford, UK. Retrieved 20th March, 2007 from http://www.cric.ac.uk/cric/staff/Jason_Rutter/papers/brunel.pdf

  56. Sandelowski, M.: Focus on Research Methods: Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description? Res. Nurs.Health 23(4), 334–340 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. SeniorNet (2007). Seniornet–bringing wisdom to the information age. http://www.seniornet.org/php/default.php SeniorNet20 March 2007

  58. Sharf (1999) B.F. Beyond netiquette: The ethics of doing naturalistic discourse research on the Internet. In S. Jones (ed.), Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA., pp. 243–256

  59. Sixsmith, J., Murray, C.D.: Ethical Issues in the Documentary Data Analysis of Internet Posts and Archives. Qual. Health Res. 11(3), 423–432 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Spears, R., Lea, M.: Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Commun. Res. 21(4), 427–459 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Stemler, S.: An overview of content analysis. Practical assessment, research & evaluation. http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17 (2001). Accessed 20 March 2007

  62. Sussman, S.W., Sproull, L.: . Straight talk: delivering bad news through electronic communication. info. Sys. Res 10, 2,150–166 (Feb. 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Tesch: qualitative research: analysis types and software tools. bristol, pa: falmer (1990)

  64. Thompson, L., Nadler, J.: Negotiating via information technology: theory and application. J. Soc. Issues 58, 109–124 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Thomsen, S.R., Straubhaar, J.D., Bolyard, D.M.: Ethnomethodology and the study of online communities: exploring the cyber streets. Inform. Res. 4(1). http://informationr.net/ir/4-1/paper50.html (1998). Accessed 20 March 2007

  66. Timmermann, S.: The role of information technology in older adult learning. New Direct. Adult Continu. Educat 7, 61–71 (1998)

  67. Turkle, S.: Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. Simon & Schuster, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Walther, J.B.: Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: a relational perspective. Commun. Res. 19(1), 52–90 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  69. Waskul, D., Douglass, M.: Considering the electronic participant: some polemical observations on the ethics of on-line research. Inform. Soc. 12(2), 129–139 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. White, M.H., Dorman, S.M.: Online support for caregivers: analysis of an internet Alzheimer mailgroup. Comput. Nurs. 18(4), 168–179 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Winzelberg, A.: The analysis of an electronic support group for individuals with eating disorders. Comput. Human Behav. 13(3), 393–407 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Wolf, A.: Emotional expression online: gender differences in emoticon use. CyberPsychol. Behav. 3(5), 827–833 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Wright, K.B.: The communication of social support within an on-line community for older adults: a qualitative analysis of the SeniorNet community. Qual. Res. Reports Commun. 1(2), 33–43 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Panayiotis Zaphiris.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pfeil, U., Zaphiris, P. Applying qualitative content analysis to study online support communities. Univ Access Inf Soc 9, 1–16 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-009-0154-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-009-0154-3

Keywords

Navigation