Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic Significance of Immunohistochemically Localized Biomarkers in Stage II and Stage III Breast Cancer: A Multivariate Analysis

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The aim was to investigate the expression of a panel of biomarkers such as prolactin (PRL), p53, Bcl-2, c-erb B2, Ki-67, CD44, and factor VIII-related antigen (FVIII-RA) in primary tumors of stage II and stage III breast cancer and its correlation with disease prognostication.

Methods: The streptavidin-biotin peroxidase complex technique was used for the detection of these antigens. Cytoplasmic staining pattern was observed for PRL, Bcl-2, and Ki-67. Staining pattern for p53 was nuclear. Membranous and/or cytoplasmic staining was noted for c-erb B2 and CD44. Microvessel staining was noted for FVIII-RA.

Results: Of the 93 primary breast tumors analyzed, positivity for PRL was noted in 82%, for p53 in 56%, for Bcl-2 in 73%, for c-erb B2 in 68%, and for Ki-67 and CD44 in 78% each. The microvessel count (MVC) for FVIII-RA ranged from 0.0 to 29.0, with a median of 6.0, which was used as a cutoff. MVC $ 6.0 was noted in 51% of breast tumors. With increasing tumor size, the higher frequency of positivity of MVC $ 6.0 (P 5 .0001), CD44 (P 5 .001), PRL (P 5 .002), and c-erb B2 (P 5 .008), and higher frequency of Bcl-2 negativity (P 5 .033), was noted. In stage III patients, a higher positivity of the following biomarkers was noted, compared with stage II patients: MVC $ 6.0 (P 5 .0004), PRL (P 5 .0002), c-erb B2 (P 5 .001), and CD44 (P 5 .005). Further, Bcl-2 positivity was significantly lower in patients with stage III disease compared with those with stage II disease (P 5 .024). In patients with nodal involvement, the frequency of c-erb B2 (P 5 .006), MVC $ 6.0 (P 5 .011), and PRL (P 5 .032) was higher than in those without nodal involvement. Moreover, in these patients, with the increase in the number of involved lymph nodes, there was a significant increase in frequency of CD441 (P 5 .0004) and PRL1 (P 5 .013) tumors. Abnormal expression of one biomarker was seen in 7% of tumors, of two biomarkers in 4%, of three in 15%, of four in 19%, of five in 28%, of six in 20%, and of all seven biomarkers in 7% of tumors. The frequency of an increasing number of biomarkers coexpressed was higher in stage III patients compared with stage II patients (P 5 .00003). In the total number of patients (n 5 93), tumors with Bcl-2 negativity (P 5 .00001), MVC $ 6.0 (P 5 .001), PRL positivity (P 5 .02), and CD44 positivity (P 5 .034) had a significantly poorer overall survival (OS) compared with their respective counterparts. In stage II patients (n 5 40), only p53 expression was significantly associated with reduced relapse-free survival (P 5 .009) and OS (P 5 .040). In multivariate analysis, p53 expression was an independent prognostic factor that influenced relapse-free survival (P 5 .034) of stage II breast cancer patients. However, it failed to attain statistical significance for OS. In stage III patients (n 5 53), tumors with Bcl-2 negativity (P 5 .0005) and MVC $ 6.0 (P 5 .039) had a significantly poorer OS compared with their respective counterparts. In multivariate analysis of stage III patients, Bcl-2 was the only independent prognostic factor (P 5 .001) for predicting OS. There was a significant association between coexpression of the biomarkers and OS (P 5 .001). The OS rates decreased with the increase in number of abnormally expressed biomarkers.

Conclusions: p53 expression in primary tumors was an independent prognostic factor that influenced relapse-free survival in patients with stage II disease. In stage III patients, lack of Bcl-2 expression was independently associated with a poor prognosis and, thus, may be an indicator of aggressive phenotype.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Gullick WJ, Love SB, Wright C, et al. c-erbB-2 protein overexpression in breast cancer is a risk factor in patients with involved and uninvolved lymph nodes. Br J Cancer 1991;63:434–438.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gasparini G, Gullick WJ, Bevilacqua P, et al. Human breast cancer: prognostic significance of the c-erbB-2 oncoprotein compared with epidermal growth factor receptor, DNA ploidy, and conventional pathologic features. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:686–695.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elledge RM, Allred DC. The p53 tumor suppressor gene in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1994;32:39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sierra A, Lloveras B, Castellsague X, Moreno L, Garcia-Ramirez M, Fabra A. Bcl-2 expression is associated with lymph node metastasis in human ductal breast carcinoma. Int J Cancer 1995; 60:54–60.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaufmann M, Heider K-H, Sinn H-P, von Minckwitz G, Ponta H, Herrlich P. CD44 variant exon epitopes in primary breast cancer and length of survival. Lancet 1995;345:615–619.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Folkman J. What is the evidence that tumors are angiogenesis dependent? J Natl Cancer Inst 1990;82:4–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weidner N. Tumor angiogenesis: review of current applications in tumor prognostication. Semin Diagn Pathol 1993;10:302–313.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fidler IJ, Ellis LM. The implications of angiogenesis for the biology and therapy of breast cancer metastasis. Cell 1994;79: 185–188.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Weikel W, Beck T, Mitze M, Knapstein PG. Immunohistochemical evaluation of growth fractions in human breast cancers using monoclonal antibody Ki-67. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1991;18: 149–154.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bhatavdekar JM, Giri DD, Shah NG, et al. Prolactin in advanced breast cancer: an Indian experience. Breast Dis 1990;3:199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bhatavdekar JM, Shah NG, Balar DB, et al. Plasma prolactin as an indicator of disease progression in advanced breast cancer. Cancer 1990;65:2028–2032.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Patel DD, Bhatavdekar JM, Chikhlikar PR, et al. Node negative breast carcinoma: hyperprolactinemia and/or overexpression of p53 as an independent predictor of poor prognosis compared to newer and established prognosticators. J Surg Oncol 1996;62:86–92.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bhatavdekar JM, Patel DD, Shah NG, et al. Role of prolactin as a local growth promoter in patients with breast cancer: GCRI experience. Eur J Surg Oncol 2000. (In press).

  14. UICC TNM classification of malignant tumors. Breast (ICD-O THE-174). In: Seller AH, ed. UICC Technical Report Series,vol. 51 . 1st edn. Geneva, Switzerland, 1980, p 7.

  15. Bloom HJG, Richardson WW. Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer. Br J Cancer 1957;11:359–377.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bhatavdekar JM, Patel DD, Chikhlikar PR, et al. Overexpression of CD44: a useful independent predictor of prognosis in patients with colorectal carcinomas. Ann Surg Oncol 1998;5:495–501.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Norusis MJ. SPSS (SPSS for Windows: Base System User’s Guide, Release 6.0). Chicago: SPSS Inc., 1993.

  18. McGuire WL, Tandon AK, Allred DC, Chamness GC, Clark GM. How to use prognostic factors in axillary node-negative breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990;82:1006–1015.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bland KI, Konstadoulakis MM, Vezeridis MP, Wanebo HJ. Oncogene protein co-expression: value of Ha-ras, c-myc, c-fos, and p53 as prognostic discriminants for breast carcinoma. Ann Surg 1995;221:706–720.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Han S, Yun I-J, Noh D-Y, Choe K-J, Song S-Y, Chi JG. Abnormal expression of four novel molecular marker represents a highly aggressive phenotype in breast cancer: immunohistochemical assay of p53, nm23, erbB-2, and cathepsin D protein. J Surg Oncol 1997;65:22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ostrowski JL, Sawan A, Henry L, et al. p53 expression in human breast cancer related to survival and prognostic factors: an immunohistochemical study. J Pathol 1991;164:75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gasparini G, Weidner N, Bevilacqua P, et al. Tumor microvessel density, p53 expression, tumor size, and peritumoral lymphatic vessel invasion are relevant prognostic markers in node-negative breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:454–466.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Elledge RM, Fuqua SAW, Clark GM, Pujol P, Allred DC. The role and prognostic significance of p53 gene alterations in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1993;27:95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Haldar S, Negrini M, Monne M, Sabbioni S, Croce CM. Downregulation of bcl-2 by p53 in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 1994;54:2095–2097.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis. In: Mendelsohn J, Howley PM, Israel MA, Liotta LA, eds. The Molecular Basis of Cancer. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1995:206–232.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hartmann LC, Ingle JN, Wold LE, et al. Prognostic value of c-erbB2 overexpression in axillary lymph node positive breast cancer: results from a randomized adjuvant treatment protocol. Cancer 1994;74:2956–2963.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rosen PP, Lesser ML, Arroyo CD, Cranor M, Borgen P, Norton L. Immunohistochemical detection of HER2/neu in patients with axillary lymph node negative breast carcinoma: a study of epidemiologic risk factors, histologic features, and prognosis. Cancer 1995;75:1320–1326.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wintzer H-O, Zipfel I, Schulte-Monting J, Hellerich U, von Kleist S. Ki-67 immunostaining in human breast tumors and its relationship to prognosis. Cancer 1991;67:421–428.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Locker AP, Birrell K, Bell JA, et al. Ki67 immunoreactivity in breast carcinoma: relationships to prognostic variables and short term survival. Eur J Surg Oncol 1992;18:224–229.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gasparini G, Boracchi P, Verderio P, Bevilacqua P. Cell kinetics in human breast cancer: comparison between the prognostic value of the cytofluorimetric S-phase fraction and that of the antibodies to Ki-67 and PCNA antigens detected by immunocytochemistry. Int J Cancer 1994;57:822–829.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neelam G. Shah PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhatavdekar, J.M., Patel, D.D., Shah, N.G. et al. Prognostic Significance of Immunohistochemically Localized Biomarkers in Stage II and Stage III Breast Cancer: A Multivariate Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 7, 305–311 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-000-0305-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10434-000-0305-5

Key Words:

Navigation