Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Experience with Importation of Electronic Images into the Medical Record from Physical Media

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to describe a system we developed for importing images on compact discs (CDs) from external imaging departments into our clinical image viewing system, and to report on key metrics regarding veracity of information seen on the CDs. We recommend careful attention to the process of CD importation because of the error rate we have seen. We developed a system and process for importing images on CD into our EMR. The importation system scans the CD for digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) images, and collects all patient information seen. That information is presented to the patient for verification. Once validated, the image data is copied into our clinical viewing system. The importation system includes facilities for collecting instances of incorrect data. About 90% of images are now exchanged between our healthcare enterprise and other entities via CD. Data for the wrong patient (e.g., the wrong CD) is seen in about 0.1% of cases, and a similar number of CDs have data for more than one patient on the CD(s) the patient bring to our facility. Most data are now exchanged via DICOM files. DICOM images burned onto CD media are now commonly used for image exchange. However, applications to import DICOM images are not enough. One must implement a process to assure high confidence that the data imported belongs to the patient you are importing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chan L, et al: PACS in private practice—Effect on profits and productivity. J Digit Imaging 15(Suppl 1):131–6, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fleishon H, Bhargavan M, Meghea C: Radiologists’ reading times using PACS and using films: one practice’s experience. Acad Radiol 13(4):453–60, 2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mendelson D, et al: Image exchange: IHE and the evolution of image sharing. Radiographics 28:1817–1833, 2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Committee, DS: Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Part 10: Media Storage and File Format for Media Interchange, in DICOM. 2004, National Electrical Manufacturers Association: Rosslyn, VA

  5. Erickson BJ, Ryan WJ, Gehring DG: Functional requirements of a desktop clinical image display application. J Digit Imaging 14(2 Suppl 1):149–52, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005, Congress, Editor. 2005: http://www.pso.ahrq.gov/statute/pl109-41.htm

  7. Committee, IS: Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE). [cited 2010 Feb 12, 2010]

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA

    Bradley J. Erickson

Authors
  1. Bradley J. Erickson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley J. Erickson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erickson, B.J. Experience with Importation of Electronic Images into the Medical Record from Physical Media. J Digit Imaging 24, 694–699 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-011-9364-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-011-9364-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation