Abstract
A growing body of research provides strong evidence for the effectiveness of programs to improve the primary care of depression based on the chronic care model. At the same time these changes are difficult to sustain in their original research settings and more difficult to widely disseminate in primary care practice. The RESPECT-Depression trial tested an implementation and dissemination strategy by working through five community-based health care organizations (HCOs) to implement the Three Component Model (TCM) for improving depression care. This report describes the results of extensive interviews of project principals, health care program managers, depression care managers, and practicing primary care clinicians to understand the characteristics of organizations and the intervention components that were associated with implementation and dissemination of the TCM. In two of the organizations all 29 participating practices continued the TCM, while all 31 practices from the other three organizations did not. Successful continuation and dissemination appeared to be related to a broadly shared vision and commitment among all levels of the organization, clearly articulated by clinical leadership, for pursuing a systematic change strategy to improve chronic care that included, but extended beyond, depression, independent of clear evidence for cost-effectiveness of expanding depression management. Factors associated with inability to sustain the TCM included lack of a shared change strategy throughout the organization and inability to rationalize an economic model of depression care.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bate SRGMH (2001). Report on the “Breakthrough” collaborative approach to quality and service improvement within four regions of the NHS. A research based investigation of the orthopaedic services collaborative within the Eastern, South & West, South East, and Trent regions. Birmingham: Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham.
Chin, M. H., Cook, S., & Drum, M. L. et al. (2004). Improving diabetes care in midwest community health centers with a health disparities collaborative. Diabetes Care, 27, 2–8.
Dietrich, A. J., Oxman, T. E., & Williams, J. W. Jr. et al. (2004). Going to scale: re-engineering systems for primary care treatment of depression. Annals of Family Medicine, 2(4), 301–304.
Dietrich, A. J., Oxman, T. E., & Williams, J. W. Jr. et al. (2004). Re-engineering systems for the treatment of depression in primary care: cluster randomised controlled trial. see comment. BMJ, 329(7466), 602.
Hunkeler, E. M., Meresman, J. F., & Hargreaves, W. A. et al. (2000). Efficacy of nurse telehealth care and peer support in augmenting treatment of depression in primary care. [letter; comment]. [see comments]. Archives of Family Medicine, 9(8), 700–708.
Katon, W., Robinson, P., & Von Korff, M. et al. (1996). A multifaceted intervention to improve treatment of depression in primary care. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53(10), 924–932.
Katon, W., Von Korff, M., & Lin, E. et al. (1997). Collaborative management to achieve depression treatment guidelines. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 58(Suppl 1), 20–23.
Katzelnick, D. J., Simon, G. E., & Pearson, S. D. et al. (2000). Randomized trial of a depression management program in high utilizers of medical care. Archives of Family Medicine, 9, 345–351.
Katzelnick, D. J., Von, K. M., Chung, H., Provost, L. P., & Wagner, E. H. (2005). Applying depression-specific change concepts in a collaborative breakthrough series. Joint Commission Journal on Quality & Patient Safety, 31(7), 386–397.
Kilo, C. M. (1999). Improving care through collaboration. Pediatrics, 103(Suppl E), 384–393.
Kroenke, K., & Spitzer, R. L. (2002). The PHQ-9: a new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatric Annals, 32, 1–7.
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613.
Meredith, L. S. M. P., Pearson, M., Wu, S. Y., Joyce, G., Straus, J. B., Ryan, G., Keeler, E., & Unutzer, J. (2006). Implementation and maintenance of quality improvement for treating depression in primary care. Psychiatric Services, 57, 48–55.
Ovretveit, J. (2002). How to run an effective improvement collaborative. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 15, 192–196.
Quenan, L., Remington, P., Gohre, F., & Zapp, P. (2000). The Wisconsin collaborative diabetes quality improvement project. Wisconsin Medical Journal, 99(3), 48–52.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
Rost, K., Nutting, P., Smith, J., Werner, J., & Duan, N. (2001). Improving depression outcomes in community primary care practice: a randomized trial of the quEST intervention. Quality Enhancement by Strategic Teaming. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(3), 143–149.
Rost, K., Nutting, P., Smith, J. L., Elliott, C. E., & Dickinson, M. (2002). Managing depression as a chronic disease: a randomised trial of ongoing treatment in primary care [comment]. BMJ, 325(7370), 934.
Schulberg, H. C., Block, M. R., & Madonia, M. J. et al. (1996). Treating major depression in primary care practice. Eight-month clinical outcomes. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53(10), 913–919.
Simon, G. E., Von Korff, M., Rutter, C., & Wagner, E. (2000). Randomised trial of monitoring, feedback, and management of care by telephone to improve treatment of depression in primary care. [see comments]. BMJ, 320(7234), 550–554.
Unutzer, J., Katon, W., & Callahan, C. M. et al. (2002). Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 288(22), 2836–2845.
Wells, K. B., Sherbourne, C., & Schoenbaum, M. et al. (2000). Impact of disseminating quality improvement programs for depression in managed primary care: a randomized controlled trial. [erratum appears in JAMA 2000 Jun 28;283(24):3204]. JAMA, 283(2), 212–220.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, through the Initiative on Depression and Primary Care. The authors would like to thank the many program managers and clinicians who shared their experiences and perspectives on primary care of depression without whose insights this work would not have been possible.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nutting, P.A., Gallagher, K.M., Riley, K. et al. Implementing a Depression Improvement Intervention in Five Health Care Organizations: Experience from the RESPECT-Depression Trial. Adm Policy Ment Health 34, 127–137 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-006-0090-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-006-0090-y