Skip to main content
Log in

Cognitive Bias in Men's Processing of Negative Social Information: The Role of Social Anxiety, Toughness as a Masculine Role Norm, and Their Interaction

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cognitive approaches to social anxiety focus on a person's tendency to make biased judgments for threat-relevant stimuli. This notion was tested relative to whether men's adherence to a toughness male role norm moderates the relation between social anxiety and biased judgments for negative interpersonal events. For negative interpersonal events not involving male role norms, results indicated that only social anxiety was related to probability estimates, while for cost estimates there was a unique association for social anxiety and a significant social anxiety by toughness interaction such that men who were high in both made greater cost estimates. For events involving explicit male role norms, social anxiety and toughness evidenced unique relationships with probability estimates. For cost estimates, in addition to unique associations for social anxiety and toughness, there was a significant interaction, which showed that men high in both characteristics gave the highest cost ratings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Arkin, R. M., Lake, E. A., & Baumgardner, A. B. (1986). Shyness and self-presentation. In W. H. Jones, J. M. Cheek, & S. R. Briggs (Eds.), Shyness: Perspectives on research and treatment (pp. 189–203). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, M. W., & Ferguson, P. (2001). Relational schemas: The activation of interpersonal knowledge structures in social anxiety. In W. R. Crozier & L. E. Alden (Eds.), International handbook of social anxiety: Concepts, research, and intervention relating to self and shyness (pp. 235–257). Sussex, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, M. W., & Regehr, C. (1998). Assimilation/contrast effects in priming of evaluative expectations. Unpublished data, University of Winnipeg, Canada.

  • Brannon, R. (1976). The male sex role: Our culture's blueprint for manhood and what it's done for us lately. In D. David & R. Brannon (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role (pp. 1–48). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannon, R., & Juni, S. (1984). A scale for measuring attitudes to masculinity. Psychological Document, 14(6), (Ms. 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, M. A. (2002). Shyness and toughness: Unique and moderated relations with men's emotional expression. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, M. A., Berko, E., & Haase, R. F. (1998). Shyness, masculine ideology, physical attractiveness, and emotional inexpressiveness: Testing a mediational model of men's interpersonal competence. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruch, M. A., Gorsky, J. M., Collins, T. M., & Berger, P. A. (1989). Shyness and sociability reexamined: A multicomponent analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 904–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1983). Cognitive processes in anxiety. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 5, 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheek, J. M., & Melchoir, L. A. (1990). Shyness, self-esteem, and self-consciousness. In H. Leitenberg (Ed.), Handbook of social and evaluative anxiety (pp. 47–82). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. M. (2001). A cognitive perspective on social phobia. In W. R. Crozier & L. E. Alden (Eds.), International handbook of social anxiety: Concepts, research and intervention relating to the self and shyness (pp. 405–429). Sussex, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 69–93). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S., & Akin, L. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation: Regression analyses for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, W. R., & Alden, L. E. (2001). The social nature of social anxiety. In W. R. Crozier & L. E. Alden (Eds.), International handbook of social anxiety: Concepts, research, and interventions relating to self and shyness (pp. 1–20). Sussex, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, D., & Brannon, R. (Eds.). (1976). The forty nine percent solution: The male sex role. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. R., Tokar, D. M., Good, G. E., & Snell, A. F. (1998). More on the structure of male role norms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 135–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foa, E. B., Franklin, M. E., Perry, K. J., & Herbert, J. D. (1996). Cognitive bias in generalized social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 433–439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foa, E. B., & Kozak, M. J. (1985). Treatment of anxiety disorders: Implications for psychopathology. In A. H. Tuma & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and the anxiety disorders, (pp. 421–452). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Foa, E. B., & Kozak, M. J. (1986). Emotional processing of fear: Exposure to corrective information. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 20–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, S., Stinson, L., Ickes, W., Bissonnette, V., & Briggs, S. R. (1991). Shyness and physical attractiveness in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimberg, R. G., & Juster, H. R. (1996). Cognitive-behavioral treatments: Literature review. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 261–309). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1991). Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: Conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 456–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, S. G. (2004). Cognitive mediation of treatment change in social phobia. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 392–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopko, D. R., Stowell, J., Jones, W. H., & Armento, M. E. A. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Revised Cheek and Buss Shyness Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 185–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. S. (1987). Rethinking “masculinity”! New directions in research. In M. S. Kimmel (Ed.), Changing men: New directions in research on men and masculinity (pp. 9–24). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahalik, J. R. (1999). Incorporating a gender role strain perspective in assessing and treating men's cognitive distortions. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30, 333–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattick, R. P., & Clark, J. C. (1998). Development and validation of measures of social phobia, scrutiny fear, and social interaction anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 455–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376–390.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meleshko, K. G. A., & Alden, L. E. (1993). Anxiety and self-disclosure: Toward a motivational model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1000–1009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, R. S. L., & Rubin, K. H. (1993). Socialization factors in the development of social withdrawal. In K. H. Rubin & J. B. Asendorpf (Eds.), Social withdrawal, inhibition, and shyness in childhood (pp. 117–148). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, J. M., Good, G. E., & Holmes, S. (1995). Fifteen years of research on men's gender role conflict: New paradigms for empirical research. In R. Levent & W. Pollack (Eds.), Foundations for a new psychology of men (pp. 164–206). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. (1981). The myth of masculinity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleck, J. H. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm. An update. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), The new psychology of men (pp. 11–32). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold, A. A., Herbert, J. D., & Franklin, M. E. (2003). Cognitive bias in adolescents with social anxiety disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 639–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinn, J. S. (1997). The predictive and discriminant validity of masculine ideology. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, S. H., Donovan, C., & Brechman-Toussaint, M. (1999). Social skills, social outcomes, and cognitive features of childhood social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 211–221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. H., & Pleck, J. H. (1986). The structure of male role norms. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 531–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. H., Pleck, J. H., & Ferrera, D. L. (1993). Men and masculinities: Scales for masculinity ideology and masculinity-related constructs. Sex Roles, 27, 573–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Friend, R. (1969). Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 448–457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, R. N., Lennox, R. D., & Cutler, B. L. (1986). Getting along and getting ahead: Empirical support for a theory of protective and acquisitive self-presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 356–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author expresses appreciation to Eric Deemer and Shaden Sousou for their assistance in conducting this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monroe A. Bruch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruch, M.A. Cognitive Bias in Men's Processing of Negative Social Information: The Role of Social Anxiety, Toughness as a Masculine Role Norm, and Their Interaction. Cogn Ther Res 31, 273–289 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-006-9001-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-006-9001-5

KEY WORDS:

Navigation