Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact on survival of early detection of isolated breast recurrences after the primary treatment for breast cancer: a meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose The purpose was to establish the impact on survival of early detection of a local recurrence of breast cancer as compared to late detection. Design A meta-analysis was carried out using Cochrane review manager software (RevMan version 4.2). Studies were included if women were treated for primary breast cancer without evidence of distant metastasis at primary diagnosis and if these concerned routine follow-up strategies focusing on the early detection of curable recurrences. Data regarding the risk for death were derived from each study. Multi level models were used to study heterogeneity by using MLWin. Results Thirteen studies concerning 2,263 patients were included. Early detection of breast cancer recurrences during follow-up gave a significantly better survival as compared to late detected recurrences (HR: 1.68 (95% CI: 1.48–1.91)). Survival was better when the recurrence was found by mammography instead of physical examination or in patients without symptoms as compared to those with symptoms (HR: 2.44 (95% CI: 1.78–3.35); HR: 1.56 (95% CI: 1.36–1.79), respectively). If all breast cancer recurrences would be detected earlier, that 5–8 deaths (i.e. an absolute reduction in mortality of 17–28%) would be avoided by performing routine follow-up during a 10 year-period for 1,000 breast cancer patients. Conclusion These data support the hypothesis that detection of isolated loco-regional or contra-lateral breast cancer recurrences in patients without symptoms has beneficial impact on survival of breast cancer patients when compared to late symptomatic detection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parkin DM, Fernandez LM (2006) Use of statistics to assess the global burden of breast cancer. Breast J 12(Suppl 1):S70–S80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hiramanek N (2004) Breast cancer recurrence: follow up after treatment for primary breast cancer. Postgrad Med J 80:172–176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Erikson C, Salsberg E, Forte G et al (2007) Future supply and demand for oncologists-challenges to assuring access to oncology services. J Oncol Practice 3:79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schapira DV, Urban N (1991) A minimalist policy for breast cancer surveillance. JAMA 265:380–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. De Bock GH, Bonnema J, Van Der Hage J et al (2004) Effectiveness of routine visits and routine tests in detecting isolated locoregional recurrences after treatment for early-stage invasive breast cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review. J Clin Oncol 22:4010–4018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kemperman H, Borger J, Hart A et al (1995) Prognostic factors for survival after breast conserving therapy for stage I and II breast cancer. The role of local recurrence. Eur J Cancer 31:690–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S et al (2005) Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 366:2087–2106

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Te Boekhorst DS, Peer NG, van der Sluis RF et al (2001) Periodic follow-up after breast cancer and the effect on survival. Eur J Surg 167:490–496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rutgers EJ, van Slooten EA, Kluck HM (1989) Follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer. Br J Surg 76:187–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dewar JA, Kerr GR (1985) Value of routine follow up of women treated for early carcinoma of the breast. Brit Med J (Clin Res Ed) 291:1464–1467

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ciatto S, Rosselli Del Turco M, Pacini P et al (1985) Early detection of breast cancer recurrences through periodic follow-up—is it useless? Tumori 71:325–329

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Broyn T, Froyen J (1982) Evaluation of routine follow-up after surgery for breast carcinoma. Acta Chir Scand 148:401–404

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Krengli M, Pastore G, Maffei S (1993) The importance of the follow-up in patients operated on for breast cancer. A retrospective analysis of 2,482 cases. Minerva Med 84:409–415

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pivot X, Asmar L, Hortobagyi GN et al (2000) A retrospective study of first indicators of breast cancer recurrence. Oncology 58:185–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Altman DG, Lyman GH (1998) Methodological challenges in the evaluation of prognostic factors in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 52:289–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Laupacis A, Wells G, Richardson WS et al (1994) Users’ guides to the medical literature, V: how to use an article on prognosis. JAMA 272:234–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50:1088–1101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenberg MS (2005) The file drawer problem revisited: a general weighted method for calculating fail-safe number in meta-analysis. Evolution Int J Org Evolution 59:464–468

    Google Scholar 

  19. Parmar MKB, Torri V, Stewart L (1998) Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoint. Statist Med 17:2815–2834

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ciatto S, Miccinesi G, Zappa M (2004) Prognostic impact of the early detection of metachronous contralateral breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 40:1496–1501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Breslow NE, Day NE (1980) Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume I—The analysis of case-control studies. IARC Sci Publ 32:5–338

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Soerjomataram I, Louwman MW, Ribot JG, Roukema JA, Coebergh JW (2008) An overview of prognostic factors for long-term survivors of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 107:309–330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Doyle T, Schultz DJ, Peters C et al (2001) Long-term results of local recurrence after breast conservation treatment for invasive breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51:74–80

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Imoto S, Jitsuiki Y (1998) Detection of the first recurrence during intensive follow-up of breast cancer patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol 28:597–600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kindler M, Steinhoff G (1989) Follow-up of breast cancer patients. Oncology 46:360–365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stierer M, Rosen HR (1989) Influence of early diagnosis on prognosis of recurrent breast cancer. Cancer 64:1128–1131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Orel SG, Fowble BL, Solin LJ et al (1993) Breast cancer recurrence after lumpectomy and radiation therapy for early-stage disease: prognostic significance of detection method. Radiology 188:189–194

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wagman LD, Sanders RD, Terz JJ et al (1991) The value of symptom directed evaluation in the surveillance for recurrence of carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obst 172:191–196

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Voogd AC, van Tienhoven G, Peterse HL et al (1999) Local recurrence after breast conservation therapy for early stage breast carcinoma: detection, treatment, and outcome in 266 patients. Dutch Study Group on Local Recurrence after Breast Conservation (BORST). Cancer 85:437–446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mellink W, Holland R, Hendrisks T (1991) The contribution of routine follow-up mammography to an early detection of a synchronous contralateral breast cancer. Cancer 67:1844–1848

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lash TL, Clough-Gorr K, Silliman RA (2006) Reduced mortality rate associated with annual mammograms after breast cancer therapy. Breast J 12:2–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaas R, Hart AA, Besnard AP et al (2001) Impact of mammographic interval on stage and survival after the diagnosis of contralateral breast cancer. Br J Surg 88:123–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Montgomery DA, Krupa K, Jack WJL et al (2007) Changing pattern of the detection of locoregional relapse in breast cancer: the Edinburgh experience. Brit J Cancer 96:1802–1807

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hussian ST, Gui GP, Lee KS et al (1995) Detection of loco-regional recurrence after breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy. J R Coll Surg Edinb 40:163–166

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Khatcheressian JL, Wolff AC, Smith TJ et al (2006) American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting. J Clin Oncol 24:5091–5097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Perrone MA, Musolino A, Michiara M et al (2004) Early detection of recurrences in the follow-up of primary breast cancer in an asymptomatic or symptomatic phase. Tumori 90:276–279

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tomin R, Donegan WL (1987) Screening for recurrent breast cancer–its effectiveness and prognostic value. J Clin Oncol 5:62–67

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rosselli Del Turco M, Palli D, Cariddi A et al (1994) Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer. A randomized trial. National Research Council Project on Breast Cancer follow-up. JAMA 271:1593–1597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. The GIVIO Investigators (1994) Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. A multicenter randomized controlled trial. JAMA 271:1587–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ciatto S, Ambrogetti D, Bonardi R et al (1990) Prognostic impact of early detection of contralateral primary breast cancer. Tumori 76:370–373

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. H. De Bock.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lu, W.L., Jansen, L., Post, W.J. et al. Impact on survival of early detection of isolated breast recurrences after the primary treatment for breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 114, 403–412 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-0023-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-0023-4

Keywords

Navigation