References
Colliver, J. A., Kucera, K., & Verhulst, S. J. (2008). Meta-analysis of quasi-experimental research: Are systematic narrative reviews indicated? Medical Education, 42, 858–865.
Cook, D. A. (2005). The research we still are not doing: An agenda for the study of computer-based learning. Academic Medicine, 80, 541–548.
Cook, D. J., Mulrow, C. D., & Haynes, R. B. (1997). Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine, 126(5), 376–380.
Côté, L., & Turgeon, J. (2005). Appraising qualitative research articles in medicine and medical education. Medical Teacher, 27, 71–75.
Devers, K. J. (1999). How will we know “good” qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research. Health Services Research, 34(5 part 2), 1153–1188.
Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215–229.
Ercikan, K., & Roth, W.-M. (2006). What good is polarizing research into qualitative and quantitative? Educational Researcher, 35(5), 14–23.
Eva, K. W. (2008). On the limits of systematicity. Medical Education, 42, 852–853.
Eva, K. W., Neville, A. J., & Norman, G. R. (1998). Exploring the etiology of content specificity: Factors influencing analogic transfer and problem solving. Academic Medicine, 73(10 Suppl), S1–S5.
Eva, K. W., & Regehr, G. (2005). Self-assessment in the health professions: A reformulation and research agenda. Academic Medicine, 80(10 Suppl), S46–S54.
Malterud, K. (2001). Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, guidelines. Lancet, 358, 483–488.
Moher, D., Cook, D. J., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D., & Stroup, D. F. (1999). Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses. Lancet, 354, 1896–1900.
Montori, V. M., Smieja, M., & Guyatt, G. H. (2000). Publication bias: A brief review for clinicians. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 75, 1284–1288.
Norman, G. R., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 67, 557–565.
Stroup, D. F., Berlin, J. A., Morton, S. C., Olkin, I., Williamson, G. D., Rennie, D., et al. (2000). Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. JAMA, 283, 2008–2012.
Williams, R. G., Klamen, D. A., & McGaghie, W. C. (2003). Cognitive, social, and environmental sources of bias in clinical performance ratings. Teaching & Learning in Medicine, 15, 270–292.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cook, D.A. Narrowing the focus and broadening horizons: Complementary roles for systematic and nonsystematic reviews. Adv in Health Sci Educ 13, 391–395 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-008-9140-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-008-9140-4