Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk of ipsilateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation have an elevated risk of breast cancer and of contralateral breast cancer. In this study, we estimate the risk of non-synchronous ipsilateral breast cancer after a diagnosis of breast cancer in BRCA carriers and evaluate the effects of various treatments on this risk. Patients were 396 women with stage I or stage II breast cancer with an intact ipsilateral breast and for whom a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation had been identified in the family. Patients were followed from the initial diagnosis of cancer until the first of ipsilateral mastectomy, ipsilateral breast cancer, death or last follow-up. The 5-year actuarial risk of ipsilateral breast cancer was 5.8% (95% CI 3.2–8.4%) and the 10-year risk was 12.9% (95% CI 8.7–17.1%). Subjects who received chemotherapy had a significantly lower risk of ipsilateral breast cancer compared to those who did not receive chemotherapy (RR 0.45; 95% CI 0.24–0.84; P = 0.01). Radiotherapy was associated with a reduced risk of ipsilateral breast cancer (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.12–0.63; P = 0.002). Oophorectomy was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of ipsilateral breast cancer (RR 0.33; 95% CI; 0.13–0.81; P = 0.02). On average, following a diagnosis of breast cancer, the annual risk of ipsilateral breast cancer risk in BRCA mutation carriers is 1.2% per year. For women treated with chemotherapy, radiation therapy or oophorectomy the risk is low, compared to women who did not receive any of these treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S (2003) Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 72:1117–1130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen S, Parmigiani G (2007) Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance. J Clin Oncol 25:1329–1333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Verhoog LC, Brekelmans CT, Seynaeve C et al (1998) Survival and tumour characteristics of breast-cancer patients with germline mutations of BRCA1. Lancet 351:316–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Robson M, Gilewski T, Haas B et al (1998) BRCA-associated breast cancer in young women. J Clin Oncol 16:1642–1649

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Verhoog LC, Brekelmans CT, Seynaeve C et al (2000) Contralateral breast cancer risk is influenced by the age at onset in BRCA1-associated breast cancer. Br J Cancer 83:384–386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Haffty BG, Harrold E, Khan AJ et al (2002) Outcome of conservatively managed early-onset breast cancer by BRCA1/2 status. Lancet 359:1471–1477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brekelmans CT, Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Seynaeve C et al (2007) Tumour characteristics, survival and prognostic factors of hereditary breast cancer from BRCA2-, BRCA1- and non-BRCA1/2 families as compared to sporadic breast cancer cases. Eur J Cancer 43:867–876

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Graeser MK, Engel C, Rhiem K et al (2009) Contralateral breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 27:5887–5892

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Metcalfe K, Lynch HT, Ghadirian P et al (2004) Contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 22:2328–2335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Metcalfe K, Gershman S, Lynch HT et al Predictors of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers (submitted)

  11. Brekelmans CT, Seynaeve C, Menke-Pluymers M et al (2006) Survival and prognostic factors in BRCA1-associated breast cancer. Ann Oncol 17:391–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Seynaeve C, Verhoog LC, van de Bosch LM et al (2004) Ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence in hereditary breast cancer following breast-conserving therapy. Eur J Cancer 40:1150–1158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Robson ME, Chappuis PO, Satagopan J et al (2004) A combined analysis of outcome following breast cancer: differences in survival based on BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation status and administration of adjuvant treatment. Breast Cancer Res 6:R8–R17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Robson M, Svahn T, McCormick B et al (2005) Appropriateness of breast-conserving treatment of breast carcinoma in women with germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2: a clinic-based series. Cancer 103:44–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pierce LJ, Levin AM, Rebbeck TR et al (2006) Ten-year multi-institutional results of breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy in BRCA1/2-associated stage I/II breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:2437–2443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eccles D, Simmonds P, Goddard J et al (2001) Familial breast cancer: an investigation into the outcome of treatment for early stage disease. Fam Cancer 1:65–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Donegan WL, Perez-Mesa CM, Watson FR (1966) A biostatistical study of locally recurrent breast carcinoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet 122:529–540

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pierce LJ, Phillips KA, Griffith KA et al (2010) Local therapy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with operable breast cancer: comparison of breast conservation and mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 121:389–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Domchek SM, Friebel TM, Singer CF (2010) Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality. JAMA 304:967–975

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rebbeck TR, Levin AM, Eisen A et al (1999) Breast cancer risk after bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1475–1479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Eisen A, Lubinski J, Klijn J et al (2005) Breast cancer risk following bilateral oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: an international case-control study. J Clin Oncol 23:7491–7496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rebbeck TR, Kauff ND, Domchek SM (2009) Meta-analysis of risk reduction estimates associated with risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:80–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chappuis PO, Goffin J, Wong N et al (2002) A significant response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in BRCA1/2 related breast cancer. J Med Genet 39:608–610

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fourquet A, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Kirova YM et al (2009) Familial breast cancer: clinical response to induction chemotherapy or radiotherapy related to BRCA1/2 mutations status. Am J Clin Oncol 32:127–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wong Wong Keet A, Al-Rafae M, Chappuis PO, Brunet JS, Ghadirian P, Foulkes WD (2009) Long-term outcome after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in BRCA1/2 carriers. Int J Cancer 125:2236–2238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kennedy RD, Quinn JE, Mullan PB, Johnston PG, Harkin DP (2004) The role of BRCA1 in the cellular response to chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:1659–1668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bhattacharyya A, Ear US, Koller BH, Weichselbaum RR, Bishop DK (2000) The breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 is required for subnuclear assembly of Rad51 and survival following treatment with the DNA cross-linking agent cisplatin. J Biol Chem 275:23899–23903

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Thangaraju M, Kaufmann SH, Couch FJ (2000) BRCA1 facilitates stress-induced apoptosis in breast and ovarian cancer cell lines. J Biol Chem 275:33487–33496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Freneaux P, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Mouret E et al (2000) Low expression of bcl-2 in Brca1-associated breast cancers. Br J Cancer 83:1318–1322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Quinn JE, Kennedy RD, Mullan PB et al (2003) BRCA1 functions as a differential modulator of chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. Cancer Res 6319:6221–6228

    Google Scholar 

  31. Byrski T, Gronwald J, Huzarski T, Grzybowska E, Budryk M, Stawicka M, Mierzwa T, Szwiec M, Wisniowski R, Siolek M, Dent R, Lubinski J, Narod S (2010) Pathologic complete response rates in young women with BRCA1-positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 28:375–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S et al (2005) Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 366:2087–2106

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, Lickley LA, Rawlinson E, Sun P, Narod SA (2007) Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 13:4429–4434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Brenner DJ, Shuryak I (2007) Reducing second primary breast cancers: a potential role for prophylactic mammary irradiation. J Clin Oncol 25:4868–4872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation (Ontario Chapter). Dr. Metcalfe is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Ontario Women’s Health Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven A. Narod.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Metcalfe, K., Lynch, H.T., Ghadirian, P. et al. Risk of ipsilateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 127, 287–296 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1336-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1336-7

Keywords

Navigation