Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pan-Canadian Evaluation of Irreversible Compression Ratios (“Lossy” Compression) for Development of National Guidelines

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New technological advancements including multislice CT scanners and functional MRI, have dramatically increased the size and number of digital images generated by medical imaging departments. Despite the fact that the cost of storage is dropping, the savings are largely surpassed by the increasing volume of data being generated. While local area network bandwidth within a hospital is adequate for timely access to imaging data, efficiently moving the data between institutions requires wide area network bandwidth, which has a limited availability at a national level. A solution to address those issues is the use of lossy compression as long as there is no loss of relevant information. The goal of this study was to determine levels at which lossy compression can be confidently used in diagnostic imaging applications. In order to provide a fair assessment of existing compression tools, we tested and compared the two most commonly adopted DISCOM compression algorithms: JPEG and JPEG-2000. We conducted an extensive pan-Canadian evaluation of lossy compression applied to seven anatomical areas and five modalities using two recognized techniques: objective methods or diagnostic accuracy and subjective assessment based on Just Noticeable Difference. By incorporating both diagnostic accuracy and subjective evaluation techniques, enabled us to define a range of compression for each modality and body part tested. The results of our study suggest that at low levels of compression, there was no significant difference between the performance of lossy JPEG and lossy JPEG 2000, and that they are both appropriate to use for reporting on medical images. At higher levels, lossy JPEG proved to be more effective than JPEG 2000 in some cases, mainly neuro CT. More evaluation is required to assess the effect of compression on thin slice CT. We provide a table of recommended compression ratios for each modality and anatomical area investigated, to be integrated in the Canadian Association of Radiologists standard for the use of lossy compression in medical imaging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1.
Fig 2.
Fig 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bak P: Will the use of irreversible compression become a standard of practice? SCAR News 18(1):10, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brislawn CM, Quirk MD: Image compression with the JPEG-2000 standard. In: Driggers RD Ed. Encyclopedia of Optical Engineering. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2003, pp. 780–785

    Google Scholar 

  3. Iyriboz TA, Zukoski MJ, Hopper KD, Stagg PL: A comparison of Wavelet and JPEG lossy compression methods applied to medical images. J Digital Imaging 12(2) suppl 1:14–17, 1999

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Source CAR (Canadian Association of Radiologists) Annual meeting, September 2005, Lake Louise, Alberta, Canada

  5. Slone RM: Assessment of visually lossless irreversible image compression: Comparison of three methods by using an image-comparison workstation. Radiology (215):543–553, 2000

  6. Krupinski EA, Johnson J, Roehrig H, Nafziger J, Fan J, Lubin J: Use of a human visual system model to predict observer performance with CRT vs LCD display of images. J Digit Imaging 17(40):258–263, 2004, Dec

    Google Scholar 

  7. Foos DH, Muka E, Slone RM, Erickson BJ, Flynn MJ, Clunie DA, Hildebrand L, Kohm K, Young S: JPEG 2000 compression of medical imagery. Med Imag Proc SPIE 3980:85–96, 2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Finnis K: A Review and Comparison of Medical Image Compression. Study Report 2004; Atamai Inc, Calgary, Alberta

  9. ACR Technical Standard for Electronic Practice of Medical Imaging ed. American College of Radiology; 2007 (Res 13). http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/guidelines/med_phys/electronic_practice.aspx

  10. Gailly J. L. Introduction to JPEG, Compression FAQ Part 2, March 1999 www.faqs.org/faqs/jpeg-faq/part2/

  11. Christopoulos C, Skodras A, Ebrahimi T: The JPEG 2000 still image coding system: an overview. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 46(4):1103–1127, 2000, Nov

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Erickson BJ: Irreversible compression of medical images. J Digit Imaging (15):5–14, 2002

  13. Anastassopoulos GK, Skodras AN: JPEG2000 ROI “Coding in Medical Imaging Applications”, Proc. 2nd LASTED Int. Conf. On Visualisation, Imaging and Image Processing (VIIP2002), pp. 783–788, Malaga, Spain, 9–12 Sep 2002

  14. Erickson BJ, Manduca A, Palisson P, Persons KR, Earnest F, Savcenko V, Hangiandreou NJ: Wavelet compression of medical images. Radiology 206:599–607, 1998

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Obuchowski NA: Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology. Radiology 299:3–8, 2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Koff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koff, D., Bak, P., Brownrigg, P. et al. Pan-Canadian Evaluation of Irreversible Compression Ratios (“Lossy” Compression) for Development of National Guidelines. J Digit Imaging 22, 569–578 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-008-9139-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-008-9139-7

Key words

Navigation