Skip to main content
Log in

What Happens to Work if you’re Unwell? Beliefs and Attitudes of Managers and Employees With Musculoskeletal Pain in a Public Sector Setting

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction: Musculoskeletal complaints can impact on work in terms of productivity, sickness absence and long term incapacity for work. While employee attitudes and knowledge can drive absenteeism and presenteeism behaviour, managers also play an important role in influencing this via the quality of their relationships with employees and their role in implementing organisational policies and procedures. The aims of this study were to investigate the beliefs and attitudes of managers and employees with musculoskeletal pain about sickness absence, presenteeism, and return to work and to identify areas of consensus and conflict. Methods: 18 employees with musculoskeletal pain and 20 managers from two large public sector organisations in South Wales, UK, took part in individual face-to-face interviews. Data were analysed thematically using NVivo. Results: Employees’ and managers’ reports indicated that there was a strong culture of presenteeism in these organisations. Establishing the legitimacy of complaints was a salient theme for both managers and employees, although their views were in conflict. Employees reported feeling that contact with employers was intrusive when sickness absence was legitimate. Managers were supportive of those who they felt were ‘genuinely’ unwell, but also cited examples of people ‘working the system’ and not reporting absences appropriately. Conclusions: These issues require careful consideration of the rights and responsibilities of both employees and employers, where strategies for improving communication, trust, and creating an environment conducive to successful return to work need to be investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CIPD. Annual survey report 2006: absence management. In. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development; 2006.

  2. Nguyen TH, Randolph DC. Nonspecific low back pain and return to work. Am Fam Physician. 2007;76:1497–502.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Waddell G, Aylward M. The scientific and conceptual basis of incapacity benefits. London: TSO; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maniadakis N, Gray A. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain. 2000;84(1):95–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, Morganstein D. Lost productive work time costs from health conditions in the United States: results from the American Productivity Audit. J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45(12):1234–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Leeuwen MT, Blyth FM, March LM, Nicholas MK, Cousins MJ. Chronic pain and reduced work effectiveness: the hidden cost to Australian employers. Eur J Pain. 2006;10:161–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barnes MC, Buck R, Williams G, Webb KL, Aylward M. Beliefs about common health problems and work: a qualitative study. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(4):657–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Main CJ, Sullivan MJ, Watson PJ. Pain and work: organisational perspectives. In: Pain management: practical application of the biopsychosocial perspective in clinical and occupational settings. Churchill Livingstone; 2007:369–91.

  9. Buck R, Barnes MC, Cohen D, Aylward M. Common health problems, yellow flags and functioning in a community setting. J Occup Rehab. 2010;20(2):235–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Johansson G, Lundberg I. Adjustment latitude and attendance requirements as determinants of sickness absence or attendance. Empirical tests of the illness flexibility model. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(10):1857–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aronsson G, Gustafsson K. Attendance presenteeism: prevalence, attendance-pressure factors and an outline of a model for research. J Occup Environ Med. 2005;47(9):258–966.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Halligan PW. Beliefs: shaping experience and understanding illness. In: Halligan PW, Aylward M, editors. The power of belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leventhal H, Leventhal EA, Contrada RJ. Self-regulation, health, and behavior: a perceptual-cognitive approach. Psychol Health. 1998;13(4):717–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Diefenbach MA, Leventhal H. The common-sense model of illness representation: theoretical and practical considerations. J Soc Distress Homel. 1996;5(1):11–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Weinman J, Petrie KJ. Illness perceptions: a new paradigm for psychosomatics? J Psychosom Res. 1997;42(2):113–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Buck R, Porteous C, Wynne-Jones G, Marsh K, Phillips CJ, Main CJ. Using the Flags system to identify problems and potential solutions for employees with common health problems; a qualitative approach (in press).

  17. Baker-McClearn D, Greasley K, Dale J, Griffith F. Absence management and presenteeism: the pressures on employees to attend work and the impact of attendence on performance. Hum Resource Manag. 2010;20(3):311–28.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Munir F, Randall R, Yarker J, Nielsen K. The influence of employer support on employee management of chronic health conditions at work. J Occup Rehab. 2009;19:333–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Munir F, Yarker J, Haslam C. Sickness absence management: encouraging attendance or ‘risk-taking’ presenteeism in employees with chronic illness? Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(19):1461–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wynne-Jones G, Buck R, Varnava A, Phillips CJ, Main CJ. Impacts on work absence and performance: what really matters? Occup Med. 2009;59(8):556–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wynne-Jones G, Varnava A, Buck R, Karanika-Murray M, Griffiths A, Phillips C, Cox T, Kahn S, Main CJ. Examination of the work organization assessment questionnaire in public sector workers. J Occup Environ Med. 2009;51(5):586–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Aas RW, Ellingsen KL, Lindoe P, Moller A. Leadership qualities in the return to work process: a content analysis. J Occup Rehab. 2008;18(4):335–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kvale S. InterViews: an introduction to qualitative research interviews. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Blaxter M. Health. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dey I. Qualitative data analysis: a user friendly guide for social scientists. London: Routledge; 1993.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Cunningham-Burley S, Backett-Milburn K, Kemmer D. Constructing health and sickness in the context of motherhood and paid work. Sociol Health Ill. 2006;28(4):385–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. van Duijn M, Miedema H, Elders L, Burdorf A. Barriers for early return-to-work of workers with musculoskeletal disorders according to occupational health physicians and human resource managers. J Occup Rehab. 2004;14(1):31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Parsons T. The social system. New York: Free Press; 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Williams G. Health knowlegde. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shaw WS, van der Windt DA, Main CJ, Loisel P, Linton SJ, Group tDotFW. Early patient screening and intervention to address individual-level occupational factors (“Blue Flags”) in back pain disability. J Occup Rehab. 2009;19:64–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kendall N, Burton A, Main C, Watson P. Tackling musculoskeletal problems: a guide for the clinic and workplace—identifying obstacles using the psychosocial flags framework. London: The Stationary Office; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Welsh Assembly Government and the Wales Centre for Health. We wish to acknowledge the Well-being in Work steering group for their advice and support and we would like to thank the participating organisations and employees. We would like thank Katie Marsh for her assistance during the data collection and early analysis stages of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gwenllian Wynne-Jones.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wynne-Jones, G., Buck, R., Porteous, C. et al. What Happens to Work if you’re Unwell? Beliefs and Attitudes of Managers and Employees With Musculoskeletal Pain in a Public Sector Setting. J Occup Rehabil 21, 31–42 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-010-9251-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-010-9251-7

Keywords

Navigation