Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: experience with 406 cases

  • EPIDEMIOLOGY
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to determine the indications, accuracy and complications of vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) performed using ultrasonographic (US) guidance for non-palpable lesions.

Materials and methods

This was a prospective study in which results from consecutive US-guided VABB performed between January 1999 and April 2003 were subsequently compared to those from excisional biopsy or to long-term follow-up imaging.

Results

Four hundred and six lesions were submitted to VABB procedures. Out of those, 78.9% were benign, 18.8% were malignant, 1.7% was lobular neoplasia, and 0.4% was atypical duct hyperplasia. Underestimation occurred in 2.6% of the cases and false negative results in 0.6%. Sensitivity to VABB was 97%, specificity went up to 100%, negative predictive value was 99%, positive predictive value was 100%, and accuracy was 99%. Complications occurred in 9% of the patients.

Conclusion

US-guided VABB is an accurate and safe procedure. The main indication is the non-palpable suspicious breast lesions (category 4). This new technique could be a good alternative for percutaneous and surgery biopsy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Liberman L (2000) Percutaneous Imaging-guided core breast biopsy: state of the art at the millennium. AJR 174:1191–1199

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. March DE, Coughlin BF, Barham RB, Goulart RA, Klein SV, Bur ME, Frank JL, Makari-Judson G (2003) Breast masses: removal of all US evidence during biopsy by using a handheld vacuum-assisted device-initial experience. Radiology 227:549–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lattanzio V, Guerrieri AM, Giardina C (2001) Interventional breasts imaging: mammotome. Tumori 87:S10–S12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bear HD (1998) Image-guided breast biopsy: how, when, and by whom? J Surg Oncol 67:1–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fine RE, Boyd BA, Whitworth PW, Kim JA, Harness JK, Burak WE (2002) Percutaneous removal of benign breast masses using a vacuum-assisted hand-held device with ultrasound guidance. Am J Surg 184:332–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baez E, Huber A, Vetter M, Hackeloer BJ (2003) Minimal invasive complete excision of benign breast tumors using a three-dimensional ultrasound-guided mammotome vacuum device. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21:267–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Meloni GB, Dessole S, Becchere MP, Soro D, Capobianco G, Ambrosini G, Nardelli GB, Canalis GC (2001) Ultrasound-guided mammotome vacuum biopsy for the diagnosis of impalpable breast lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:520–524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Parker SH, Klaus AJ, McWey PJ, Schilling KJ, Cupples TE, Duchesne N, Guenin MA, Harness JK (2001) Sonographically guided directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy using a handheld device. AJR 177:405–408

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Simon JR, Kalbhen CL, Cooper RA, Flisak ME (2000) Accuracy and complication rates of US-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: initial results. Radiology 215:694–697

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. American College of Radiology (2003) Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), 4th ed. Reston, VA, American College of Radiology

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tavassoli FA (1999). Lobular neoplasia. In: Tavassoli FA (eds) Pathology of the breast. 2nd ed. Stamford, Appleton &Lange, pp. 373–400

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bratthauer GL, Tavassoli FA (2002) Lobular intraepithelial neoplasia: previously unexplored aspects assessed in 775 cases and their clinical implications. Virchows Arc 440:134–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Perez-Fuentes JA, Longobardi IR, Acosta VF, Marin CE, Liberman L (2001) Sonographically guided directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: preliminary experience in Venezuela. AJR 177:1459–1463

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Soo MS, Baker JA, Rosen EL (2003) Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications. AJR 180:941–948

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson AT, Henry-Tillman RS, Smith LF, Harshfield D, Korourian S, Brown H, Lane S, Colvert M, Klimberg S (2002) Percutaneous excisional breast biopsy. Am J Surg 184:550–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schoonjans JM, Brem RF (2001) Fourteen-gauge ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy of breast masses. J Ultrasound Med 20:967–972

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sperber F, Blank A, Metser U, Flusser G, Klausner JM, Lev-Chelouche D (2003) Diagnosis and treatment of breast fibroadenomas by ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy. Arch Surg 138:796–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Huber S, Wagner M, Medl M, Czembirek H (2003) Benign breast lesions: minimally invasive vacuum-assisted biopsy with 11-gauge needles patient acceptance and effect on follow-up imaging findings. Radiology 226:783–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hung WK, Lam HS, Lau Y, Chan CM, Yip AW (2001) Diagnostic accuracy of vacuum-assisted biopsy device for image-detected breast lesions. ANZ J Surg 71:457–460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Philpotts LE, Hooley RJ, Lee CH (2003) Comparison of automated versus vaccum-assisted biopsy methods for sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast. AJR 180:347–351

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pfarl G, Helbich, Riedl CC, Wagner T, Gnant M, Rudas M, Liberman L et al (2002) Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a validation study. AJR 179:1503–1507

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fine RE, Israel PZ, Walker LC, Corgan KR, Greenwald LV, Berenson JE, Boyd BA, Oliver MK, McClure T, Elberfeld J (2001) A prospective study of the removal rate of imaged breast lesions by an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy probe system. Am J Surg 182:335–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Grady I, Gorsuch H, Wilburn-Baley (2005) Ultrasound-guided,␣vaccum-assisted, percutaneous excision of breast lesions: an accurate technique in the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia. J Am Coll Surg 201:14–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Duchesne N, Côté G, Dorion A, Roy M (2001) Ultrasound-guided mammotome breast biopsies. (abstr) AJR 176(suppl):7

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lai JT, Burrowes P, MacGregor JH (2000) Vacuum-assisted large-core breast biopsy: complications and their incidence. Can Assoc Radiol J 51:232–236

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cho N, Moon WK, Cha JH, Kim SM, Kim SJ, Lee SH, Chung HK, Cho KS, Park IA, Noh DY (2005) Sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast: comparation of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy methods. Korean J Radiol 6:102–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the data manager Stefania Andrighetto and Simona Menna for their valuable work in organizing patient data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linei A. B. D. Urban.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cassano, E., Urban, L.A.B.D., Pizzamiglio, M. et al. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: experience with 406 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 102, 103–110 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9305-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9305-x

Keywords

Navigation