Skip to main content
Log in

Alternative splicing, gene duplication and connectivity in the genetic interaction network of the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the relationship between gene duplication, alternative splicing, and connectedness in a predicted genetic interaction network using published data from the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans. Similar to previous results from mammals, genes belonging to families with only one member (“singletons”) were significantly more likely to lack alternative splicing than were members of large multi-gene families. Genes belonging to multi-gene families lacking alternative splicing tended to have higher connectedness in the genetic interaction network than did genes in families that included one or more alternatively spliced members. Moreover, alternatively spliced genes were significantly more likely to interact with other alternatively spliced genes. These results support the hypothesis that certain key proteins with high degrees of network connectedness are subject to selection opposing the occurrence of alternatively spliced forms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ast G (2004) How did alternative splicing evolve? Nat Rev Genet 5:773–782

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barabási AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286:509–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batagelj V, Mrvar A (2006) Pajek: program for analysis and visualization of large networks. Ljubljana

  • Blencowe BJ (2006) Alternative splicing: new insights from global analyses. Cell 126:37–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne AB, Weinrauch MT, Wong V, Koeva M, Dixon SJ, Stuart JM, Roy PJ (2007) A global analysis of genetic interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Biol 6:8

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander M, Wolfe DA (1973) Nonparametric statistical methods. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes AL, Friedman R (2005) Gene duplication and the properties of biological networks. J Mol Evol 61:758–764

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim E, Magen A, Ast G (2007) Different levels of alternative splicing among eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 35:125–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kopelman NM, Lancet D, Yanai I (2005) Alternative splicing and gene duplication are inversely correlated evolutionary mechanisms. Nat Genet 37:588–589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lareau LF, Green RE, Bhatnagar RS, Brenner SE (2004) The evolving roles of alternative splicing. Curr Opin Struct Biol 14:273–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Papp B, Pál C, Hurst LD (2003) Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature 424:194–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ravasz E, Somera AL, Mongru DA, Oltvai ZN, Barabási AL (2002) Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science 297:1551–1555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rukov JL, Irimia M, Mørk S, Lund VK, Vinther J, Arctander P (2007) High qualitative and quantitative splicing in Caenorhabditis elegans and Caenorhabdidtis briggsiae. Mol Biol Evol 24:909–917

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stetefeld J, Ruegg MA (2005) Structural and functional diversity generated by alternative mRNA splicing. Trends Biochem Sci 30:515–521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su Z, Wang J, Yu J, Huang X, Gu X (2006) Evolution of alternative splicing after gene duplication. Genome Res 16:182–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner A (2001) The yeast protein interaction network evolves rapidly and contains few redundant duplicated genes. Mol Biol Evol 18:1283–1292

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner A (2003) How the global structure of protein interaction networks evolves. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:457–460

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong W, Sternberg PW (2006) Genome-wide prediction of C. elegans genetic interactions. Science 311:1481–1484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X, Gerstein M, Snyder M (2007) Getting connected: analysis and principles of biological networks. Genes Dev 21:1010–1024

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by grant GM43940 from the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Austin L. Hughes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hughes, A.L., Friedman, R. Alternative splicing, gene duplication and connectivity in the genetic interaction network of the nematode worm Caenorhabditis elegans . Genetica 134, 181–186 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-007-9223-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-007-9223-9

Keywords

Navigation