Skip to main content
Log in

Minimally invasive assessment of tumor angiogenesis by fine needle aspiration and flow cytometry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Angiogenesis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of a new, less invasive, and more rapidly implemented method of quantifying endothelial cell density in tumors could facilitate experimental and clinical studies of angiogenesis. Therefore, we evaluated the utility of tumor fine needle aspiration (FNA) coupled with flow cytometry for assessment of tumor angiogenesis. Samples were obtained from cutaneous tumors of mice using FNA, then immunostained and assessed by flow cytometry to determine the number of CD31+ endothelial cells. Results of the FNA/flow cytometry technique were compared with quantification of tumor microvessel density using immunohistochemistry. The ability of the FNA/cytometry technique to quantify the effects of anti-angiogenic therapy and to monitor changes in tumor angiogenesis over time in individual tumors was also determined. We found that endothelial cell percentages determined in tumor tissue aspirates by flow cytometry correlated well with the percentages of endothelial cells determined in whole tumor digests by flow cytometry and with tumor microvessel density measurements by immunohistochemistry. Moreover, we found that repeated FNA sampling of tumors did not induce endothelial cell changes. Interestingly, by employing repeated FNA sampling of the same tumors we were able to observe a sudden and marked decline in tumor angiogenesis triggered when tumors reached a certain size. Thus, we conclude that the FNA/flow cytometry technique is an efficient, reproducible, and relatively non-invasive method of rapidly assessing tumor angiogenesis, which could be readily applied to evaluation of tumor angiogenesis in clinical settings in humans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bouck N, Stellmach V, Hsu SC (1996) How tumors become angiogenic. Adv Cancer Res 69:135–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Folkman J (1975) Tumor angiogenesis: a possible control point in tumor growth. Ann Intern Med 82:96–100

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2000) The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100:57–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Staton CA, Reed MW, Brown NJ (2009) A critical analysis of current in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis assays. Int J Exp Pathol 90:195–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vermeulen PB, Gasparini G, Fox SB et al (1996) Quantification of angiogenesis in solid human tumours: an international consensus on the methodology and criteria of evaluation. Eur J Cancer 32A:2474–2484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cai W, Niu G, Chen X (2008) Imaging of integrins as biomarkers for tumor angiogenesis. Curr Pharm Des 14:2943–2973

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Charnley N, Donaldson S, Price P (2009) Imaging angiogenesis. Methods Mol Biol 467:25–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pearlman JD, Laham RJ, Post M et al (2002) Medical imaging techniques in the evaluation of strategies for therapeutic angiogenesis. Curr Pharm Des 8:1467–1496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baeten CI, Wagstaff J, Verhoeven IC et al (2002) Flow cytometric quantification of tumour endothelial cells; an objective alternative for microvessel density assessment. Br J Cancer 87:344–347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gustafson DL, Bradshaw-Pierce EL, Merz AL et al (2006) Tissue distribution and metabolism of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD6474 (Zactima) in tumor-bearing nude mice following oral dosing. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 318:872–880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Troiani T, Serkova NJ, Gustafson DL et al (2007) Investigation of two dosing schedules of vandetanib (ZD6474), an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor signaling, in combination with irinotecan in a human colon cancer xenograft model. Clin Cancer Res 13:6450–6458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hermiston ML, Xu Z, Weiss A (2003) CD45: a critical regulator of signaling thresholds in immune cells. Annu Rev Immunol 21:107–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hermiston ML, Zikherman J, Zhu JW (2009) CD45, CD148, and Lyp/Pep: critical phosphatases regulating Src family kinase signaling networks in immune cells. Immunol Rev 228:288–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas ML, Lefrancois L (1988) Differential expression of the leucocyte-common antigen family. Immunol Today 9:320–326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wautier JL, Wautier MP (2001) Blood cells and vascular cell interactions in diabetes. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 25:49–53

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jackson DE (2003) The unfolding tale of PECAM-1. FEBS Lett 540:7–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim SJ, Kim JS, Papadopoulos J et al (2009) Circulating monocytes expressing CD31: implications for acute and chronic angiogenesis. Am J Pathol 174:1972–1980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Drevs J, Konerding MA, Wolloscheck T et al (2004) The VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, ZD6474, inhibits angiogenesis and affects microvascular architecture within an orthotopically implanted renal cell carcinoma. Angiogenesis 7:347–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McCarty MF, Wey J, Stoeltzing O et al (2004) ZD6474, a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with additional activity against epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, inhibits orthotopic growth and angiogenesis of gastric cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 3:1041–1048

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wedge SR, Ogilvie DJ, Dukes M et al (2002) ZD6474 inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor signaling, angiogenesis, and tumor growth following oral administration. Cancer Res 62:4645–4655

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Daniel Gustafson and AstraZeneca for providing the ZD6474 used for these experiments. These studies were supported in part by the Harbers Foundation and by a grant from the Colorado State University Cancer Supercluster.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven W. Dow.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10456_2010_9182_MOESM1_ESM.jpg

Supplementary Figure 1: Computer aided analysis of serially sacrificed mice reveals angiogenic collapse of the tumor. Syngeneic mice challenged with MCA-205 tumors (n = 3–4 mice per time point) were serially sacrificed and tumors collected for immunohistochemical determination of microvessel density. Analysis of MVD revealed similar dynamics of CD31+ cells to those observed by FNA (A). Representative immunohistochemical sections immunostained for CD31 are shown (B) (JPEG 11412 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sottnik, J.L., Guth, A.M., Mitchell, L.A. et al. Minimally invasive assessment of tumor angiogenesis by fine needle aspiration and flow cytometry. Angiogenesis 13, 251–258 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-010-9182-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-010-9182-0

Keywords

Navigation