Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Return to work expectation predicts work in chronic musculoskeletal and behavioral health disorders: Prospective study with clinical implications

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study Design: Prospective cohort study with 18-month follow-up. Objective: To investigate if long-term sick listed persons’ own predictions of their future return to work (RTW) have an impact on their RTW when controlling for other established factors. Method: Postal questionnaires at baseline were sent to persons who had been on sick leave for more than 90 days, and were employed in five municipalities and four county councils in Sweden. A follow-up regarding their RTW was performed 18 months later. Results: After 18 months 135 out of 508 persons (27%) had returned to work, full or part-time. In a multivariate logistic regression, the sick listed persons’ own prediction of their RTW proved to be highly significant (OR=8.28, 95% CI: 3.31–20.69). Only six out of 132 persons with a negative view of their RTW did return to wok. Other predictive factors that were found for RTW were: being on sick leave for a period of less than 1 year (OR=2.09, 95% CI: 1.19–3.67), having less pain than persons in the quartile with most pain (OR=2.65, 95% CI: 1.21–5.81), perceiving that one was welcome back to work (OR=1.98, 95% CI: 1.10–3.58), and being under 55 years of age (OR=2.37, 95% CI: 1.07–5.23 for age between 45 and 54 years and the same trend for age below 45 years OR=1.85, 95% CI: 0.82–4.20). Conclusion: Persons with a positive prediction should get help to realise their potential for RTW. Offering traditional rehabilitation measures to a person with a negative prediction of his/her RTW, could be a waste of resources if done ahead of improving self-confidence and view of what is possible. The problems in this group might decrease or be easier to handle if decisions about the future are taken within a year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krause N, Frank J, Dasinger L, Sullivan T, Sinclair S. Determinants of duration of disability and return-to-work after work-related injury and illness: Challenges for future research. Am J Ind Med 2001;40:464–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McIntosh G, Frank J, Hogg-Johnson S, Hall H, Bombardier C. Low back pain prognosis: Structured review of the Literature. J Occup Rehabil 2000;10(2):101–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Franche R-L, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: Conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehabil 2002;12(4):233–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Krause N, Dasinger L, Deegan L, Rudolph L, Brand R. Psychosocial job factors and return to work after compensated low back injury: A disability phase-specific analysis. Am J Ind Med 2001;40:374–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dasinger L, Deegan L, Brand R, Rudolph L. Physical workplace factors and return to work after compensated low back injury. J Occup Environ Med 2000;42(3):323–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Friesen M, Yassi A, Cooper J. Return-to-work: the importance of human interactions and organizational structures. Work 2001;17(1):11–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baril R, Clarke J, Friesen M, Stock S, Cole D, Group tW-R. Management of return-to-work programs for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: A qualitative study in three Canadian provinces. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:2101–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mondloch M, Cole D, Frank J. Does how you do depend on how you think you'll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients´ recovery expectations and health outcomes. CMAJ 2001;165(2):174–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cole D, Mondloch M, Group EPM. Listening to injured workers: How recovery expectations predict outcomes? Can Med Soc J 2002;166:749–54.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marhold C, Linton S, Melin L. Identification of obstacles for chronic pain patients to return to work: Evaluation of a questionnaire. J Occup Rehabil 2002;12(2):65–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sandström J, Esbjörnsson E. Return to work after rehabilitation: The significance of the patient's own prediction. Scand J Rehabil Med 1986;18(1):29–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Beecher H. The powerful placebo. JAMA 1955;159:1602–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Benight C, Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: the role of perceived self-efficacy. Behav Res Ther 2004;42(10):1129–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heijbel B, Josephson M, Jensen I, Vingård E. Employer, insurance, and health system response to long-term sick leave in the public sector: Policy implications. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15(2):149–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe F, Dworkiin S. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992;50:133–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bloch F, Prins R. Who returns to work and why? A six country study on work incapacity and reintegration. New Brunswick New Jersey: Transaction Publisher; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Berglind H, Gerner U. Motivation and return to work among the long-term sicklisted: An action theory perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24(14):719–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. van der Weide W, Verbeek J, van Dijk F. Relation between indicators for quality of occupational rehabilitation of employees with low back pain. Occup Environ Med 1999;56(7):488–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Anema J, Van Der Giezen A, Buijs P, CVan Mechelen W. Ineffective disability management by docotrs is an obstacle for return to work: A cohort study on low back pain paitients sicklisted for 3–4 months. Occup Environ Med 2002;59(11):729–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nordqvist C, Holmqvist C, Alexanderson K. Views of laypersons on the role employers play in return to work when sick-listed. J Occup Rehabil 2003;13(1):11–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dellve L, Lagerström M, Hagberg M. Rehabilitation of home care workers: supportive factors and obstacles prior to disability pension due to musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil 2002;12(2):55–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Krause N, Dasinger L, Neuhauser F. Modified work and return to work: a review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil 1998;8(2):113–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. van Duijn M, Miedema H, Elders L, Burdorf A. Barriers for early return-to-work of workers with musculoskeletal disorders according to occupational health physicians and human resource managers. J Occup Rehabil 2004;14(1):31–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kenny D. Employers’ perspectives on the provision of suitable duties in occupational rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil 1999;9(4):267–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Marianne Ekdahl for her work with the data collection. We would also like to express our gratitude to Christian Garheden for his help with the computer technology. This study was supported by grants from the AFA Insurance Co, Sweden.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section for Personal Injury Prevention, Karolinska Institutet, Box 12718, SE-112 94, Stockholm, Sweden

    Bodil Heijbel & Irene Jensen

  2. Department of Medical Sciences, Akademiska sjukhuset, Uppsala University, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden

    Malin Josephson, Stefan Stark & Eva Vingård

Authors
  1. Bodil Heijbel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Malin Josephson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Irene Jensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stefan Stark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Eva Vingård
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bodil Heijbel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heijbel, B., Josephson, M., Jensen, I. et al. Return to work expectation predicts work in chronic musculoskeletal and behavioral health disorders: Prospective study with clinical implications. J Occup Rehabil 16, 169–180 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-006-9016-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-006-9016-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation