Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Breast Cancer Screening among Low-Income or Uninsured Women: Results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Pogram, July 1995 to March 2002 (United States)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective To describe the results of breast cancer screening among low-income and uninsured women in the only national organized screening program in the US, the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP). Methods We analyzed mammography and diagnostic follow-up data for 789,647 women who received their first mammogram in the NBCCEDP and 454,754 subsequent mammograms among these women. We calculated the rate of mammograms with abnormal findings, diagnostic follow-up, biopsy, and cancers detected per 1000 mammograms by age and racial or ethnic groups. Positive Predictive Values (PPVs) were estimated for abnormal mammograms and biopsy.

Results Nearly 64% of the women screened in the program were from 50 to 64 years of age and about 46% were members of racial or ethnic minority groups. Women aged 40 to 49 years had the highest rates of abnormal mammograms and of diagnostic follow-up. However, cancer detection rates were highest in women aged 60 to 64 years. In addition, the PPVs for both abnormal mammograms and biopsy were highest in the oldest age group.

Conclusions Cancer detection rates and PPVs for both abnormal mammograms and biopsy were highest in women aged 50 years or more. These results support the programs focus on screening women aged 50 and older for breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. InstitutionalAuthorNameAmerican Cancer Society (2004) Cancer Facts and Figures 2004 Atlanta GA

    Google Scholar 

  2. LL Humphery M Helfand BKS Chan SH. Woolf (2002) ArticleTitleBreast Cancer Screening: a summary of the Evidence Ann Int Med 137 IssueID5 part 1 347–360

    Google Scholar 

  3. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2002) Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, 3rd edn: Periodic Updates (available Winter 2002/03) Screening for Breast Cancer, www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspsbrca.htm

  4. J Swan N Breen RJ Coates BK Rimer NC Lee (2003) ArticleTitleProgress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey Cancer 97 IssueID6 1528–1540 Occurrence Handle12627518 Occurrence Handle10.1002/cncr.11208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. EE Calle WD Flanders MJ Thun LM Martin (1993) ArticleTitleDemographic predictors of mammography and pap smear screening in U.S.women Am J Public Health 83 IssueID1 53–60 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC3M7kslc%3D Occurrence Handle8417607

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. RM Henson SE Wyatt NC Lee (1996) ArticleTitleThe National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: a comprehensive public health response to two major health issues for women J Public Health Manage Pract 2 36–47 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvivVaqtQ%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. DS May NC Lee MR Nadel RM Henson DS Miller (1998) ArticleTitleThe National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report of the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women Am J Radiol 170 97–104 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FosFKltA%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. HW Lawson NC Lee SF Thames R Henson DS Miller (1998) ArticleTitleCervical cancer screening among low-income women: results of a national screening program, 1991–1995 Obstet Gynecol 92 745–52 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FgvVOqsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9794662 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00257-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. DS May NC Lee LC Richardson AG Guistozzi J Bobo (2000) ArticleTitleMammography and breast cancer detection by race and Hispanic ethnicity: results from a national program Cancer Causes Control 11 697–705 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3crhtVGlsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11065006 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008900220924

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. VB Benard CR Eheman HW Lawson et al. (2004) ArticleTitleCervical Screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1995–2001 J Obstet Gynecol 103 IssueID3 564–571

    Google Scholar 

  11. American College of Radiology (1995) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, 2nd edn, Reston, VA: American College of Radiology

  12. InstitutionalAuthorNameAmerican Joint Committee on Cancer (1992) Manual for the Staging of Cancer EditionNumber4th edn JB Lippincott Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  13. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1986) Summary staging guide for the cancer Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) reporting system. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, pp 115–116. NIH publication no. 86-2313

  14. Breslow NE, Day NE. The design and analysis of cohort studies (1987) In: Statistical Methods in Cancer Research: Vol II. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Scientific Publications no. 82:58–59

  15. JK Bobo JA Shapiro J Schulman CL Wolters (2004) ArticleTitleOn-schedule mammography rescreening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program Cancer Epidemiol, Biomarkers Prevent 13 IssueID4 620–630

    Google Scholar 

  16. CD Lehman E White S Peacock MJ Drucker N Urban (1999) ArticleTitleEffect of age and breast density on screening mammograms with false-positive findings Am J Roentgenol 173 IssueID6 1651–1655 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FkvFGisg%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. PA Carney DL Miglioretti BC Yankaskas (2003) ArticleTitleIndividual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography Ann Int Med 138 IssueID3 168–175 Occurrence Handle12558355

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Health Canada (2003) Organized Breast Cancer Screening Programs in Canada, 1999 and 2000 report. Health Canada, Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A OK9

  19. BreastScreen Victoria (2001) Annual Statistical Report, 2000. Carlton South, Victoria

  20. Smith-Bindman S, Shu PW, Miglioretti DL et al. (2003) Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United Kingdom. JAMA 290(16): 2129–2137, Oct. 22, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  21. R Ballard-Barbash SH Taplin BC Yankashas VL Ernster RD Rosenberg PA Carney WE Barlow BM Geller K Kerlikowske BK Edwards CF Lynch N Urban CA Chervala CR Key SP Poplack JK Worden LG Kessler (1997) ArticleTitleBreast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: A National Mammography Screening and Outcomes Database Am J Radiol 169 1001–1008 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiH2MzotlU%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christie R. Eheman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eheman, C.R., Benard, V.B., Blackman, D. et al. Breast Cancer Screening among Low-Income or Uninsured Women: Results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Pogram, July 1995 to March 2002 (United States). Cancer Causes Control 17, 29–38 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-005-4558-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-005-4558-y

Keywords

Navigation