Abstract
Problem statement and background Feedback is essential to learning and practice improvement, yet challenging both to provide and receive. The purpose of this paper was to explore reflective processes which physicians described as they considered their assessment feedback and the perceived utility of that reflective process. Methods This is a qualitative study using principles of grounded theory. We conducted interviews with 28 family physicians participating in a multi-source feedback program and receiving scores across the spectrum from high to low. Results Feedback, especially negative feedback, evoked reflective responses. Reflection seemed to be the process through which feedback was or was not assimilated and appeared integral to decisions to accept and use the feedback. Facilitated reflection upon feedback was viewed as a positive influence for assimilation and acceptance. Conclusions Receiving feedback inconsistent with self-perceptions stimulated physicians’ reflective processes. The process of reflection appeared instrumental to feedback acceptance and use, suggesting that reflection may be an important educational focus in the formative assessment and feedback process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Blank, L. L., & Cohen, J. J. (2007). Feedback improves performance: Validating a first principle. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161, 103–104. doi:10.1001/archpedi.161.1.103.
Boehler, M. L., Rogers, D. A., Schwind, C. J., Mayforth, R., Quin, J., Williams, R. G., et al. (2006). An investigation of medical student reactions to feedback: A randomised controlled trial. Medical Education, 40, 746–749. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02503.x.
Boud, D., Keough, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Kogan Page.
Boud, D., & Walker, D. (2002). Promoting reflection in professional courses: The challenge of context. In R. Harrison, F. Reeve, A. Hanson, & J. Clark (Eds.), Support lifelong learning (Vol. I, pp. 91–110). New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Branch, W. T., & Paranjape, A. (2002). Feedback and reflection: Teaching methods for clinical settings. Academic Medicine, 77(12), 1185–1188. doi:10.1097/00001888-200212000-00005.
Carr, S. (2006). The Foundation Programme assessment tools: An opportunity to enhance feedback to trainees? Postgraduate Medical Journal, 82, 576–579. doi:10.1136/pgmj.2005.042366.
Crabtree, B., & Miller, W. (Eds.). (1999). Making sense of qualitative research. London: Sage.
DeNisi, A. S., & Kluger, A. N. (2000). Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved? Academy of Management Executive, 14, 129–139.
Epstein, R. M., & Hundert, E. M. (2002). Defining and assessing professional competence. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(2), 226–235. doi:10.1001/jama.287.2.226.
Eva, K. W., & Regher, G. (2005). Self-assessment in the health professions: A reformulation and research agenda. Academic Medicine, 80(10), S46–S54. doi:10.1097/00001888-200510001-00015.
Evans, R., Elwyn, G., & Edwards, A. (2004). Review of instruments for peer assessment of physicians. Journal of the American Medical Association, 328, 1240.
Gielen, S., Dochy, F., & Dierick, S. (2003). Evaluating the consequential validity of new modes of assessment the influence of assessment on learning, including pre-, post-, and true assessment effects. In M. Sigers (Ed.), Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (pp. 37–54). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Goodstone, M. S., & Diamante, T. (1998). Organizational use of therapeutic change: Strengthening multisource feedback systems through interdisciplinary coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 50(3), 152–163. doi:10.1037/1061-4087.50.3.152.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33–49. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(94) 00012-U.
Kjaer, N. K., Maagaard, R., & Wied, S. (2006). Using an online portfolio in postgraduate training. Medical Teacher, 28(8), 708–712. doi:10.1080/01421590601047672.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Mamede, S., & Schmidt, H. (2004). The structure of reflective practice in medicine. Medical Education, 38, 1302–1306. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01917.x.
Mann, K. V., Gordon, J., & MacLeod, A. (2007). Reflective practice in health professions education: A review of the literature. Advances in Health Science Education. doi:10.1007/s10459-007-9090-2.
Menachery, E. P., Knight, A. M., Kolodner, K., & Wright, S. M. (2006). Physician characteristics associated with proficiency in feedback skills. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21, 440–446. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00424.x.
Moon, J. (1999). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
Moon, J. (2004). Using reflective learning to improve the impact of short courses and workshops. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 24(1), 4–11. doi:10.1002/chp. 1340240103.
NSPAR. (2006). Nova Scotia Physician Achievement Review: Sample questionnaires. Website: http://www.nspar.ca/about.htm (Accessed April 18, 2008)
Prins, F. J., Sluijsmans, D. M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Feedback for general practitioners in training: Quality, styles, and preferences. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11(3), 289–303. doi:10.1007/s10459-005-3250-z.
Rice, P. L., & Ezzy, D. (2000). Qualitative research methods. Victoria, Australia: Oxford University Press.
Richardson, B. K. (2004). Feedback. Academic Emergency Medicine, 11, 1283–12835. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2004.tb01913.x.
Sargeant, J. (2006). Multi-source feedback for physician learning and change. Halifax, Canada: Halcraft Printers Inc. (Doctoral dissertation, Maastricht University, NL).
Sargeant, J., Mann, K., & Ferrier, S. (2005). Exploring family physicians’ reaction to MSF performance assessment: Perceptions of credibility and usefulness. Medical Education, 39, 497–504. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02124.x.
Sargeant, J., Mann, K., Ferrier, S., Langille, D., Muirhead, P., & Sinclair, D. (2003). Responses of rural family physicians and their colleague and coworker raters to multi-source feedback: A pilot study. Academic Medicine, 78(10), S42–S44. doi:10.1097/00001888-200310001-00014.
Sargeant, J., Mann, K., Sinclair, D., Ferrier, S., Muirhead, P., van der Vleuten, C., et al. (2006a). Learning in practice: Experiences and perceptions of high-scoring physicians. Academic Medicine, 81(7), 655–660. doi:10.1097/01.ACM.0000232422.81299.b7.
Sargeant, J., Mann, K., Sinclair, D., van der Vleuten, C., & Metsemakers, J. (2006b). Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Advances in Health Science Education. doi:10.1007/s104569-006-9039-x
Sargeant, J., Mann, K., Sinclair, D., van der Vleuten, C., & Metsemakers, J. (2007). Challenges in multi-source feedback: Intended and unintended outcomes. Medical Education, 41, 583–591. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02769.x.
Sargeant, J., Mann, K., van der Vleuten, C., & Metsemakers, J. (2008). “Directed” self-assessment: practice and feedback within a social context. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 28(1), 64–73.
Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Smither, J., London, M., & Reilly, R. R. (2005). Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta- analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 58, 33–66. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.514_1.x.
Strauss, A. C., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Second edition: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
van den Boss, K., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, A. M. (1997). Procedural and distributive justice: What is fair depends more on what comes first than on what comes next. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 95–104. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.95.
van der Vleuten, C., & Schuwirth, L. W. T. (2005). Assessing professional competence: From methods to programmes. Medical Education, 39, 309–317. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02094.x.
Westberg, J., & Jason, H. (2001). Fostering reflection and providing feedback: Helping others learn from experience. New York: Springer Publications.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the support of the Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation, the Medical Council of Canada and the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Nova Scotia for this research, and the assistance of our research associate, Tanya Hill, in preparing the final draft of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sargeant, J.M., Mann, K.V., van der Vleuten, C.P. et al. Reflection: a link between receiving and using assessment feedback. Adv in Health Sci Educ 14, 399–410 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-008-9124-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-008-9124-4