Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Metalinguistic Awareness and Reading Performance: A Cross Language Comparison

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study examined two questions: (1) do the greater phonological awareness skills of billinguals affect reading performance; (2) to what extent do the orthographic characteristics of a language influence reading performance and how does this interact with the effects of phonological awareness. We estimated phonological metalinguistic abilities and reading measures in three groups of first graders: monolingual Hebrew speakers, bilingual Russian–Hebrew speakers, and Arabic-speaking children. We found that language experience affects phonological awareness, as both Russian–Hebrew bilinguals and the Arabic speakers achieved higher scores on metalinguistic tests than Hebrew speakers. Orthography affected reading measures and their correlation with phonological abilitites. Children reading Hebrew showed better text reading ability and significant correlations between phonological awareness and reading scores. Children reading Arabic showed a slight advantage in single word and nonword reading over the two Hebrew reading groups, and very weak relationships between phonological abilities and reading performance. We conclude that native Arabic speakers have more difficulty in processing Arabic orthography than Hebrew monolinguals and bilinguals have in processing Hebrew orthography, and suggest that this is due to the additional visual complexity of Arabic orthography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abudarham S. (1997). The tenability of comparing the receptive lexical proficiency of dual language children with standardized monoglot norms. Educational Studies 23, 127–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia S. (1996). Druze minority students learning Hebrew in Israel: The relationship of attitudes, cultural background, and interestingness of material with reading comprehension in a second language. The Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 17, 415–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia S., Siegel L.S. (1995). Different orthographies, different context effects: The effects of Arabic sentence context on skilled and poor readers. Reading Psychology 16, 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball E.W., Blachman B.A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognitionand developmental spelling?. Reading Research Quarterly 26, 49–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Zeev S. (1977). The influence of bilingualism on cognitive strategy and cognitive development. Child Development 48, 1009–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentin S., Leshem H. (1993). On the interaction between phonological awareness and reading acquisition: It’s a two way street. Annals of Dyslexia 43, 125–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman R.A. (1978). Modern Hebrew structure. Tel Aviv, Israel, University Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelson P., Morais J., Alegria J., Content A. (1985). Phonetic analysis capacity and learning to read. Nature 313, 73–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowey J.A., Patel R.K. (1988). Metalinguistic ability and early reading achievement. Applied Psycholinguistics 9, 367–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley L., Bryant P.E. (1985). Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossu G., Shankweiler D., Liberman I.Y., Katz L., Tola G. (1988). Awareness of phonological segments and reading ability in Italian children. Applied Psycolinguistics 9, 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dash U.N., Mishra H.C. (1992). Bilingualism and metalinguistic development: Evidence from Kond tribal culture. Psychological Studies 37, 81–87

    Google Scholar 

  • de Manrique A.M.B., Gramigna S. (1984). La segmentación fonológica y silábica en ni nos de preescolar y primer grado. Lectura y Vida 5/1: 4–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle A., Champagne M., Segalowitz N. (1978). Some issues on the assessment of linguistic consequences of early bilingualism. In: Paradis M.(ed) Aspects of bilingualism. Colombia, SC, Hornbeam Press, pp. 13-20

    Google Scholar 

  • Eid M. (1990). Arabic linguistrics: The current scene. In: Eid M.(ed) Perspectives on Arabic linguistics I. Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 3–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards D., Christophersen H. (1988). Bilingualism, literacy and meta linguistic awareness in preschool children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 6, 235–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Eviatar Z., Ibrahim R. (2001). Bilingual is as bilingual does: Metalinguistic abilities of Arabic-speaking children. Applied Psycholinguistics 21, 451–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson C.A. (1959). Diglossia. In: Giglioli P.P.(ed) Language and social context. London, Penguin, pp. 232–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost R. (1994). Prelexical and postlexical strategies in reading: Evidence from a deep and a shallow orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20: 116–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim R., Aharon-Peretz J (2005). Is literary Arabic a second language for native Arab speakers?: Evidence from a semantic priming study. The Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34(1): 51–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim R., Eviatar Z., Aharon Peretz J. (2002). The characteristics of the Arabic orthography slow its cognitive processing. Neuropsycholgy 16, 322–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keatly C., Spinks J., de Gelder B. (1994). Asymmetrical semantic facilitation between language. Memory and Cognition 22, 70–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Muter V., Hulme C., Snowling M., Taylor S. (1997). Segmentation, not rhyming, predicts early progress in learning to read. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 65, 370–396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roman G., Pavard B. (1987). A comparative study: How we read Arabic and French. In: O’Regan J.K., Levy-Schoen A.(eds) Eye movement: From physiology to cognition. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, North Holland Elsevier, pp. 431–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Seginer R., Halabi-Kheir H. (1998). Adolescent passage to adulthood: Future orientationin the context of culture, age, and gender. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 22, 309–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shany, M., & Ben Dror, I. (2002). Surface and phonological reading: Evidence from Hebrew orthography. Paper presented at the Conference Program of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading. The Palmer House Hilton, Chicago.

  • Tunmer W.E., Nesdale A.R. (1986). Phonemic segmentations kill and beginning reading. Journal of Educational Psychology 77, 417–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yelland G.W., Pollard J., Mercuri A. (1993). The metalinguistic benefits of limited contact with a second language. Applied Psycholinguistics 14, 423–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raphiq Ibrahim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ibrahim, R., Eviatar, Z. & Aharon-Peretz, J. Metalinguistic Awareness and Reading Performance: A Cross Language Comparison. J Psycholinguist Res 36, 297–317 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9046-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9046-3

Keywords

Navigation