Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A remarkable reduction of breast cancer deaths in screened versus unscreened women: a case-referent study

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

We designed a case-referent study to investigate the effect of mammographic screening at the individual level, looking at the association of breast cancer death with screening history.

Methods

The study population included all women aged 50–75 in the province of Limburg, the Netherlands who had been invited to the screening program from 1989 to 2006. From this population, 118 cases originated who died of breast cancer in 2004 or 2005. The screening history of these cases was collected and compared with a sample of the invited population. The breast cancer death rate in the screened relative to the unscreened women was estimated as the odds ratio (OR). This OR was adjusted for self-selection bias, the difference in baseline risk for breast cancer death between screened and unscreened women.

Results

Analysis of the data showed a breast cancer mortality reduction of 70% in the screened versus the unscreened women (OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.14–0.63). The magnitude of self-selection was estimated specifically for Limburg. After correction for self-selection bias, the effect of screening increased to 76% (OR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.10–0.58).

Conclusion

Screening resulted in a remarkable reduction in breast cancer mortality. Contrary to findings in other countries, adjustment for self-selection in Limburg had no influence on the impact of screening. Thanks to a well-organized centralized screening program, similar results are expected in other regions of the Netherlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention (2002) Breast Cancer Screening, vol 7. Lyon, IARC

    Google Scholar 

  2. Holland R, Rijken H, Hendriks JHCL (2007) The Dutch population-based mammography screening: 30-year experience. Breast Care 2:12–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Otten JD, Broeders MJ, Fracheboud J, Otto SJ, de Koning HJ, Verbeek AL (2008) Impressive time-related influence of the Dutch screening programme on breast cancer incidence, mortality, 1975–2006. Int J Cancer 123:1929–1934

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fracheboud J, Otto SJ, van Dijck JA, Broeders MJ, Verbeek AL, de Koning HJ (2004) Decreased rates of advanced breast cancer due to mammography screening in The Netherlands. Br J Cancer 91:861–867

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vervoort MM, Draisma G, Fracheboud J, Poll-Franse LV, de Koning HJ (2004) Trends in the usage of adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer in the Netherlands and its effect on mortality. Br J Cancer 91:242–247

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sasco AJ, Day NE, Walter SD (1986) Case-control studies for the evaluation of screening. J Chronic Dis 39:399–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Allgood PC, Warwick J, Warren RM, Day NE, Duffy SW (2007) A case-control study of the impact of the East Anglian breast screening programme on breast cancer mortality. Br J Cancer 98:206–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Broeders MJ, Verbeek AL (2005) Mammographic screening only matters in the detectable preclinical period of breast cancer. J Med Screen 12:107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weiss NS, McKnight B, Stevens NG (1992) Approaches to the analysis of case-control studies of the efficacy of screening for cancer. Am J Epidemiol 135:817–823

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kleinbaum DG (1994) Logistic regression: a self-learning text. Springer, New York, p 227

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cronin KA, Weed DL, Connor RJ, Prorok PC (1998) Case-control studies of cancer screening: theory and practice. J Natl Cancer Inst 90:498–504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. O’Byrne AM, Kavanagh AM, Ugoni A, Diver F (2000) Predictors of non-attendance for second round mammography in an Australian mammographic screening programme. J Med Screen 7:190–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Roder D, Houssami N, Farshid G et al (2008) Population screening and intensity of screening are associated with reduced breast cancer mortality: evidence of efficacy of mammography screening in Australia. Breast Cancer Res Treat 108:409–416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zackrisson S, Andersson I, Manjer J, Janzon L (2004) Non-attendance in breast cancer screening is associated with unfavourable socio-economic circumstances and advanced carcinoma. Int J Cancer 108:754–760

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Paci E, Duffy SW, Giorgi D et al (2002) Quantification of the effect of mammographic screening on fatal breast cancers: The Florence Programme 1990–96. Br J Cancer 87:65–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Duffy SW, Cuzick J, Tabár L et al (2002) Correcting for non-compliance bias in case-control studies to evaluate cancer screening programmes. Appl Stat 51(2):235–243

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fielder HM, Warwick J, Brook D et al (2004) A case-control study to estimate the impact on breast cancer death of the breast screening programme in Wales. J Med Screen 11:194–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schopper D, de Wolf C (2009) How effective are breast cancer screening programmes by mammography? Review of the current evidence. Eur J Cancer 45:1916–1923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gabe R, Tryggvadottir L, Sigfusson BF, Olafsdottir GH, Sigurdsson K, Duffy SW (2007) A case-control study to estimate the impact of the Icelandic population-based mammography screening program on breast cancer death. Acta Radiol 48:948–955

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Puliti D, Miccinesi G, Collina N et al (2008) Effectiveness of service screening: a case-control study to assess breast cancer mortality reduction. Br J Cancer 99:423–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aro AR, de Koning HJ, Absetz P, Schreck M (2001) Two distinct groups of non-attenders in an organized mammography screening program. Breast Cancer Res Treat 70:145–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bare ML, Montes J, Florensa R, Sentis M, Donoso L (2003) Factors related to non-participation in a population-based breast cancer screening programme. Eur J Cancer Prev 12:487–494

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hartman E, van den Muijsenbergh ME, Haneveld RW (2009) Breast cancer screening participation among Turks and Moroccans in the Netherlands: exploring reasons for nonattendance. Eur J Cancer Prev 18:349–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Visser O, van der Kooy K, van Peppen AM, Ory FG, van Leeuwen FE (2004) Breast cancer risk among first-generation migrants in the Netherlands. Br J Cancer 90:2135–2137

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zahl PH, Maehlen J, Welch HG (2008) The natural history of invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography. Arch Intern Med 168:2311–2316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jorgensen KJ, Gotzsche PC (2009) Overdiagnosis in publicly organised mammography screening programmes: systematic review of incidence trends. BMJ 339:b2587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by a grant from the Dutch Cancer Society (project number: KUN 2006-3571). The funding source had no involvement in the study. We thank both the Comprehensive Cancer Centre Limburg and Statistics Netherlands for providing the data for this study. We thank Roger Staats for his contribution to this paper as a medical writer. He works at “Radboud in’ to Languages” Radboud University Nijmegen.

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellen Paap.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paap, E., Holland, R., Heeten, G.J.d. et al. A remarkable reduction of breast cancer deaths in screened versus unscreened women: a case-referent study. Cancer Causes Control 21, 1569–1573 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-010-9585-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-010-9585-7

Keywords

Navigation