Abstract
Healthcare expenditures in the US are approaching $2 trillion, and hospitals and other healthcare providers are under tremendous pressure to rein in costs. One cost-saving approach which is gaining popularity is the reuse of medical devices which were designed only for a single use. Device makers decry this practice as unsanitary and unsafe, but a growing number of third-party firms are willing to sterilize, refurbish, and/or remanufacture devices and resell them to hospitals at a fraction of the original price. Is this practice safe? Is reliance on single-use devices sustainable? A Markov decision process (MDP) model is formulated to study the trade-offs involved in these decisions. Several key parameters are examined: device costs, device failure probabilities, and failure penalty cost. For each of these parameters, expressions are developed which identify the indifference point between using new and reprocessed devices. The results can be used to inform the debate on the economic, ethical, legal, and environmental dimensions of this complex issue.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alonso-Zaldivar R (2006) US healthcare tab grows faster than the economy. Los Angeles Times, January 10, A15
Girion L, Alonso-Zaldivar R (2006) Steep rise projected for health spending. Los Angeles Times, February 22, C1
Kerber R (2005) Device makers fight reuse of surgical tools. Boston Globe, October 19, D1
Klein A (2005a) Reused devices attract entrepreneurs, scrutiny. Washington Post, December 12, A1
Klein A (2005b) Hospitals save money, but safety is questioned. Washington Post, December 11, A1
Gottfried K-L (2000) Are reprocessed medical devices really as good as new, and does it matter? HEC Forum 12:311–316
Dunn D (2002) Reprocessing single-use devices—the ethical dilemma. AORN J 75:989–999
Tapp A (2003) Reuse of single use medical devices. Can Oper Room Nurs J 21:18–9, 28–9
F W (2004) Singled out? Br J Perioper Nurs 14:122–125 (The Journal of the National Association of Theatre Nurses)
Smith JJ, Agraz JA (2001) Federal regulation of single-use medical devices: a revised FDA policy. Food Drug Law J 56:305–316
Spencer P, Zakaib G, Winter E (2001-2002) The risks of reuse: legal implications for hospitals of reusing single-use medical devices. Hosp Q 5:68–70
Wang EP (2001) Regulatory and legal implications of reprocessing and reuse of single-use medical devices. Food Drug Law J 56:77–98
Berenger SJ, Ferguson JK (2004) Reuse of single-use medical devices: how often does this still occur in Australia? Med J Aust 180:46–7
Fratila O, Tantau M (2006) Cleaning and disinfection in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current status in Romania. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 15:89–93
Koh A, Kawahara K (2005) Current practices and problems in the reuse of single-use devices in Japan. J Med Dent Sci 52:81–89
Abreu EL, Haire DM, Malchesky PS, Wolf-Bloom DF, Cornhill JF (2002) Development of a program model to evaluate the potential for reuse of single-use medical devices: results of a pilot test study. Biomed Instrum Technol 36:389–404 (Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation)
Haley D (2004) Case outsourcing medical device reprocessing. AORN J 79:806–808
Adler S, Scherrer M, Ruckauer KD, Daschner FD (2005) Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 19:268–272
Bourguignon C, Destrumelle AS, Koch S, Grumblat A, Carayon P, Chopard C, Woronoff-Lemsi MC (2003) Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy: a cost-minimization analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 58:226–229
Prat F, Spieler JF, Paci S, Pallier C, Fritsch J, Choury AD, Pelletier G, Raspaud S, Nordmann P, Buffet C (2004) Reliability, cost-effectiveness, and safety of reuse of ancillary devices for ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 60:246–252
Colak T, Ersoz G, Akca T, Kanik A, Aydin S (2004) Efficacy and safety of reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 18:727–731
Ishino Y, Ido K, Sugano K (2005) Contamination with hepatitis B virus DNA in gastrointestinal endoscope channels: risk of infection on reuse after on-site cleaning. Endoscopy 37:548–551
Hirsch N, Beckett A, Collinge J, Scaravilli F, Tabrizi S, Berry S (2005) Lymphocyte contamination of laryngoscope blades—a possible vector for transmission of variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Anaesthesia 60:664–667
Stone T, Brimacombe J, Keller C, Kelley D, Clery G (2004) Residual protein contamination of ProSeal laryngeal mask airways after two washing protocols. Anaesth Intensive Care 32:390–393
Tessarolo F, Caola I, Nollo G, Antolini R, Guarrera GM, Caciagli P (November 2006) Efficiency in endotoxin removal by a reprocessing protocol for electrophysiology catheters based on hydrogen peroxide plasma sterilization. Int J Hyg Environ Health 209(6):557–565 (doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2006.05.001)
Brown SA, Merritt K, Woods TO, McNamee SG, Hitchins VM (2002) Effects of different disinfection and sterilization methods on tensile strength of materials used for single-use devices. Biomed Instrum Technol 36:23–27 (Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation)
da Silva MV, Ade FR, Tde JP, (2005) Safety evaluation of single-use medical devices after submission to simulated reutilization cycles. J AOAC Int 88:823–829
Fedel M, Tessarolo F, Ferrari P, Losche C, Ghassemieh N, Guarrera GM, Nollo G (August 2006) Functional properties and performance of new and reprocessed coronary angioplasty balloon catheters. J Biomed Materi Res B, Appl Biomater 78(2):364–372
Valdez-Flores C, Feldman RM (1989) A survey of preventive maintenance models for stocastically deteriorating single-unit systems. Nav Res Logist 36:419–446
Dekker R, Wildeman RE, Van der Duyn Schouten FA (1997) A review of multi-component maintenance models with economic dependence. Math Methods Oper Res 45:411–435
Derman C (1963) On optimal replacement rules when changes of state are Markovian. In: Bellman R (ed) Mathematical optimization techniques. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, pp 201–210
Ross S (1971) Quality control under Markovian deterioration. Manage Sci 17:587–596
Fleischmann M, Bloemhof-Ruwaard JM, Dekker R, Van der Laan E, Van Nunen JAEE, Van Wassenhove LN (1997) Quantitative models for reverse logistics: a review. Eur J Oper Res 103:1–17
Flapper SDP, Van Nunen JAEE, Van Wassenhove LN (2005) Managing closed-loop supply chains. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Dekker R, Fleischmann M, Inderfurth K, Van Wassenhove LN (2004) Reverse logistics: quantitative models for closed-loop supply chains. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Bloemhof-Ruwaard JM, Krikke H, Van Wassenhove LN (2004) OR models for eco–eco closed-loop supply chain optimization. In: Dekker R, Fleischmann M, Inderfurth K, Van Wassenhove L (eds) Reverse logistics: quantitative models for closed loop supply chains. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 357–379
Inderfurth K, Flapper SDP, Lambert AJDF, Pappis CP, Voutsinas Theodore G (2004) Production planning for product recovery management. In: Dekker R, Fleischmann M, Inderfurth K, Van Wassenhove LN (eds) Reverse logistics: quantitative models for closed loop supply chains. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 249–274
Van der Laan EA, Kiesmuller G, Kuik R, Vlachos D, Dekker R (2004) Stochastic inventory control for product recovery management. In: Dekker R, Fleischmann M, Inderfurth K, Van Wassenhove LN (eds) Reverse logistics: Quantitative models for closed loop supply chains. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 181–220
Savaskan RC, Bhattacharya S, Van Wassenhove LN (2004) Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Manage Sci 50:239–252
Flapper SDP, Kiesmüller GP (1999) Reusable distribution items with a technically preset maximum number of usage. In: Proceedings second international working seminar on reuse, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, pp 45–54, March 1–3 1999
Heyman DP, Sobel MJ (1984) Stochastic models in operations research: stochastic optimization, vol II. McGraw-Hill, New York
Wolff RW (1989) Stochastic modeling and the theory of queues. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Kazaz B, Sloan T (May 2006) Production policies for multi-product systems with deteriorating process condition. Working paper, Univ. of Massachusetts Lowell, College of Management
Abelson R (2005) To fight rising costs, hospitals seek allies in the operating room. New York Times, November 18, C1
Williamson JE (2005) Great expectations: hospitals find FDA regs build stronger case for reprocessing. Healthc Purch News 29:28–32
Beamon BM, Fernandes C (2004) Supply-chain network configuration for product recovery. Prod Plan Control 15:270–281
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sloan, T.W. Safety-cost trade-offs in medical device reuse: a Markov decision process model. Health Care Manage Sci 10, 81–93 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-006-9007-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-006-9007-2