Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Implications of molecular systematic analyses on the conservation of rare and threatened taxa: Contrasting examples from Malvaceae

  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Systematic research provides essential evidence for setting conservation priorities for rare and endangered taxa. Phylogenetic analyses can identify cryptic, genetically distinct lineages as well as actively interbreeding, and hence, non-distinctive lineages earlier perceived as separate taxa. A major aim of this study was to identify genetically distinct, rare lineages within two Malvaceae sister-genera, Sidalcea and Eremalche. The focus was two taxon-pairs each consisting of one rare and one more common taxon. The results demonstrate that even within two closely related genera, with a large number of rare taxa, molecular phylogenetic analyses can reveal contrasting degrees of evolutionary divergence and thus contrasting conservation implications for threatened taxa. Contrary to expectations, the substitution rate in the nuclear ribosomal transcribed spacers for annual Eremalche did not correspond to the faster evolutionary rate of annuals – compared to perennials – detected earlier within Sidalcea. Branch lengths in the (annual) Eremalche clade were shorter than those of annual members of Sidalcea. The phylogenetic analyses showed that the rare and endangered S. keckii and E. kernensis each are most closely related to a common species that has been regarded as insufficiently distinct to warrant separate taxonomic status. An additional aim of the study was to test the utility of the Phylogenetic Diversity (PD) measure to formalize the procedure of prioritizing conservation efforts. The measure demonstrated S. keckii (but not E. kernensis) to be genetically distinct from its closest relative and a good candidate for conservation. The PD measure was earlier used for assessing conservation priorities for areas, but proved useful to more objectively suggest conservation priorities among threatened taxa. Because this measure is calculated directly from the data, it retains more character information and gives a better representation of genetic diversity than other measures relying on tree topologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • P-M Agapow R Crozier (1998) Conserve 3.2.2 Department of Human Genetics and Variation, LaTrobe University Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • K Andreasen BG Baldwin (2001) ArticleTitleUnequal evolutionary rates between annual and perennial lineages of checker mallows Sidalcea, Malvaceae: Evidence from 18S-26S rDNA internal and external transcribed spacers Mol. Biol. Evol. 18 936–944

    Google Scholar 

  • K Andreasen BG Baldwin (2003a) ArticleTitleNuclear ribosomal DNA sequence polymorphism and hybridization in checker mallows (Sidalcea, Malvaceae) Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 29 563–581

    Google Scholar 

  • K Andreasen BG Baldwin (2003b) ArticleTitleReexamination of relationships, habital evolution, and phylogeography of checker mallows (Sidalcea, Malvaceae) based on molecular phylogenetic data Am. J. Bot. 90 436–444

    Google Scholar 

  • K Andreasen BG Baldwin B Bremer (1999) ArticleTitlePhylogenetic utility of the nuclear rDNA ITS region in the subfamily Ixoroideae Rubiaceae: Comparisons with cpDNA rbcL sequence data Plant Syst. Evol. 217 119–135

    Google Scholar 

  • K Andreasen EA Cypher BG Baldwin (2002) ArticleTitleSympatry between desert mallow, Eremalche exilis and Kern mallow, E. kernenesis (Malvaceae): Molecular and morphological perspectives Madroño 49 22–24

    Google Scholar 

  • BG Baldwin (2000) ArticleTitleRoles for modern plant systematics in discovery and conservation of fine-scale biodiversity Madroño 47 219–229

    Google Scholar 

  • BG Baldwin S Markos (1998) ArticleTitlePhylogenetic utility of the external transcribed spacer ETS of 18S-26S rDNA: Congruence of ETS and ITS trees of Calycadenia Compositae Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 10 449–463

    Google Scholar 

  • BG Baldwin RE Preston BL Wessa M Wetherwax (2001) ArticleTitleA biosystematic and phylogenetic assessment of sympatric taxa in Blepharizonia (Compositae-Madiinae) Syst. Bot. 26 184–194

    Google Scholar 

  • BG Baldwin MJ Sanderson JM Porter MF Wojciechowski CS Campbell MJ Donoghue (1995) ArticleTitleThe ITS region of nuclear ribosmal DNA: A valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 82 247–277

    Google Scholar 

  • FK Barker GF Barrowclough JG Groth (2002) ArticleTitleA phylogenetic hypothesis for passerine birds: Taxonomic and biogeographic implications of an analysis of nuclear DNA sequence data Proc. R. Lond B. Biol. Sci. 269 295–308

    Google Scholar 

  • DM Bates (1992) ArticleTitleGynodioecy, endangerment, and status of Eremalche kernensis Malvaceae Phytologia 72 48–54

    Google Scholar 

  • DM Bates OJ Blanchard (1970) ArticleTitleChromosome numbers in the Malvaceae. II. New or otherwise noteworthy counts relevent to classification in the Malvaceae, Malveae Am. J. Bot. 8 927–934

    Google Scholar 

  • P Beardsley S Schoenig J Whittall R Olmstead (2004) ArticleTitlePatterns of evolution in western North America Mimulus (Phrymaceae) Am. J. Bot. 91 474

    Google Scholar 

  • B Bowen S Karl (1999) ArticleTitleIn war, truth is the first casualty Conserv. Biol. 13 1013–1016

    Google Scholar 

  • J Bousquet SH Strauss AH Doerksen RA Price (1992) ArticleTitleExtensive variation in evolutionary rate of rbcL gene sequences among seed plants Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89 7844–7848

    Google Scholar 

  • California Native Plant Society (2002) Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California, California Native Plant Society Press, Sacramento, California

  • California Native Plant Society (2003) Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v 6.2). Rare Plant Scientific Advisory Committee. California Native Plant Society. Sacramento, California. http://www.cnps.org/inventory

  • R Crozier (1992) ArticleTitleGenetic diversity and the agony of choice Biol. Conserv. 61 11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • SR Downie DS Katz-Downie (1996) ArticleTitleA molecular phylogeny of Apiaceae subfamily Apioideae: Evidence from nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences Am. J. Bot. 83 234–251

    Google Scholar 

  • JJ Doyle JL Doyle (1987) ArticleTitleA rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue Phytochem. Bull. 19 11– 15

    Google Scholar 

  • P Erixon B Svennblad T Britton B Oxelman (2003) ArticleTitleReliability of Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap frequencies in phylogenetics Syst. Biol. 52 665–673

    Google Scholar 

  • D Faith (1992) ArticleTitleConservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity Biol. Conserv. 61 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • J Felsenstein (1985) ArticleTitleConfidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap Evolution 39 783–791

    Google Scholar 

  • PA Fryxell (1988) ArticleTitleMalvaceae of Mexico Syst. Bot. Monogr. 25 1–469

    Google Scholar 

  • PA Fryxell (1997) ArticleTitleThe American genera of Malvaceae-II Brittonia 49 204–269

    Google Scholar 

  • SR Hill (1993) Sidalcea JC Hickman (Eds) The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California University of California Press Berkeley 755–760

    Google Scholar 

  • DM Hillis C Moritz BK Mabel (1996) Molecular Systematics Sinauer Associates Sunderland, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • JT Howell GH True (1974) ArticleTitleA new Sierran Sidalcea Four Seasons 4 20–22

    Google Scholar 

  • J Huelsenbeck F Ronquist (2001) ArticleTitleMrBayes. Bayesian Inference of Phylogeny Bioinformatics 17 754–755

    Google Scholar 

  • TH Kearney (1951) ArticleTitleThe American genera of Malvaceae Am. Midland Nat. 46 93–131

    Google Scholar 

  • TH Kearney (1956) ArticleTitleNotes on Malvaceae. VIII. Eremalche Madroño 13 241–243

    Google Scholar 

  • J Laroche J Bousquet (1999) ArticleTitleEvolution of the mitochondrial rps3 intron in perennial and annual angiosperms and homology to nad5 intron 1 Mol. Biol. Evol. 16 441–452

    Google Scholar 

  • S Malcomber (2002) ArticleTitlePhylogeny of Gaertnera Lam. (Rubiaceae) based on multiple DNA markers: Evidence of a rapid radiation in a widespread, morphologically diverse genus Evolution 56 42–57

    Google Scholar 

  • A Mast T Givnish (2002) ArticleTitleHistorical biogeography and the origin of stomatal distributions in Banksia and Dryandra (Proteaceae) based on their cpDNA phylogeny Am. J. Bot. 89 1311–1323

    Google Scholar 

  • B Mishler (1995) ArticleTitlePlant systematics and conservation: Science and society Madroño 42 103–113

    Google Scholar 

  • C Moritz (1995) ArticleTitleUses of molecular phylogenies for conservation Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 349 113–118

    Google Scholar 

  • N Myers RA Mittermeier CG Mittermeier GAB da Fonseca J Kents (2000) ArticleTitleBiodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities Nature 400 853–858

    Google Scholar 

  • Oregon Natural Heritage Information Center (2001) Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon (online edition). Oregon Natural Heritage Program, Portland, Oregon http://oregonstate.edu/ornhic/

  • M Pérez-Losada C Jara G Bond-Buckup K Crandall (2002) ArticleTitleConservation phylogenetics of Chilean freshwater crabs Aegla (Anomura, Aeglidae): Assigning priorities for aquatic habitat protection Biol. Conserv. 105 345–353

    Google Scholar 

  • ASL Rodrigues K Gaston (2002) ArticleTitleMaximising phylogenetic diversity in the seletion of networks of conservation areas Biol. Conserv. 105 103–111

    Google Scholar 

  • M Simmons M Pickett M Miya (2004) ArticleTitleHow meaningful are Bayesian support values? Mol. Biol. Evol. 21 188–199

    Google Scholar 

  • M Skinner D Tibor RL Bittman B Ertter TS Ross S Boyd AC Sanders JR Shevock DWm Taylor (1995) ArticleTitleResearch needs for conserving California’s rare plants Madroño 42 211–241

    Google Scholar 

  • RL Small JA Ryburn RC Cronn T Seelanan JF Wendel (1998) ArticleTitleThe tortoise and the hare: Choosing between noncoding plastome and nuclear adh sequences for phylogeny reconstruction in a recently diverged plant group Am. J. Bot. 85 1301–1315

    Google Scholar 

  • T Smith K Holder D Girman K O’Keefe B Larison Y Chan (2000) ArticleTitleComparative avian phylogeography of Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea mountains: Implications for conservation Mol. Ecol. 9 1505–1516

    Google Scholar 

  • P Soltis M Gitzendanner (1999) ArticleTitleMolecular systematics and the conservation of rare species Conserv. Biol. 13 471–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (2004) Action Programs for Threatened species. http://www.naturvardsverket.se

  • DL Swofford (2002) PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony *and Other Methods Sinauer Associates Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • LE Urbatsch BG Baldwin MJ Donoghue (2000) ArticleTitlePhylogeny of the coneflowers and relatives Heliantheae: Asteraceae based on nuclear rDNA internal transcribed spacer ITS sequences and chloroplast DNA restriction site data Syst. Bot. 25 539–565

    Google Scholar 

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (2004) Endangered Species Expenditure Reports 1998–2000. http://endangered.fws.gov/expenditures/19982000.html

  • RI Vane-Wright CJ Humphries PH Williams (1991) ArticleTitleWhat to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice Biol. Conserv. 55 235–254

    Google Scholar 

  • RI Vane-Wright CR Smith IJ Kitching (1994) Systematic assessment of taxic diversity by summation P Forey C Humphries R Vane-Wright (Eds) Systematics and Conservation Evaluation. Clarendon Press Oxford, United Kingdom 309–326

    Google Scholar 

  • TJ White T Bruns S Lee J Taylor (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics M Innis D Gelfand J Sninsky TJ White (Eds) PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications Academic Press San Diego, California 315–322

    Google Scholar 

  • A Whiting S Lawler P Horwitz K Crandall (2000) ArticleTitleBiogeographic regionalization of Australia: Assigning conservation priorities based on endemic crayfish phylogenetics Anim. Conserv. 3 155–163

    Google Scholar 

  • C-A Whittle M Johnston (2003) ArticleTitleBroad-scale analysis contradicts the theory that generation time affects molecular evolutionary rates in plants J. Mol. Evol. 56 223–233

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andreasen, K. Implications of molecular systematic analyses on the conservation of rare and threatened taxa: Contrasting examples from Malvaceae. Conserv Genet 6, 399–412 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-4977-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-4977-z

Key words

Navigation