Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An empirical study for medication delivery improvement based on healthcare professionals’ perceptions of medication delivery system

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Medication errors are major safety concerns in all hospital settings. The insufficient knowledge about managerial and process improvement strategies required to reduce medication errors can be considered as one of the most important factors holding back hospitals from achieving the desired goals for patient safety. However, strategies for medication error reduction cannot be successfully implemented without a clear understanding of factors affecting medication delivery errors. This paper presents a study in which healthcare professionals’ perceptions on three factors, namely (1) technical complexity of tasks/connections; (2) resources problems; and (3) qualification of human resources, are analyzed within the medication delivery system at one community hospital. The outcomes of this research are a theoretical model for reducing medication delivery errors and a set of workflow design rules for healthcare professionals to continuously reduce medication delivery errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Institute of Medicine Preventing Medication Errors. Institute of Medicine Report, Washington, D.C., 2006

  2. Weingart S, Page D (2004) Implications for practice: challenges for healthcare leaders in fostering patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 13:ii52–ii56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ramanujam R, Rousseau D (2006) The challenges are organizational, not just clinical. J Organ Behav 27:811–827 doi:10.1002/job.411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Perrow C (1984) Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tucker A, Edmondson A (2002) Managing routine exception: a model of nurse problem solving behavior. Adv Healthc Manage 3:87–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tucker A, Edmondson C (2003) Why hospitals don’t learn from failures: organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. Calif Manage Rev 45:55–72

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tucker A (2004) The impact of operational failures on hospital nurses and their patients. J Oper Manage 22:151–169 doi:10.1016/j.jom.2003.12.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson D, Wolf G, Spear S (2003) Driving improvement in patient care. J Nurs Adm 33:585–595 doi:10.1097/00005110-200311000-00008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Patel V, Branch T, Arocha J (2002) Errors in interpreting quantities as procedures: the case of pharmaceutical label. Int J Med Inform 65:193–211 doi:10.1016/S1386-5056(02)00045-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Uhlig P (2001) Improving patient care in hospital. J Innovative Manage 7:23–45

    Google Scholar 

  11. Spear S, Bowen H (1999) Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System. Harv Bus Rev 77:97–106

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shingo S (1989) A study of the toyota production system from an industrial engineering viewpoint. Productivity, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  13. Womack JP, Jones DT (1996) Lean Thinking. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sobek D, Jimmerson C (2003) Applying the Toyota Production System to a hospital pharmacy. Paper presented at the Industrial Engineering Research Conference, Portland, Oregon

  15. Sobek D, Jimmerson C (2004) A3 reports: Tool for process improvement. Paper presented in the Industrial Engineering Research Conference, Houston, Texas

  16. Jimmerson C, Weber D, Sobek D (2005) Reducing waste and errors: piloting lean principles at IHC. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 31:249–257

    Google Scholar 

  17. Spear S (2005) Fixing healthcare from the inside, today. Harv Bus Rev 83:78–91

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mazur L, Chen S (2007) Improving medication delivery using systems engineering approach. Proceedings of Industrial Engineering Research Conference, Nashville

  19. Mazur L, Chen S (2008) Understanding and reducing waste due to medication errors via systems mapping and analysis. Health Care Manage Sci 11:55–65 doi:10.1007/s10729-007-9024-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. DeWalt K, DeWalt B (2002) Participant observation. AltaMira, Walnut Creek

    Google Scholar 

  21. Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  22. Uribe CL, Schweikhart SB, Pathak DS, Dow M, Marsh GB (2002) Perceived barriers to medication error reporting: an explanatory investigation. J Healthc Manag 47:263–280

    Google Scholar 

  23. Joint Commission (2007) National Patient Safety Goals. Retrieved on May 28, 2007

  24. Slavitt D, Stamps P, Piedmont E, Haase A (1978) Nurses’ satisfaction with their work situation. Nurs Res 27:114–120 doi:10.1097/00006199-197803000-00018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aiken L, Patrician P (2000) Measuring organizational traits of hospitals: the revised nursing work index. Nurs Res 49:146–153 doi:10.1097/00006199-200005000-00006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Havens D, Aiken L (1999) Shaping systems to promote desired outcomes. J Nurs Adm 29:14–20 doi:10.1097/00005110-199902000-00006

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hackman J (1987) The design of work teams. In: Lorsch J (ed) Handbook of organizational behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  28. Roberts K (1990) Some characteristics of high reliability organizations. Organ Sci 1:160–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Roberts K, Bea R (2001) Must accidents happen? Lessons from high reliability organizations. Acad Manag Exec 15:70–79

    Google Scholar 

  30. Reason J (2004) Beyond the organizational accident: the need for ‘error wisdom’ on the frontline. Qual Saf Health Care 13:28–33 doi:10.1136/qshc.2003.009548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tucker A, Spear S (2006) Operational failures and interruptions in hospital nursing. Health Serv Res 41:643–662 doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00502.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Anderson J, Ramanujam R, Hensel D, Anderson M, Sirio C (2006) The need for organizational change in patient safety. Int J Med Inform 75:809–817 doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.05.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Haberstroh C (1965) Organization, Design and Systems Analysis in Handbook of Organizations. Rand McNally, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  34. Burke T, McKee J, Wilson H, Donahue R, Batenhorst A, Pathak D (2000) A comparison of time-and-motion and self-reporting methods of work measurement. J Nurs Adm 30:118–125 doi:10.1097/00005110-200003000-00003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Miles M, Huberman A (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  36. Redelmeier DA (2005) Improving patient care. The cognitive psychology of missed diagnoses. Ann Intern Med 142:115–120

    Google Scholar 

  37. Croskerry P (2003) Cognitive forcing strategies in clinical decision-making. Ann Emerg Med 41:110–120 doi:10.1067/mem.2003.22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Croskerry P (2003) The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Acad Med 78:775–780 doi:10.1097/00001888-200308000-00003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gilovich T, Medvec VH, Savitsky K (2000) The spotlight effect in social judgment: an egocentric bias in estimates of the salience of one’s own actions and appearance. J Pers Soc Psychol 78:211–222 doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jones E, Nisbett R (1985) Sex of employee and sex of supervisor: effect on attributions for the causality of success and failure. Sex Roles J Res 12:257–269 doi:10.1007/BF00287592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Weary G, Edwards J (1994) Individual differences in causal uncertainty. J Pers Soc Psychol 67:308–318 doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Science Applications International Corporation: Probabilistic risk assessment of the space shuttle. NASA/HQ, 28 February, 1995

  43. Fragola J (1996) Space shuttle probabilistic risk assessment. Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium

  44. Marx DA, Slonim AD (2003) Assessing patient safety risk before the injury occurs: an introduction to sociotechnical probabilistic risk modeling in health care. Qual Saf Health Care 12:33–38 doi:10.1136/qhc.12.suppl_2.ii33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kanki BG, Marx D, Hale MJ (2004) Socio-technical probabilistic risk assessment: its capabilities and limitations. Proceedings of International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management. Berlin, Germany

  46. Hovor C, O’Donnell LT (2007) Probabilistic risk analysis of medication error. Qual Manag Health Care 16:349–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Industrial Extension Service, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27606, USA

    Lukasz M. Mazur

  2. Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, 60115, USA

    Shi-Jie (Gary) Chen

Authors
  1. Lukasz M. Mazur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shi-Jie (Gary) Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shi-Jie (Gary) Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mazur, L.M., Chen, SJ.(. An empirical study for medication delivery improvement based on healthcare professionals’ perceptions of medication delivery system. Health Care Manag Sci 12, 56–66 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-008-9076-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-008-9076-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation