Skip to main content
Log in

Effectiveness of the postponed isolation (post-frozen isolation) method for PCR-quality Sarcoptes mite gDNA

  • Published:
Experimental and Applied Acarology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess whether individual Sarcoptes mites collected from frozen skin (‘postponed isolation’ method) are suitable sources of PCR-quality genomic DNA, and to test the effectiveness of this method in comparison with the ‘direct isolation’ method, often used through force of habit. Hundreds of single Sarcoptes scabiei samples, resulting from direct (live) or postponed (post-frozen) isolation, were tested using a ~450 bp product (ITS-2) and multi-locus 10× genotyping with microsatellite markers. No statistical difference in yield of soluble DNA was found between the two isolation methods. Nevertheless, 19% of the reactions were classified as failed preparations in the direct isolation method, whereas the rate of unsuccessful reactions was 34% in the postponed isolation method. Consequently, post-frozen isolation is suitable and recommendable for Sarcoptes mite gDNA preparation, particularly when performing a balancing act among safety, practicability and profitability. These results have implications for mite collection for DNA extraction, and hence the needed wider leap of Sarcoptes into the genetic era.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berrilli F, D’Amelio S, Rossi L (2002) Ribosomal and mitochondrial DNA sequence variation in Sarcoptes mites from different hosts and geographical regions. Parasitol Res 88:772–777

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein S, Mörner T, Samuel WM (2001) Sarcoptes scabiei and sarcoptic mange. In: Samuel WM, Pybus MJ, Kocan AA (eds) Parasitic diseases of wild mammals, 2nd edn. Manson Publishing/The Veterinary Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brimer L, Henriksen SA, Gyrd-Hansen N, Rasmussen F (1993) Evaluation of an in vitro method for acaricidal effect. Activity of parathion, phosmet and phoxim against Sarcoptes scabiei. Vet Parasitol 51:123–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dagleish MP, Ali Q, Powell RK, Butz D, Woodford MH (2007) Fatal Sarcoptes scabiei infection of blue sheep (Pseudois nayaur) in Pakistan. J Wildl Dis 43(3):512–517

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fain A (1968) Étude de la variabilité de Sarcoptes scabiei avec une revisiondes Sarcoptidae. Acta Zool Pathol Antverp 47:1–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzano A, Rambozi L, Rossi L (2004) Outbreak of scabies in human beings, acquired from chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra). Vet Rec 155:568

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shanks DJ, McTier TL, Behan S, Pengo G, Genchi C, Bowman DD, Holbert MS, Smith DG, Jernigan AD, Rowan TG (2000) The efficacy of selamectin in the treatment of naturally acquired infestations of Sarcoptes scabiei on dogs. Vet Parasitol 91:269–281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheahan BJ, Hatch C (1975) A method for isolating large numbers of Sarcoptes scabiei from lesions in the ears of pigs. J Parasitol 61:350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skerratt LF, Beveridge I (1999) Human scabies of wombat origin. Aust Vet J 77:607

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skerratt LF, Campbell NJH, Murrell A, Walton S, Kemp D, Barker SC (2002) The mitochondrial 12S gene is a suitable marker of populations of Sarcoptes scabiei from wombats, dogs and humans in Australia. Parasitol Res 88:376–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smets K, Vercruysse J (2000) Evaluation of different methods for the diagnosis of scabies in swine. Vet Parasitol 90:137–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soglia D, Rasero R, Rossi L, Sartore S, Sacchi P, Maione S (2007) Microsatellites as markers for comparison among different populations of Sarcoptes scabiei. Italian J Anim Sci 7:214–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton SF, Currie BJ, Kemp DJ (1997) A DNA fingerprinting system for the ectoparasite Sarcoptes scabiei. Mol Biochem Parasitol 85:187–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walton SF, Holt DC, Currie BJ, Kemp DJ (2004) Scabies: new future for a neglected disease. Adv Parasitol 57:309–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zahler M, Essig A, Gothe R, Rinder H (1999) Molecular analyses suggest monospecificity of the genus Sarcoptes (Acari: Sarcoptidae). Int J Parasitol 29:759–766

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the people who supported the Department of Animal Production, Epidemiology and Ecology (University of Turin-Italy) with Sarcoptes samples, and RNM 118 research group (Junta de Andalucía-Spain) for supporting SA’s investigation stay in Italy. The research was supported by MURST contract year 2004, Prot. 2004078701_001 (LR).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samer Alasaad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alasaad, S., Soglia, D., Maione, S. et al. Effectiveness of the postponed isolation (post-frozen isolation) method for PCR-quality Sarcoptes mite gDNA. Exp Appl Acarol 47, 173–178 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-008-9196-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-008-9196-0

Keywords

Navigation