Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Restraint and Cancellation: Multiple Inhibition Deficits in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We used variations of the stop signal task to study two components of motor response inhibition—the ability to withhold a strong response tendency (restraint) and the ability to cancel an ongoing action (cancellation)—in children with a diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and in non-ADHD controls of similar age (ages 7–14 years). The goal was to determine if restraint and cancellation were related and if both were deficient in ADHD. The stop signal task involved a choice reaction time task (go task) which required a rapid response. The demand for inhibitory control was invoked through the presentation of a stop signal on a subset of go trials which required that the ongoing response be suspended. The stop signal was presented either concurrently with the go signal (restraint version) or after a variable delay (cancellation version). In Study 1, we compared ADHD and control children on the cancellation version of the stop task; in Study 2, we compared ADHD and controls on the restraint version. In Study 3, a subset of ADHD and control participants completed both tasks so that we could examine convergence of these dimensions of inhibition. Compared to control participants, ADHD participants showed a deficit both in the ability to cancel and to restrain a speeded motor response. Performance on the restraint version was significantly correlated with performance on the cancellation version in controls, but not in ADHD participants. We conclude that ADHD is associated with deficits in both restraint and cancellation subcomponents of inhibition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aron, A. R., Fletcher, P. C., Bullmore, E. T., Sahakian, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2003). Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 115–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A. R., & Poldrack, R. A. (2005). The cognitive neuroscience of response inhibition: Relevance for genetic research in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1285–1292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 170–177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Avila, C., Cuenca, I., Felix, V., Parcet, M. A., & Miranda, A. (2004). Measuring impulsivity in school-aged boys and examining its relationship with ADHD and ODD ratings. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 295–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A., Cocchini, G., Della Sala, S., Logie, R. H., & Spinnler, H. (1999). Working memory and vigilance: Evidence from normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and Cognition, 41, 87–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Band, G. P., & van Boxtel, G. J. (1999). Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: Review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms. Acta Psychologica (Amst), 101, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Band, G. P., Van Der Molen, M. W., & Logan, G. D. (2003). Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. Acta Psychologica (Amst), 112, 105–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkley, R. A. (1997). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, self-regulation, and time: Toward a more comprehensive theory. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 18, 271–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkley, R. A. (2001). The executive functions and self-regulation: An evolutionary neuropsychological perspective. Neuropsychol Review, 11, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brebner, J. (1968). Continuing and reversing the direction of responding movements: Some exceptions to the so-called “psychological refractory period.” Journal of Experiemental Pscyhology, 78, 120–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, P. W., Alderman, N., Evans, J., Emslie, H., & Wilson, B. A. (1998). The ecological validity of tests of executive function. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4, 547– 558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, C. C., Bellgrove, M. A., Stokes, M. G., Henderson, T. R., Garavan, H., Robertson, I. H., et al. (2006). Executive “brake failure” following deactivation of human frontal lobe. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 444–455.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chevrier, A., Noseworthy, M. D., & Schachar, R. (2004). Neural activity associated with failed inhibition: An event related fMRI study or performance monitoring. Brain & Cognition, 54, 163–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deiber, M. P., Honda, M., Ibanez, V., Sadato, N., & Hallett, M. (1999). Mesial motor areas in self-initiated versus externally triggered movements examined with fMRI: Effect of movement type and rate. Journal of Neurophysiology, 81, 3065–3077.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J., Burgess, P., & Emslie, H. (1995). Fluid intelligence after frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia, 33, 261–268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harnishfeger, K. K., & Pope, R. S. (1996). Intending to forget: The development of cognitive inhibition in directed forgetting. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62, 292–315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horstmann, G. (2003). The psychological refractory period of stopping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 965–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ickowicz, A., Schachar, R., Sugarman, R., Chen, S., Millette, C., & Cook, L. (2006). The parent interview for child symptoms (PICS): A situation-specific clinical research interview for attention deficit hyperactivity and related disorders. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50, 325–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimberg, D. Y., & Farah, M. J. (1993). A unified account of cognitive impairments following frontal lobe damage: The role of working memory in complex, organized behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 411–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindlon, D., Mezzacappa, E., & Earls, F. (1995). Psychometric properties of impulsivity measures: Temporal stability, validity and factor structure. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 645–661.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lappin, J. S., & Eriksen, C. W. (1966). Use of a delayed signal to stop a visual reaction time response. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 805–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leblanc, N., Chen, S., Swank, P. R., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Barnes, M., Dennis, M., et al. (2005). Response inhibition after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in children: Impairment and recovery. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 829–848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H. S., Fletcher, J. M., Kusnerik, L., Kufera, J. A., Lilly, M. A., Duffy, F. F., et al. (1996). Semantic memory following pediatric head injury: Relationship to age, severity of injury, and MRI. Cortex, 32, 461–478.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liefooghe, B., Vandierendonck, A., Muyllaert, I., Verbruggen, F., & Vanneste, W. (2005). The phonological loop in task alternation and task repetition. Memory, 13, 550–560.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. (1981). Attention, automaticity, and the ability to stop a speeded choice response. In J. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G., & Cowan, W. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G., Cowan, W., & Davis, K. (1984). On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: A model and a method. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 276–291.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G., Schachar, R., & Tannock, R. (1997). Impulsivity and inhibitory control. Psychological Science, 8, 60–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. (1985). Executive control of thought and action. Acta Psychologica, 60, 193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, G. D. (1994). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A users’ guide to the stop signal paradigm. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 189–239). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, C., & Rabbitt, P. (1998). Test/re-test reliability of the CANTAB and ISPOCD neuropsychological batteries: Theoretical and practical issues. Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. International Study of Post-Operative Cognitive Dysfunction. Neuropsychologia, 36, 915–923.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, S. C., Simmons, A. N., Arce, E., & Paulus, M. P. (2005). Dissociation of inhibition from error processing using a parametric inhibitory task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroreport, 16, 755–760.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, A., Dowson, J., Toone, B., Young, S., Bazanis, E., Robbins, T. W., et al. (2004). Characteristic neurocognitive profile associated with adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychological Medicine, 34, 681–692.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mesulam, M. M. (1986). Frontal cortex and behavior. Annals of Neurology, 19, 320–325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167– 202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49– 100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nigg, J. T. (2000). On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 220–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nigg, J. T. (2003). Response inhibition and disruptive behaviors: Toward a multiprocess conception of etiological heterogeneity for ADHD combined type and conduct disorder early-onset type. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1008, 170–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noppeney, U., Friston, K. J., et al. (2004). Degenerate neuronal systems sustaining cognitive functions. Journal of Anatomy, 205, 433– 442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ollman, R. T. (1973). Simple reactions with random countermanding of the “go” signal. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance (Vol. IV, pp. 571–581). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, B. F., & Ozonoff, S. (1996). Executive functions and developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines, 37, 51–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabbitt, P., & Lowe, C. (2000). Patterns of cognitive ageing. Psychological Research, 63, 308–316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Radvansky, G. A., Zacks, R. T., & Hasher, L. (2005). Age and inhibition: The retrieval of situation models. Journals of Gerontology Series B-Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 60, 276– 278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, S. M., Coghill, D. R., & Matthews, K. (2005). Neuropsychological functioning in stimulant-naive boys with hyperkinetic disorder. Psychological Medicine, 35, 1109–1120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, T. W., James, M., Owen, A. M., Sahakian, B. J., Lawrence, A. D., McInnes, L., et al. (1998). A study of performance on tests from the CANTAB battery sensitive to frontal lobe dysfunction in a large sample of normal volunteers: Implications for theories of executive functioning and cognitive aging. Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4, 474–490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubia, K., Russell, T., Overmeyer, S., Brammer, M. J., Bullmore, E. T., Sharma, T., et al. (2001). Mapping motor inhibition: Conjunctive brain activations across different versions of go/no-go and stop tasks. Neuroimage, 13, 250–261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubia, K., Smith, A. B., Brammer, M. J., Toone, B., & Taylor, E. (2005). Abnormal brain activation during inhibition and error detection in medication-naive adolescents with ADHD. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 1067–1075.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schachar, R., Levin, H. S., Max, J. E., Purvis, K., & Chen, S. (2004). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms and response inhibition after closed head injury in children: Do preinjury behavior and injury severity predict outcome? Developmental Neuropsychology, 25, 179–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schachar, R., Mota, V. L., Logan, G. D., Tannock, R., & Klim, P. (2000). Confirmation of an inhibitory control deficit in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 227–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schachar, R., Tannock, R., & Logan, G. (1993). Inhibitory control, impulsiveness, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 721–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schachar, R., Tannock, R., Marriott, M., & Logan, G. (1995a). Deficient inhibitory control in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23, 411–437.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schachar, R., Tannock, R., Marriott, M., & Logan, G. (1995b). Deficient inhibitory control in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23, 411–437.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 92–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semel, E., Wiig, E. I., & Secord, W. A. (1995). CELF 3 Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (3rd Ed.). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaywitz, B. A., Fletcher, J. M., & Shaywitz, S. E. (1995). Defining and classifying learning disabilities and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Child Neurology, 10(Suppl. 1), S50– S57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Small, D. M., Gitelman, D. R., Gregory, M. D., Nobre, A. C., Parrish, T. B., & Mesulam, M. M. (2003). The posterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex mediate the anticipatory allocation of spatial attention. Neuroimage, 18, 633–641.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stuss, D. T., Shallice, T., Alexander, M. P., & Picton, T. W. (1995). A multidisciplinary approach to anterior attentional functions. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 769, 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannock, R., Hum, M., Masellis, M., Humphries, T., & Schachar, R. (2002). Teacher telephone interview for children’s academic performance, attention, behavior, and learning: DSM-IV Version (TTI-IV). Toronto, Canada: The Hospital for Sick Children. Unpublished document.

  • Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., Notebaert, W., & Vandierendonck, A. (2005). Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition. Acta Psychologica, 120, 307–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., Szmalec, A., & Vandierendonck, A. (2005). Inhibiting responses when switching: Does it matter? Experimental Psychology, 52, 125–130.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen, F., Liefooghe, B., & Vandierendonck, A. (2005). On the difference between response inhibition and negative priming: Evidence from simple and selective stopping. Psychological Research, 69, 262–271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vince, M. A., & Welford, A. T. (1967). Time taken to change the speed of a respnse. Nature, 213, 532–533.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (3rd Ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerberg, H., Hirvikoski, T., Forssberg, H., & Klingberg, T. (2004). Visuo-spatial working memory span: A sensitive measure of cognitive deficits in children with ADHD. Child Neuropsychology, 10, 155–161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G. S. (1993). Wide Range Achievement Test—Revision 3. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willcutt, E. G., Doyle, A. E., Nigg, J. T., Faraone, S. V., & Pennington, B. F. (2005). Validity of the executive function theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A meta-analytic review. Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1336–1346.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. R., Ponesse, J. S., Schachar, R. J., Logan, G. D., & Tannock, R. (1999). Development of inhibitory control across the life span. Developmental Psychology, 35, 205–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery test—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, Inc.

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was support by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (NET-54016 to RS and PR and MOP-64277 to RS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Russell Schachar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schachar, R., Logan, G.D., Robaey, P. et al. Restraint and Cancellation: Multiple Inhibition Deficits in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. J Abnorm Child Psychol 35, 229–238 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-006-9075-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-006-9075-2

Keywords

Navigation