Skip to main content
Log in

The Frustrating Effects of Just Missing the Jackpot: Slot Machine Near-Misses Trigger Large Skin Conductance Responses, But No Post-reinforcement Pauses

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Near-misses in slot machines resemble jackpot wins but fall just short. Previous research has demonstrated that near-misses are behaviorally reinforcing despite the absence of monetary reward. We assessed the hedonic properties of near-misses by measuring the time between outcome delivery and the initiation of the next spin—the post-reinforcement pause (PRP) and skin conductance responses (SCRs) for losses, near-misses, and a range of wins (5, 15, 25, 50 or 250 credits) while participants (N = 122) played a slot machine simulator. PRPs and SCRs were compared for 40 low frequency and 22 high frequency slots players who were non-problem gamblers, 37 at risk players, and 23 problem gamblers. For winning outcomes, PRPs and SCRs tracked monotonically with win size such that progressively larger wins were associated with progressively larger PRPs and SCRs. Near-misses with jackpot symbols landing on the first two reels had significantly larger SCRs than regular losses, and other types of near misses. Crucially, PRPs for this kind of near-miss were significantly smaller than all wins, and when non-parametric statistics were used, significantly smaller than regular losses. This pattern of large SCRs and small PRPs suggest that these are highly frustrating outcomes that stimulate appetitive components of the reward system to promote continued gambling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcaro, A., Huber, R., & Panksepp, J. (2007). Behavioral functions of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system: An affective neuroethological perspective. Brain Research Reviews, 56, 283–321.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amsel, A. (1958). The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 102–119.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berridge, K. C. (2007). The debate over dopamine’s role in reward: The case for incentive salience. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 191, 391–431.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 183–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, H. W., & Clark, L. (2010). Gambling severity predicts midbrain response to near-miss outcomes. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 6180–6187.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L., Crooks, B., Clarke, R., Aitken, M. R. F., & Dunn, B. D. (2011). Physiological responses to near-miss outcomes and personal control during simulated gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 28, 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L., Lawrence, A. J., Astley-Jones, F., & Gray, N. (2009). Gambling near-misses enhance motivation to gamble and recruit win-related brain circuitry. Neuron, 61, 481–490.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cote, D., Caron, A., Aubert, J., & Ladouceur, R. (2003). Near wins prolong gambling on a video lottery terminal. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19, 380–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M., & Filion, D. L. (2000). The electrodermal system. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Bernston (Eds.), Handbook of psychophysiology (2nd ed., pp. 200–223). NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delfabbro, P. H., & Winefield, A. H. (1999). Poker‐machine gambling: An analysis of within session characteristics. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. J., Harrigan, K. A., Sandhu, R., Collins, K., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2010). Losses disguised as wins in modern multi-line video slot machines. Addiction, 105, 1819–1824.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., & Schreiber, J. E. (2004). Near-miss effects on response latencies and win estimations of slot machine players. The Psychological Record, 54, 335–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D. (1990a). Addiction to fruit machines: A preliminary study among young males. Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D. (1990b). The acquisition, development, and maintenance of fruit machine gambling in adolescents. Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D. (1990c). The cognitive psychology of gambling. The Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. (1991). Psychobiology of the near-miss in fruit machine gambling. Journal of Psychology, 125, 347–357.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Habib, R., & Dixon, M. R. (2010). Neurobehavioral evidence for the “near-miss” effect in pathological gamblers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 313–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K. A. (2008). Slot machine structural characteristics: Creating near-misses using high symbol award ratios. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 6, 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassinove, H. I., & Schare, M. L. (2001). Effects of the near-miss and the big win on persistence at slot machine gambling. Psychology and Addictive Behaviour, 15, 155–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koob, G. F. (2009). Neurobiological substrates for the dark side of compulsivity in addiction. Neuropharmacology, 56, 18–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koob, G. F., & Le Moal, M. (2008). Addiction and the brain antireward system. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 29–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, J. C. (1996). Principles of behaviour analysis. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.

  • Lobbestael, J., Arntz, A., & Wiers, R. W. (2008). How to push someone’s buttons: A comparison of four anger-induction methods. Cognition and Emotion, 22, 353–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lole, L., Gonsalvez, C. J., Blaszczynski, A., & Clarke, A. R. (2011). Electrodermal activity reliably captures physiological differences between wins and losses during gambling on electronic machines. Psychophysiology, Electrodermal Activity to Wins and Losses, 49, 154–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLin, O. H., Dixon, M. R., Daugherty, D., & Small, S. L. (2007). Using a computer simulation of three slot machines to investigate a gambler’s preference among varying densities of near-miss alternatives. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 237–241.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osumi, T., & Ohira, H. (2009). Cardiac responses predict decisions: An investigation of the relation between orienting response and decisions in the ultimatum game. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 74, 74–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parke, J., & Griffiths, M. (2004). Gambling addiction and the evolution of the “near-miss”. Addiction Research and Theory, 12, 407–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, H., Hunt, M., & Harper, D. (2010). An animal model of slot machine gambling: The effect of structural characteristics on response latency and persistence. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 521–531.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, R. L. (1986). The psychology of the near-miss. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2, 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2000). The psychology and neurobiology of addiction: An incentive-sensitization view. Addiction, 95, S91–S117.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scarf, D., Miles, K., Sloan, A., Goulter, N., Hegan, M., Seid-Fatemi, A., et al. (2011). Brain cells in avian ‘prefrontal cortex’ code for features of slot-machine-like-gambling. PLoS ONE, 6, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 47, 631–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, B. L., Gonsalvez, C. J., & Blaszczynski, A. (2010). Capturing SCL and HR changes to win and loss events during gambling on electronic machines. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 78, 265–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zack, M., & Poulos, C. X. (2009). Parallel roles for dopamine in pathological gambling and psychostimulant addiction. Current Drug Abuse Reviews, 2, 11–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan A. Fugelsang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dixon, M.J., MacLaren, V., Jarick, M. et al. The Frustrating Effects of Just Missing the Jackpot: Slot Machine Near-Misses Trigger Large Skin Conductance Responses, But No Post-reinforcement Pauses. J Gambl Stud 29, 661–674 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-012-9333-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-012-9333-x

Keywords

Navigation